Contaminated land is a global concern and can be considered a major barrier to sustainable development. The purpose of this article is to examine how the technological, economic, environmental, social, legal, and political framework of contaminated sites and the current remediation strategies hinder progress toward sustainability. Conflicts between various dimensions of sustainability reveal that the only long-term solution to this problem is prevention. This article will place particular emphasis on the technological dimension of remediation practices and how a reliance on technological solutions may well propagate the problem by diverting the focus from preventive measures.
Brown, L., Gardner, G., & Halweil, B. (1998). Beyond Malthus: Nineteen dimensions of the population challenge. New York: Norton.
2.
Chadwick, M. J., & Nilsson, J. (1993). Environmental quality objectives: Assimilative capacity and critical load concepts in environmental management. In T. Jackson (Ed.), Clean production strategies(pp. 29-39). New York: Lewis.
3.
Dorfman, M., White, A., Becker, M., & Jackson, T. (1993). Profiting from pollution prevention: Better environmental protection; improved economic competitiveness. In T. Jackson (Ed.), Clean production strategies(pp. 189-206). New York: Lewis.
4.
Dower, R. C. (1990). Hazardous wastes. In P. R. Portney (Ed.), Public policies for environmental protection(pp. 151-194). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
5.
Durning, A. (1992). How much is enough? The consumer society and the future of the earth. New York: W. W. Norton.
6.
Gibbs, L. (1998). Love canal: The story continues. Stony Creek, CT: New Society.
7.
Gilliland, J. A. (1992). A Canadian groundwater strategy: Environment Canada[Online]. Available: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wat/gws/gwdocs/gweddocs/nat_gw_strat.html
8.
Graber, D. R., & Aldrich, T. E. (1993). Working with community organizations to evaluate potential disease clusters. Social Science Medicine, 8, 1079-1085.
9.
Hardin G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
10.
Hollins, M., & Percy, S. (1998). Environmental liability for contaminated land: Towards a European consensus. Land Use Policy, 2, 119-133.
11.
Kavanaugh, M. C. (1996). An overview of the management of contaminated sites in the US: The conflict between technology and public policy. Water Science and Technology, 7-8, 275-283.
12.
Manno, J. P. (2000). Privileged goods: Commoditization and its impact on environment and society. New York: Lewis.
13.
National Roundtable on the Environment. (1997). The financial services sector and brownfield redevelopment. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
14.
Office of the Auditor General. (1996). Federal contaminated sites: Management information on environmental costs and liabilities[Online]. Available: http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/a1b15d892a1f761%20a852565c40068a492/8510216d5adb2c5c852565d90072c741?OpenDocument
15.
Page, G. W. (1997). Contaminated sites and environmental clean-up. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16.
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk systems. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Rulkens, W. H., Tichy, R., & Grotenhuis, J.T.C. (1998). Remediation of polluted soil and sediment: Perspectives and failures. Water Science and Technology, 8, 27-35.
18.
Syms, P. M. (1997). Contaminated land: The practice and economics of redevelopment. London: Blackwell Science Ltd.
19.
United Nations. (1997). Compendium of soil clean-up technologies and soil remediation companies. New York: Author.
20.
Vanderburg, W. H. (2000). The labyrinth of technology. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
