In the last few years, the crime victim has moved into the forefront of criminological research and criminal justice policy. This is a worldwide development. In many countries, including the Federal Republic of Germany, victim protection and victim compensation laws have been enacted. The extent to which such legal steps effect an actual improvement of the victims' situation remains largely unexamined. This paper presents the results of a German research project which examined the influence of the recently revised German victim protection law upon criminal law practice. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers were surveyed. A clear resistance by judges and prosecutors was discerned relative to implementing the victim protection rights. For them, the victim is still an outsider and a ‘trouble maker’ within the criminal proceedings. They see increased victim attention as involving additional trouble, effort, time, and possibly creating longer delays in proceedings. In contrast, the attitudes of the attorneys were more favorable toward including the victim in the criminal justice process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnoldH.TeskeR.H.C.KorinekL. (1988). Viktimisierung, Verbrechensfurcht und Einstellungen zur Sozialkontrolle in West und Ost. In Kriminologische Forschung in den 80er Jahren. (KaiserG.KuryH.AlbrechtH.-J. eds.) pp. 909–942. Kriminologische Forschungsberichte aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht, Bd. 53/2. Freiburg i. Brsg.: Eigenverlag Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht.
2.
EliasR. (1990). Which victim movement? The politics of victim policy. In Victims of Crime. (LurigioA.J.SkoganW.G.DavisR.C. eds.) pp. 226–250. Sage: Newbury Park, California,
3.
ErezE. (1990). Victim participation in sentencing: rhetoric and reality. Journal of Criminal Justice, 18, 19–31.
4.
FattahE.A. (ed.) (1986). From Crime Policy to Victim Policy. London; Macmillan.
5.
GeisG. (1990). Crime victims: practices and prospects. In Victims of Crime (LurigioA.J.SkoganW.G.DavisR.C., eds.), pp. 251–268. Sage; Newbury Park, California.
6.
HammerJ.H. (1989). The effect of offender punishment on crime victim's recovering and perceived fairness (equity) and process control. Published dissertation. Ann Arbor; Michigan.
7.
HillenkampT. (1986). The influence of victim behaviour on the dogmatic judgement of the offence: Some remarks on the relationship between victimology and the dogmatics of penal law. In Victimology in Comparative Perspective (MiyazawaK.OhyaM., eds.): pp. 111–129. Seibundo Publishing, Tokyo.
8.
HornE. (1987). Kriminalpolitische Tendenzen im Strafrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In Neuere Tendenzen der Kriminalpolitik (EserA.CornilsK., eds.) pp. 147–159. Freiburg: Eigenverlag Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht.
9.
HudsonP.S. (1984). The crime victim and the criminal justice system: time for a change. Pepperdine Law Review., 11, 23–62.
10.
JoutsenM. (1987). The Role of the Victim of Crime in European Criminal Justice Systems: A Crossnational Study of the Role of the Victim. Helsinki Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, affiliated with the United Nations. Publication Series No. 11. Helsinki.
11.
KaiserG. (1979). Viktimologie an der schwelle der 80er Jahre — ein kritisches Resumee. In Das Verbrechensopfer (KirchhoffG.F.SessarK., eds.) pp. 481–496. Bochum; Studienverlag Dr. Brockmeyer.
12.
KaiserG. (1988). Kriminologie. Ein Lehrbuch. 2. Auflage. C.F. Müller; Heidelberg.
13.
KaiserM. (1991). Die Stellung des Verletzten im Strafverfahren — Implementation und Evaluation des ‘Opferschutzgesetzes’. Eigenverlag Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationals Strafrecht, Freiburg.
14.
KernerH.-J. (1985). Die Wiedereinsetzung des Opfers also Subjekt des (Straf-)Rechts. In Verbrechensopfer, Sozialarbeit und Justiz (JanssenH.KernerH.-J., eds.) pp. 495–522. Bonn-Bad Godesberg.
15.
KilpatrickD.G.OttoR.K. 91987). Constitutionally guaranteed participation in criminal proceeding for victims: potential effects on psychological functioning. Wayne Law Review, 817–31.
16.
KuhnT.S. (1973). Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen. Suhrkamp; Frankfurt/M.
17.
MaguireM.ShaplandJ. (1990). The ‘Victims Movement’ in Europe. In Victims of Crime (LurigioA.J.SkoganW.G.DavisR.C., eds.) pp. 205–225. Sage; Newbury Park, California.
18.
McDonaldW.F. (1982). The victim's role in the American administration of criminal justice: Some developments and findings. in The Victim in International Perspective (SchneiderH.J., ed.) pp. 397–402. de Gruyter; New York.
19.
RubelH.C. (1986). Victim participation in sentencing proceedings. Criminal Law Quarterly, 28, 226–250.
20.
SchneiderH.J. (1982). Der gegenwärtige Stand der Viktimologie in der Welt. In Das Verbrechensopfer in der Strafrechtspflege(SchneiderH.J., ed.) pp. 9–44. de Gruyter; Berlin, New York.
21.
SessarK. (1990). Tertiary victimization: A case of the politically abused crime victims. In Criminal Justice, Restitution, and Reconciliation (GalawayB.HudsonJ., eds.) pp. 37–45. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey; New York.
22.
VesterF. (1980). Neuland des Denkens.. Deutsche Verlagsanstalt; Stuttgart.
23.
VillmoareE.NetoV. (1987). Victim Appearances at Sentencing under California's Victims' Bill of Rights. National Institute of Justice; Washington, D.C.
24.
VillmowB. (1986). The application of the victim compensation act in the Federal Republic of Germany. In Victimology in Comparative Perspective (MiyazawaK.OhyaM., eds.) pp. 422–429. Seibundo Publishing, Tokyo.
25.
WallerI. (1985). Die Auswirkungen von Straftaten auf deren Opfer. In Verbrechensopfer, Sozialarbeit und justiz (JanssenH.KernerH.-J., eds.) pp. 45–77. Bonn-Bad Godesberg.
26.
WallerI. (1986). Crime victims not to be orphans of social policy: needs, services and reforms. In Victimology in Comparative Perspective (MiyazawaK.OhyaM., eds.) pp. 302–322. Seibundo Publishing; Tokyo.
27.
WatzlawickP. (1988). Münchhausens Zopf oder Psychotherapie und ‘Wirklichkeit’. Bern et al.: Huber.
28.
WeigendTh. (1989). Deliktsopfer und Strafverfahren. Duncker and Humblot; Berlin.
29.
WortmanC.B. (1983). Coping with victimization: conclusions and implications for future research. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 195–221.
30.
WulfR. (1985). Opferbezogene Strafverfolgung — Plädoyer für ein neues Verhältnis zwischen Staatsanwalt(schaft) und Verbrechensopfer(n) nach geltendem Recht. In Verbrechensopfer, Sozialarbeit und Justiz (JanssenH.KernerH.-J., eds.) pp. 437–470. Bad Godesberg; Bonn.
