Climate change presents a fundamental challenge to the current global energy regime. Under the Framework Convention on Climate Change, the international community is developing the architecture of a policy response. Three serious flaws are examined: (a) the potential sacrifice of small island states, (b) the use of market-based policy measures to commodify the atmospheric commons, and (c) the substitution of carbon sequestration for meaningful reductions in energy use. The authors’ analysis of the politics of climate change, based on these issues, suggests a new understanding of ecology is emerging—what they term postmodern ecology—in which a global environmental crisis is risked to secure the future of the world energy regime. An alternative, based on principles of sustainability and equity, is proposed that would require abandoning the global energy status quo.
Bouton, K. A. (1999). The political economy of acceptable risk: The case of global warming. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy, University of Delaware.
2.
Byrne, J., Glover, L., & Martinez, C. (in press). The production of unequal nature. In J. Byrne, C. Martinez, & L. Glover (Eds.), Environmental justice: Discourses in international political economy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
3.
Byrne, J., & Inniss, V. (2000). Island sustainability and sustainable development in the context of climate change (Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Development for Island Societies). Taipei, Taiwan: National Science Council. Available from the authors (jbbyrne@udel.edu or vernesei@udel.edu).
4.
Byrne, J., Wang, Y-D., Lee, H., & Kim, J-D. (1998). An equity and sustainability-based policy response to global climate change. Energy Policy, 26(4), 335-343.
5.
Byrne, J., & Yun, S-J. (1999). Efficient global warming: Contradictions in liberal democratic responses to global environmental problems. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 19(6), 493-500.
6.
Crosby, A. W. (1988). Ecological imperialism: The biological expansion of Europe. New York: Canto.
7.
Escobar, A. (1996). Constructing nature: Elements for a poststructural political ecology. In R. Peet & M. Watts (Eds.), Liberation ecologies: Environment, development, and social movements (pp. 46-68). London: Routledge.
8.
Flavin, C., & Dunn, S. (1998, July). Climate of opportunity: Renewable energy after Kyoto (Issue brief of the Renewable Energy Policy Project. No. 1). Washington, DC: Renewable Energy Policy Project.
9.
Foster, J. B. (1994). The vulnerable planet: A short economic history of the environment. New York: Monthly Review Press.
10.
Foundation for International Environmental Law and Development. (1999). Agenda-based briefing note for the 5th session of the COP of the FCCC. Prepared for the Alliance of Small Island Developing States. London, UK: FIELD.
11.
Gaffin, S. R. (1997). High water blues: Impacts of sea level rise on selected coasts and islands. New York, NY: Environmental Defense Fund.
12.
Gare, A. E. (1995). Postmodernism and the environmental crisis. London: Routledge.
13.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (1992). Climate change: The IPCC scientific assessment (J. T. Houghton, G. J. Jenkins, & J. J. Ephraums, Eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (1996a). Climate change 1995: Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate chang (R. T. Watson, M. C. Zinyowera, & R. H. Moss, Eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (1996b). Climate change 1995: The science of climate change (J. T. Houghton, L. G. Meira Filho, B. A. Callender, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg, & K. Maskell, Eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (1996c). The IPCC second assessment synthesis of scientific technical information relevant to interpreting Article 2 of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. New York: United Nations Environment Program.
17.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2000a). Emissions scenarios (Special report of the IPCC) (N. Nakicenovic & R. Swart, Eds.) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2000b). Land use, land use change, and forestry (Special report of the IPCC) (R. T. Watson, I. R. Noble, B. Bolin, N. H. Ravindranath, D. J. Verardo, & D. J. Dokken, Eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2001a). Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability (J. J. McCarthy, O. F. Canziani, N. A. Leary, D. J. Dokken, & K. S. White, Eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2001b). Climate change 2001: The scientific basis (J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Gripps, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, & D. Xiaosu, Eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
International Energy Agency. (2001). What happened in Bonn?Paris: International Energy Agency. Retrieved from http://www.iea.org
22.
Kopp, R. J., & Anderson, J. W. (1998). Estimating the costs of Kyoto: How plausible are the Clinton administration’s figures?Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
23.
Marland, G., Boden, T., & Andres, R. J. (2001). National CO 2 emissions from fossil-fuel burning, cement manufacture, and gas flaring: 1751-1998. Available from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Web site, http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/ndp030/nation98ems
24.
National Energy Policy Development Group. (2001). National energy policy (Report of the National Energy Policy Development Group). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
25.
Nordhaus, W. D. (1991, July). To slow or not to slow: The economics of the greenhouse effect. Economic Journal, 101(6), 920-937.
26.
Pearce, F. (1998). Playing dirty in Kyoto. New Scientist, 157(2117), 48-48.
27.
Shiva, V. (1994). The seed and the earth. In V. Shiva (Ed.), Close to home: Women reconnect ecology, health and development worldwide (pp. 128-143). Philadelphia: New Society.
28.
United Nations Department of Public Information. (1999, September 27-28). Press kit on small islands: Issues and actions (DPI/ 2061—July 1999—5M). New York: United Nations.
29.
United Nations Framework convention on Climate Change Secretariat. (1995, March 28-April 7). Report of the first Conference of the Parties on its first session. [Held in Berlin from 28 March to 7 April 1995.] (FCCC/CP/1995/7). Retrieved from http://www.unfccc.de/resource/copl/07.htm.
30.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1999). Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-1997. Washington, DC: Author.
31.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
World Resources Institute. (2001). World resources 2000-2001.New York: Oxford University Press.
