Abstract
To better understand homicide, 28 women convicted of the crime of murder were interviewed in three American prisons. The data were characterized into a typology of delayed, reactive, and intentional murder responses. From the descriptions of the delayed and reactive respondents, a continuum of imminent danger existed in their daily lives suggesting that homicide was seen as an event which utilized reasonable force as a last resort to end an abusive relationship with partners, children, parents, or others, occurring after a progression of interactions. One implication of this finding is that these women have a different understanding of their crime than legal officials and jury members suggesting that the American legal system itself may possess a gender disparity within its law. Recommendations emerging from this implication include a recognition of battered wife syndrome as a legal defense for self-defense and the redefinition of relevant legal policies in keeping with the reality of today's at-risk communities. Future research is called for to examine the relationship between mandatory arrest and domestic violence calls.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
