Reading is a unique human skill. Several brain networks involved in this complex skill mainly involve the left hemisphere language areas. Nevertheless, nonlinguistic networks found in the right hemisphere also seem to be involved in sentence and text reading. These areas do not deal with phonological information, but are involved in verbal and nonverbal pattern information processing. The right hemisphere is responsible for global processing of a scene, which is needed for developing reading skills.
Aims:
Caffeine seems to affect global pattern processing specifically. Consequently, our aim was to discover if it could enhance text reading skill.
Methods:
In two mechanistic studies (n=24 and n=53), we tested several reading skills, global and local perception, alerting, spatial attention and executive functions, as well as rapid automatised naming and phonological memory, using a double-blind, within-subjects, repeated-measures design in typical young adult readers.
Results:
A single dose of 200 mg caffeine improved global processing, without any effect on local information processing, alerting, spatial attention and executive or phonological functions. This improvement in global processing was accompanied by faster text reading speed of meaningful sentences, whereas single word/pseudoword or pseudoword text reading abilities were not affected. These effects of caffeine on reading ability were enhanced by mild sleep deprivation.
Conclusions:
These findings show that a small quantity of caffeine could improve global processing and text reading skills in adults.
AdanAPratGSànchez-TuretM (2008) Early effects of caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee on subjective state and gender differences. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry32: 1698–1703.
2.
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). 5th ed.Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
3.
AratoMFrecskaEMacCrimmonDJ, et al. (1991) Serotonergic interhemispheric asymmetry: Neurochemical and pharmaco-EEG evidence. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry15: 759–764.
BertoniSFranceschiniSRonconiL, et al. (2019) Is excessive visual crowding causally linked to developmental dyslexia?Neuropsychologia130: 107–117.
6.
BreznitzZShaulSHorowitz-KrausT, et al. (2013) Enhanced reading by training with imposed time constraint in typical and dyslexic adults. Nat Commun4: 1486.
7.
BriceCFSmithAP (2001) Caffeine levels in saliva: Associations with psychosocial factors and behavioural effects. Hum Psychopharmacol16: 507–521.
8.
BrunyéTTMahoneyCRRappDN, et al. (2012) Caffeine enhances real-world language processing: Evidence from a proofreading task. J Exp Psychol Appl18: 95–108.
9.
CaldwellJACaldwellJLSchmidtRM (2008) Alertness management strategies for operational contexts. Sleep Med Rev12: 257–273.
10.
CarrollJMSolityJShapiroL R (2016) Predicting dyslexia using prereading skills: The role of sensorimotor and cognitive abilities. J Child Psychol Psychiatry57: 750–758.
11.
CheeMWTanJC (2010) Lapsing when sleep deprived: Neural activation characteristics of resistant and vulnerable individuals. Neuroimage51: 835–843.
12.
ChiappePSiegelLSWade-WoolleyL (2002) Linguistic diversity and the development of reading skills: A longitudinal study. Sci Stud Read6: 369–400.
13.
CostanzoFMenghiniDCaltagironeC, et al. (2012) High frequency rTMS over the left parietal lobule increases non-word reading accuracy. Neuropsychologia50: 2645–2651.
14.
DehaeneSCohenLMoraisJ, et al. (2015) Illiterate to literate: Behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition. Nat Rev Neurosci16: 234–244.
15.
DelisDCRobertsonLCEfronR (1986) Hemispheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli. Neuropsychologia24: 205–214.
16.
DohertyMSmithPM (2005) Effects of caffeine ingestion on rating of perceived exertion during and after exercise: A meta-analysis. Scand J Med Sci Spor15: 69–78.
17.
EinötherSJGiesbrechtT (2013) Caffeine as an attention enhancer: Reviewing existing assumptions. Psychopharmacology225: 251–274.
18.
EkstrandCNeudorfJGouldL, et al. (2019) Where words and space collide: The overlapping neural activation of lexical and sublexical reading with voluntary and reflexive spatial attention. Brain Res1706: 1–12.
19.
FacoettiATrussardiANRuffinoM, et al. (2010) Multisensory spatial attention deficits are predictive of phonological decoding skills in developmental dyslexia. J Cognitive Neurosci22: 1011–1025.
20.
FanJMcCandlissBDSommerT, et al. (2002) Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. J Cognitive Neurosci14: 340–347.
21.
FerréS (2008) An update on the mechanisms of the psychostimulant effects of caffeine. J Neurochem105: 1067–1079.
22.
FloryCDGilbertJ (1943) The effects of benzedrine sulphate and caffeine citrate on the efficiency of college students. J Appl Psychol27: 121–134.
23.
FranceschiniSBertoniSGianesiniT, et al. (2017) A different vision of dyslexia: Local precedence on global perception. Sci Rep7: 17462.
24.
FranceschiniSBertoniSRonconiL, et al. (2016) “Batteria De.Co.Ne. per la lettura” strumenti per la valutazione delle abilità di lettura nelle scuole primarie di primo grado. Dislessia13: 319–347.
25.
FranceschiniSGoriSRuffinoM, et al. (2012) A causal link between visual spatial attention and reading acquisition. Curr Biol22: 814–819.
26.
FredholmBBBättigKHolménJ, et al. (1999) Actions of caffeine in the brain with special reference to factors that contribute to its widespread use. Pharmacol Rev51: 83–133.
27.
GoriSSeitzARRonconiL, et al. (2016) Multiple causal links between magnocellular-dorsal pathway deficit and developmental dyslexia. Cereb Cortex26: 4356–4369.
28.
GreenCSBavelierDKramerAF, et al. (2019) Improving methodological standards in behavioral interventions for cognitive enhancement. J Cogn Enhanc3: 2–29.
29.
GrossmanGHMistlbergerREAntleMC, et al. (2000) Sleep deprivation stimulates serotonin release in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Neuroreport11: 1929–1932.
HeckmanMAWeilJDe MejiaEG (2010) Caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine) in foods: A comprehensive review on consumption, functionality, safety, and regulatory matters. J Food Sci75: R77–R87.
32.
HochsteinSAhissarM (2002) View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron36: 791–804.
33.
HoeftFMcCandlissBDBlackJM, et al. (2011) Neural systems predicting long-term outcome in dyslexia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A108: 361–366.
34.
Horowitz-KrausTGraingerMDiFrancescoM, et al. (2015) Right is not always wrong: DTI and fMRI evidence for the reliance of reading comprehension on language-comprehension networks in the right hemisphere. Brain Imaging Behav9: 19–31.
35.
Horowitz-KrausTVannestJJKadisD, et al. (2014) Reading acceleration training changes brain circuitry in children with reading difficulties. Brain Behav4: 886–902.
KauffmannLRamanoëlSPeyrinC (2014) The neural bases of spatial frequency processing during scene perception. Front Integr Neurosci8: 37.
38.
LazzariRPancheriP (1980) STAI Questionario di autovalutazione dell’ansia di stato e di tratto. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
39.
LindeL (1994) An auditory attention task: A note on the processing of verbal information. Percept Motor Skill78: 563–570.
40.
LongordoFKoppCLüthiA (2009) Consequences of sleep deprivation on neurotransmitter receptor expression and function. Eur J Neurosci29: 1810–1819.
41.
MahoneyCRBrunyéTTGilesG, et al. (2011) Caffeine-induced physiological arousal accentuates global processing biases. Pharmacol Biochem Behav99: 59–65.
42.
MartinezAMosesPFrankL, et al. (1997) Hemispheric asymmetries in global and local processing: Evidence from fMRI. Neuroreport8: 1685–1689.
43.
McLellanTMCaldwellJALiebermanHR (2016) A review of caffeine’s effects on cognitive, physical and occupational performance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev71: 294–312.
44.
MesulamMM (1990) Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Ann Neurol28: 597–613.
45.
NavonD (1977) Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn Psychology9: 353–383.
46.
NehligA (2004) Coffee, Tea, Chocolate, and the Brain. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
47.
NehligADavalJLDebryG (1992) Caffeine and the central nervous system: Mechanisms of action, biochemical, metabolic and psychostimulant effects. Brain Res Rev17: 139–170.
48.
PetersJLDe LosaLBavinEL, et al. (2019) Efficacy of dynamic visuo-attentional interventions for reading in dyslexic and neurotypical children: A systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev100: 58–76.
49.
PosnerMIWalkerJAFriedrichFJ, et al. (1984) Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. J Neurosci4: 1863–1874.
50.
ProverbioAMMinnitiAZaniA (1998) Electrophysiological evidence of a perceptual precedence of global vs. local visual information. Cogn Brain Res6: 321–334.
51.
RonconiLBassoDGoriS, et al. (2012) TMS on right frontal eye fields induces an inflexible focus of attention. Cereb Cortex24: 396–402.
52.
RuxtonCHS (2008) The impact of caffeine on mood, cognitive function, performance and hydration: A review of benefits and risks. Nutr Bull33: 15–25.
53.
SergentJ (1982) The cerebral balance of power: Confrontation or cooperation?J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform8: 253–272.
54.
Serra-GrabulosaJMAdanAFalcónC, et al. (2010) Glucose and caffeine effects on sustained attention: An exploratory fMRI study. Hum Psychopharmacol25: 543–552.
55.
ShaywitzSShaywitzBWietechaL, et al. (2017) Effect of atomoxetine treatment on reading and phonological skills in children with dyslexia or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and comorbid dyslexia in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Child Adol Psychop27: 19–28.
56.
SmithA (2002) Effects of caffeine on human behavior. Food Chem Toxicol40: 1243–1255.
57.
SmithAP (2011) Caffeine: Practical implications. In: RBKanarekHRLieberman (eds) Diet, Brain, Behavior: Practical Implications. Taylor & Francis, pp. 271–292.
58.
SmithABriceCNashJ, et al. (2003) Caffeine and central noradrenaline: Effects on mood, cognitive performance, eye movements and cardiovascular function. J Psychopharmacol17: 283–292.
59.
SmithAKendrickAMabenA, et al. (1994) Effects of breakfast and caffeine on cognitive performance, mood and cardiovascular functioning. Appetite22: 39–55.
60.
SnowlingMJNashHMGoochDC, et al. (2019) Developmental outcomes for children at high risk of dyslexia and children with Developmental Language Disorder. Child Dev90: e548–e564.
61.
SongYHakodaY (2012) The interference of local over global information processing in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder of the inattentive type. Brain Dev34: 308–317.
62.
StellaGTintoniC (2007) Indagine e rilevazione sulle abilità di lettura nelle scuole secondarie di secondo grado. Dislessia4: 271–285.
63.
Van DantzigSPecherDZeelenbergR, et al. (2008) Perceptual processing affects conceptual processing. Cogn Sci32: 579–590.
64.
Van der HallenREversKBrewaeysK, et al. (2015) Global processing takes time: A meta-analysis on local–global visual processing in ASD. Psychol Bull141: 549–573.
65.
VigneauMBeaucousinVHervéPY, et al. (2011) What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing? Insights from a meta-analysis. Neuroimage54: 577–593.
66.
WeissBLatiesVG (1962) Enhancement of human performance by caffeine and the amphetamines. Pharmacol Rev14: 1–36.
67.
WeissmanDHBanichMT (1999) Global–local interference modulated by communication between the hemispheres. J Exp Psychol Gen128: 283–308.
68.
WeissmanDHRobertsKCVisscherKM, et al. (2006) The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention. Nat Neurosci9: 971–978.
69.
WeissmanDHWoldorffMG (2004) Hemispheric asymmetries for different components of global/local attention occur in distinct temporo-parietal loci. Cereb Cortex15: 870–876.
70.
YamaguchiSYamagataSKobayashiS (2000) Cerebral asymmetry of the “top-down” allocation of attention to global and local features. J Neurosci20: RC72–RC72.
71.
ZagoLPetitLTurbelinMR, et al. (2008) How verbal and spatial manipulation networks contribute to calculation: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia46: 2403–2414.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
