This article explores the impact of the Copernican and Darwinian revolutions on our view of human-kind’s place in the universe and locates the current debates about stem cell research within this larger sociohistorical context. The article argues that the past 500 years of science support the idea that the morally significant features of human beings reside in the unique cognitive, emotive, and social traits that are often described as the “soul,” not in any special features of human physiology, anatomy, or genetics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Audi, R.
(2001). The architecture of reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Gibbons, A.
(1998). Which of our genes make us human?Science, 281, 1432-1434.
3.
Juengst, E.
, & Fossel, M. (2000). The ethics of embryonic stem cells—Now and forever, cells without end. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 3180-3184.
4.
Kuhn, T.
(1957). The Copernican revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Meilander, G.
(2001). The point of a ban: Or, how to think about stem cell research. Hastings Center Report, 31(1), 9-16.
6.
Meyer, M.
, & Nelson, L. (2001). Respecting what we destroy: Reflection on human embryo research. Hastings Center Report, 31(1), 16-23.
7.
Miller, E.
(1995). God and reason. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
Ruse, M.
(1979). The Darwinian revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Singer, P.
(1975). Animal liberation. New York: Avon.
10.
Steinbock, B.
(1992). Life before birth. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Weissman, I.
, & Baltimore, D. (2001). Disappearing stem cells, disappearing science. Science, 292, 601-601.
