This article discusses popular and academic debates that turned on the merit of either science or the humanities. The author uses four cases to provide this history: the Huxley-Arnold debate of the 1880s, the science education reformation (and neglect-of-science) debates in Britain in the 1920s, the two-culture debate of the 1960s, and the science wars of recent years. Each of those debates (on one side, at least) sought to establish the supremacy of science for society’s welfare, and the first three (on both sides) necessarily excised interdisciplinary approaches from their proposed solutions. More recently, the science wars have drawn comparison to the two-culture debate, even though this recent skirmish cannot be distinguished from a concern over the effects of interdisciplinary scholarship. The purpose of this article is to trace the relationship of the debates and comment on their role for the future of STS.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Annan, N. (1987). Two monists. Cambridge Review, 108, 4-6.
2.
Arnold, M. (1903). Literature and science. In The works of Matthew Arnold(Vol. 4, pp. 317-348). London: Macmillan. (Original work published 1882)
3.
Barber, B. (1998). Intellectual pursuits: Toward an understanding of culture. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
4.
Bauer, H. H. (1990). A dialectical discussion on the nature of disciplines and disciplinarity. Social Epistemology, 4, 215-227.
5.
Bauer, H. H. (2000). Anti-science in current science and technology studies. In U. Segerstråle (Ed.), Beyond the science wars: The missing discourse about science and society(pp. 41-62). Albany: State University of New York Press.
6.
Biagioli, M. (Ed.). (1999). The science studies reader. New York: Routledge.
7.
Burnett, G. (1999). A view from the bridge: The two culture debate, its legacy, and the history of science. Daedalus, 128, 193-218.
8.
Buxton, W. (1992). Snow’s two cultures revisited. In L. Jacobson (Ed.), Cyberarts: Exploring art & technology(pp. 24-31). San Francisco: Miller Freeman.
9.
Cantor, G. (1997). Charles Singer and the early years of the BSHS. British Journal of the History of Science, 30, 5-24.
10.
Collini, S. (1993). Introduction to The two cultures.In The two cultures(pp. vii-lxxiii). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Collins, H. M., & Labinger, J. (Eds.). (2001). The one culture?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Cunningham, A., & Williams, P. (1993). De-centering the “big picture”: The origins of modern science and the modern origins of science. British Journal of the History of Science, 26, 407-432.
13.
Cutcliffe, S. (2000). Ideas, machines, and values: An introduction to science, technology, and society studies. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
14.
de Laet, M. (1997). STS: An insider’s perspective. 21st C., No. 2.3. Available: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/21stC/issue-2.3/delaet.html.
15.
Forman, P. (1999). In postmodernity the cultures are one—and many. Revista de Occidente, 225, 110-121.
16.
Franklin, S. (1996). Making transparencies: Seeing through the science wars. In A. Ross (Ed.), Science wars(pp. 151-167). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
Fuller, S. (1995a). A tale of two cultures and other higher superstitions. History of the Human Sciences, 8, 115-125.
18.
Fuller, S. (1995b). Two cultures II: Science studies goes public. EASST Review, 14, 21-24.
19.
Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Gieryn, T. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781-795.
21.
Gieryn, T. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Grau, K. (1999). Force and nature: The Department of the History and Philosophy of Science at Indiana University, 1960-1998. Catching Up With the Vision: A Supplement to ISIS, 90, S295-S318.
23.
Gross, P. R., & Levitt, N. (1994). Higher superstition: The academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
24.
Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Holton, G. (1993). Science and anti-science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Hultberg, J. (1991). A tale of two cultures: The image of science ofC. P. Snow. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
27.
Huxley, T. H. (1968). Science and education. New York: Green-wood Press. (Original work published 1898)
28.
Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Petersen, J. C., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (1995). Handbook of science and technology studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Jenkins, E. W. (1979). From Armstrong to Nuffield: Studies in twentieth century science education in England and Wales. London: Routledge.
30.
Koertge, N. (Ed.). (1998). A house built on sand: Exposing postmodernist myths about science. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Leavis, F. R. (1972). Nor shall my sword: Discourses on pluralism, compassion, and hope. New York: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1962)
33.
Mayer, A.-K. (1997). Moralizing science: The uses of science’s past in national education in the 1920’s. British Journal of the History of Science, 30, 51-70.
34.
O’Hear, A. (1996). Two cultures revisited. Philosophy, 41(Suppl.), 1-16.
35.
Roos, D. A. (1979). Matthew Arnold, Thomas Henry Huxley, and the rhetoric of friendship and controversy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
36.
Rorty, R. (2000, March 16). Being that can be understood is language: Richard Rorty on H.-G. Gadamer. London Review of Books, pp. 23-25.
37.
Rossiter, M. (1999). Introduction. Catching Up With the Vision: A Supplement to ISIS, 90, S2-S2.
38.
Rouse, J. (1987). Knowledge and power: Toward a political philosophy of science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
39.
Rouse, J. (1993). What are cultural studies of scientific knowledge?Configurations, 1, 1-22.
40.
Sarton, G. (1924). Preface to Volume VI. ISIS, 6, 4-4.
41.
Sarton, G. (1962). The history of science and the new humanism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1931)
42.
Segerstråle, U. (Ed.). (2000). Beyond the science wars: The missing discourse about science and society. Albany: State University of New York Press.
43.
Shapin, S. (2001). How to be anti-scientific. In H. Collins & J. Labinger (Eds.), The one culture?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Singer, C. (1927). Introduction. In D. M. Turner (Ed.), Makers of science, electricity, and magnetism(p. x-x). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Singer, C. (1949). The role of the history of science. Bulletin of the British Society for the History of Science, 1, 16-18.
46.
Snow, C. P. (1936). The enjoyment of science. Spectator, 156, 1074-1074.
47.
Snow, C. P. (1956, October 6). The two cultures. New Statesman and Nation, pp. 413-414.
48.
Snow, C. P. (1958). The men of fission. Holiday, 23, 108-115.
49.
Snow, C. P. (1971). Public affairs. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
50.
Snow, C. P. (1993). The two cultures(Canto edition with preface by Stefan Collini). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1959)
51.
Temple, W. (1916, September 7). Address to the BAAS. Times Educational Supplement, p. 113-113.
52.
Thomson, J. J. (1918). Report of the Committee Appointed by the Prime Minister to enquire into the position of natural science in the education system of Great Britain. London: British Government Printing Office.
53.
Trilling, L. (1965). Beyond culture: Essays on literature and learning. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
54.
Turner, F. (1980). Public science in Britain, 1880-1919. ISIS, 71, 589-608.
55.
Weinberg, S. (1992). Dreams of a final theory. New York: Pantheon.
56.
Whaley, T. (1985). Matthew Arnold and Thomas Huxley: The value of science and literature for a liberal education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
57.
Winner, L. (1996). The gloves come off: Shattered alliances in science and technology studies. In A. Ross (Ed.), Science wars(pp. 102-113). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
58.
Wolpert, L. (1992). The unnatural nature of science. London: Faber and Faber.
