This article critically examines the notion of development and how it has been transformed by concerns about the environment and sustainability. The concept of industrial ecology is explored to clarify the idea of sustainability. Industrial ecology relies on the notion of a circular industrial metabolism as a benchmark to define the notion of sustainability. The problem with modern industrial systems is the linearity of their metabolism, the extensive use of resources, and the generation of waste. To become sustainable, these systems must reduce their use of resources and generate fewer wastes. The idea of a circular industrial metabolism is applied to two models of development: one based on sustainable development as defined in Agenda 21 and relying on globalized production; the second based on local self-sufficiency and small-scale production methods.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Athanasiou, T. (1996). Divided planet: The ecology of rich and poor. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
2.
Cairncross, F. (1995). Green, Inc.: A guide to business and the environment. Washington DC: Island Press.
3.
Chaterjee, P. (1994). The earth brokers: power, politics and world development. London: Routledge.
4.
Commoner. 1971. The closing circle. New York: Knopf.
5.
Costanza, R., et al. (1995). Sustainable trade: A new paradigm. Environment, 37(5), 16-44.
6.
Daly, H. E. (Ed.). (1973). Towards a steady state economy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co.
7.
The Ecologist. (1993). Whose common future?London: Earthscan.
8.
Eden, M., & Parry, J. T. (1996). Land degradation in the tropics. New York: Pinter.
9.
Ekins, P. (2000). Economic growth and environmental sustainability: The prospects for green growth. London: Routledge.
10.
Enos, J. L. (1991). The creation of technological capability in developing countries. New York: International Labour Organization/World Employment Program, Pinter.
11.
Gamser, M. S., Appleton, H., & Carter, N. (1990). Tinker Tiller Technical Change. New York: Bootstrap Press, Intermediate Technology Development Group.
12.
Heaton, G. R., Banks, D., & Ditz, D. W. (1994). Missing links: Technology and environmental improvement in the industrializing world. London: Routledge.
13.
Heintz, R. J., & DeBruyn, S. M. (1992). The environmental Kutzents curve: More than a hypothesis? In D. Eakin & T. Selden (Eds.), Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth, NBER Working Paper No.4248. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
14.
Hirschman, A. O. (1971). A bias for hope: Essays on development and Lating America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Holtz-Eakin, D., Selden, T. (1992). Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. NBER Working Paper No. 4248. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
16.
Kaplinsky, R. (1990). The Economies of small: Appropriate technologies in a changing world. London: IT Publications.
17.
Kutznets, S. (1955, March). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 49, 1-28.
18.
Nakajima, N. (2000, February). Improving the sustainability of materials use and production. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 20(1), 55-70.
Neumeyer, E. (1999). Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
21.
Panayoutou, T. (1993, January). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Geneva: ILO.
22.
Pearce, D. W. (1991). Blueprint 2: Sustaining the world economy. London: Earthscan.
23.
Pearce, D. W. (1995). Blueprint 4:Capturing global environmental value. London: Earthscan.
24.
Pearce D. W. (1997). Sustainable development: Economics and environment in the third world. London: Earthscan.
25.
Pearce, D. W., & Atkinson, G. (1993). Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: An indicator of “weak” sustainability. Ecological Economics, 8(2), 103-108.
26.
Radetzki, M. (1992). Economic growth and the environment. In P. Low (Ed.), International trade and the environment, 159, 121-132.
27.
Reddy, A. C. (1996). A Macro Perspective on Technology Transfer. Westport, CT: Quorum.
28.
Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Schmidheiny, S., & the Business Council for Sustainable Development. (1992). Changing course: A global perspective on development and the environment, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
Schumacher, E. F. (1974). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. London: Abacus.
31.
Schumacher, E. F. (1978). A guide for the perplexed. London: Abacus.
32.
Shiva, V. (1994). Monocultures of the mind. London: South End Press.
33.
Shiva, V. (1997). Biopiracy. London: South End Press.
34.
Socolow, R., Andrews, C., Berkhout, F., & Thomas, V. (Eds.). (1994). Industrial ecology and global change. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Udoh, J. V. (1996). Sustainable development in third world societies: Applied and theoretical perspectives. Westport CT: Praeger.
36.
Vanderburg, W. H. (2000). The labyrinth of technology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
37.
Van Der Ryn, S. (1995). Ecological design. Washington, DC: Island Press.
38.
World Bank (1997). Expanding the measure of wealth: Indicators of environmentally sustainable development, Washington DC: Author.
