The specific nature and dynamic of the emerging triple helix of state-industry-university relations in Japan and Singapore is analyzed in this article. The impact of globalization and the emergence of trans-disciplinary scientific fields on this institutional reconstitution are examined. Overall, the implications of these transformations for the debates over the knowledge society are discussed.
Baber, Z. (1996). The science of empire: Scientific knowledge, civilization and colonial rule in India. Albany: State University of New York Press.
2.
Bell, D. (1973). The coming of postindustrial society. New York: Basic Books.
3.
Bell, D. (1980). The social framework of the information society. In T. Forester (Ed.), The microelectronics revolution(pp. 500-549). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
4.
Castells, M. (1989). The informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring and the urban-regional process. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
5.
Castells, M. (1996a). The Net and the self: Working notes for a critical theory of the informational society. Critique of Anthropology, 16(1), 9-38.
6.
Castells, M. (1996b). The rise of network society. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
7.
Etzkowitz, H. (1997). The entrepreneurial university and the emergence of democratic corporatism. In H. Etzkowitz & L. Leydesdorff (Eds.), Universities and the global knowledge economy. London: Pinter.
8.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.). 1997. Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations. London: Pinter.
9.
Etzkowitz, H., & Webster, A. (1995). Science as intellectual property. In Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Peterson, J., & Pinch, T. (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies(pp. 480-505). London: Sage.
10.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M.(1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
11.
Goh, C. B. (1998). Creating a research and development culture in Southeast Asia: Lessons from Singapore’s experience. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 26(1), 49-68.
12.
Goto, K. (1998). The privatization of science and technology: The public-private relationship in perspective. In Goto K., Gibson, D.V., Lopez-Cepero, H., & Stewart, G. (Eds.), The science city in a global context(pp. 205-210). Austin, TX: IC2 Institute.
13.
Goto, K., Gibson, D.V., Lopez-Cepero, H., & Stewart, G. (Eds.). (1998). The science city in a global context. Austin, TX: IC2 Institute.
14.
Guston, D., & Kenniston, K. (Eds.). (1994). The fragile contract: University science and the federal government. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
16.
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New York: Verso.
17.
Kawamoto, T. (1998). Partnership among the public, academic, and private sectors in Tsukuba. In Goto K., Gibson, D.V., Lopez-Cepero, H., & Stewart, G. (Eds.), The science city in a global context(pp. 55-60). Austin, TX: IC2 Institute.
18.
Khondker, H. H. (1994). An examination of science policies in the Asia-Pacific region(Research report). Singapore: National University of Singapore.
19.
Low, M. (1997). Japan: From technology to science policy. In H. Etzkowitz & L. Leydesdorff (Eds.), Universities and the global knowledge economy(pp. 132-140). London: Pinter.
20.
Merton, R. (1973). Sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Mukerji, C. (1989). A fragile power: Scientists and the state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (1997, Summer). Academic capitalism, managed professionals, and supply-side higher education. Social Text, 51, 9-38.
23.
Sigurdson, J. (1995). Science and technology in Japan. London: Cartermill.
24.
Stehr, N. (1994). Knowledge societies. Sage: London.
25.
Visvanathan, S. (1984). Organizing for science. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
26.
Wallerstein, I. (1991). Unthinking social science: The limits of nineteenth century paradigms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Webster, A. (1994). University-corporate ties and the construction of research agendas. Sociology, 28(1), 123-142.
