BassiouniM.Ch. (ed.) — International Protection of Crime Victims, Eres ed. 1986.
2.
FattahE.A. (ed.) (1986). From Crime Policy to Victim Policy, London.
3.
HirschH.J. (1990). Wiedergutmachung des Schadens in Rahmen materiellen Strafrecht, ZStW, 102.
4.
JoutsenM. (1987). The Role of the Victim in European Criminal Justice Systems. HEUNI, Helsinki.
5.
JoutsenM. (1991). Changing Victim Policy: International Dimensions. Victims and Criminal Justice, 2, 52. Freiburg.
6.
JungH. (1990). Die Compensation order in Grossbritannien. In Neue Wege der Wiedergutmachung im Strafrecht (KaiserG.MadlenerK., eds.). Freiburg.
7.
KellyD. (1990). Victim Participation in the Criminal Justice System. In Victims of Crime. Problems, Policies, and Programs (LurigooG.SkoganA.DavisE., eds.). Sage, London.
8.
KilliasM. (1990). Victim-Related Alternatives to the Criminal Justice System: Compensation, Restitution, and Mediation. In Crime and Criminal Policy in Europe (KaiserG.AlbrechtH.J., eds.). Max-Planck-Institute for Comparative and Penal Law; Feiburg.
9.
MaguireM.ShaplandJ. (1990). The “Victim movements' in Europe”. In Victims of Crime. Lurigio et al pp. 205–225. London.
10.
MarekA. (1992). Überlegungen zur Wiedergutmachung imn polnischen und deutschen Strafrechtssystem. Monatschrift für Kriminology2.
11.
MarekA. (1993). Die Rechtsstellung des Verbrechensopfers in polnischen und deutschen Straftssystem aus rechtsvergleichender Sicht. In Festschrift für W. Stree and J. Wessels (Hrsg. KüperW.WelpJ., eds.). C.F. Müller Juristischer Verlag: Heidelberg.
12.
McDonaldW. (ed.) (1976). Criminal Justice and the Victim. Sage, Beverly Hills, London.
13.
Müllet-DietzH. (1991). Compensation as Criminal Penalty? In Victims and Criminal Justice, vol. 51. Max-Planck-Institute for Comparative and Penal Law; Freiburg.
14.
RoxinC. (1989). Die Stellung des Opfers im Strafsystem. Recht und Politik, 4.
15.
SchneiderH.J. (1991). Restitution instead of Punishment — Reorientation of Crime Prevention and , Criminal Justice in the Context of Development. In Victims and Criminal Justice, vol. 51. Max-Planck-Institute for Comparative and Penal Law; Freiburg.
16.
SeelmannK. (1987). Paradoxien der Opferorientierung im Strafrecht, Juristenzeitung.
17.
ShaplandJ. (1990). Commentary on Some Fundamental Dilemmas. In Crime and Criminal Policy in Europe. Max-Planck-Institute for Comparative and Penal Law; Freiburg.
18.
WeigendTh. (1990). Restitution in den USA. In Neue Wege der Wiedergutmachung. (EserA.KaiserG.MadlenerK., eds.). Max-Planck-Institute for Comparative and Penal Law; Freiburg.
19.
WeitekampE. (1991). Recent Developments on Restitution and Victim—Offender Reconciliation in the USA and Canada. In Victims and Criminal Justice, vol. 51. Max-Planck-Institute for Comparative and Penal Law; Freiburg.