The costs of crime to victims are well-known and research has described the physical, emotional, and financial injuries sustained by crime victims. To date, however, there has been little empirical work which investigates the correlates of victim distress vis-à-vis victim involvement in the criminal justice process. The present study explores the role played by the criminal justice experience in victim distress level and the relative importance of victim, offense, and system participation variables. Multivariate analysis revealed that the level of distress following the victimization is largely a function of offense type, victim perception of sentence severity, and victim demographic characteristics of sex and age. Investigation of the factors predictive of current victim distress level indicated that receiving restitution and the level of distress following the victimization are most important, in addition to the personal characteristics of race and marital status. The implications of these findings for research on victim participation and for policy concerning crime victims are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BardM.SangreyD.(1986). The Crime Victim's Book. Brunner/Mazel; New York.
2.
CasperJ.D.(1978). Having their day in court: defendant evaluations of the fairness of their treatment. Law and Society Review, 12, 237–251.
3.
CasperJ.D.TyperT.FisherB.(1988). Procedural justice in felony cases. Law and Society Review, 22, 483–507.
4.
CookR.F.SmithB.E.HarrellA.V.(1987). Helping Crime Victims: Levels of Trauma and Effectiveness of Services. U.S. Department of Justice; National Institute of Justice.
5.
DavisJ.A.SmithT.W.(1991). General Social Surveys, 1972–1991: Cumulative codebook. National Opinion Research Center; Chicago.
6.
DavisR.C.(1983). Victim/witness non-cooperation: a second look at a persistent phenomenon. Journal of Criminal Justice, 11, 233–287.
7.
DavisR.C.(1987). Crime Victims: Learning How To Help Them. NIJ, U.S. Department of Justice, (Research in Action). NIJ Reports, no. 203, May/June.
8.
ErezE.(1989). The impact of victimology on criminal justice policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 3, 236–256.
9.
ErezE.(1990). Victim participation in sentencing: rhetoric and reality. Journal of Criminal Justice, 18, 19–31.
10.
ErezE.TontodonatoP.(1990). The effect of victim participation in sentencing on sentence outcome. Criminology, 28, 451–474.
11.
ErezE.TontodonatoP.(1992). Victim participation in sentencing and satisfaction with justice. Justice Quarterly, 9,393–417.
12.
FattahE.A.(1986). From Crime Policy to Victim Policy. St. Martin; New York.
13.
ForstB.F.HernonJ.C.(1985). The Criminal Justice Response to Victim Harm. U.S. Department of Justice, NIJ (Research in Brief), June.
14.
FriedmanK.BischoffH.DavisR.PersonA.(1982). Victims and Helpers: Reactions to Crime. U.S. Department of Justice; National Institute of Justice.
15.
GoldsteinA.S.(1982). Defining the role of the victim in criminal prosecution. Mississippi Law Journal, 52, 515–561.
16.
HaganJ.(1982). Victims before the law: a study of victims’ involvement in the criminal justice process. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 73, 317–329.
17.
HammerJ.H.(1989). The effect of offender punishment on crime victims’ recovery and perceived fairness (equity) and process control. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI.
18.
HeckmanJ.J.(1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475–492.
19.
HeckmanJ.J.(1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.
20.
HoffmanM.(1983). Victim impact statements. Western State University Law Review, 10, 221–228.
21.
Janoff-BulmanR.FriezeI.H.(1983). A theoretical perspective for understanding reactions to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 1–17.
22.
KellyD.P. (1984a). Delivering legal services to victims: an evaluation and prescription. Justice System Journal, 9, 62–85.
23.
KellyD.P.(1984b). Victims’ perceptions of criminal justice. Pepperdine Law Review, 11, 15–22.
24.
KellyD.P.(1987). Victims. Wayne Law Review, 34, 69–86.
25.
KesslerR.C.(1979). Stress, social status and psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 20, 259–272.
26.
KesslerR.C.(1979). Stress, social status and psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 20, 259–272.
27.
KesslerR.C.PriceR.H.WortmanC.B.(1985). Social factors and psychopathology stress, social support and coping processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 531–572.
28.
KiddR.F.ChayetE.F.(1984). Why do victims fail to report? The psychology of criminal victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 39–50.
29.
KilpatrickD.G.OttoR.K.(1987). Constitutionally guaranteed participation in criminal proceedings for victims: potential effects on psychological functioning. Wayne Law Review, 34, 7–28.
30.
KnudtenR.D.MeadeA.KnudtenM.DoernerW.(1976). The victim in the administration of criminal justice: problem and perceptions. In Criminal Justice and the Victim (McDonaldWilliam F., ed.) pp. 115–146. Sage; Beverly Hills, CA.
31.
LambornL.L.(1985). The impact of victimology on the criminal law in the United States. Canadian Community Law Journal, 8, 23–43.
32.
LurigioA.J.ResickP.A.(1990). Healing the psychological wounds of criminal victimization: predicting postcrime distress and recovery. In Victims of Crime: Problems, Policies, and Programs (LurigioA.J.SkoganW.G.DavisR.C., eds.) pp. 50–68. Sage; Newbury Park, CA.
33.
McDonaldW.F. (ed.) (1976). Criminal Justice and the Victim. Sage; Beverly Hills, CA.
34.
McLeodM.(1986). Victim participation at sentencing. Criminal Law Bulletin, 22, 501–507.
35.
National Organization for Victim Assistance (NOVA) (1985). Victims’ Rights and Services: A Legislative Directory. Washington D.C.
36.
PerloffL.S.(1983). Perceptions of vulnerability to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 41–61.
37.
RadloffL.S.(1977). The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychology Measurement, 1, 385–401.
38.
RosenbergM.(1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Princeton University Press; Princeton.
39.
ShaplandJ.WillmoreJ.DuffP.(1985). The Victim in the Criminal Justice System. Gower; Brookfield, VT.
40.
SmithD.A.WishE.D.JarjouraG.R.(1980). Drug use and pretrial misconduct in New York City. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5, 101–126.
41.
TylerT.R.(1988). What is procedural justice? criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law and Society Review, 22, 103–135.
42.
WallerI.(1983). Declaration on the protection and assistance of crime victims. Victimology Newsletter, 3, 1–7.
43.
WellingS.N.(1987). Victim participation in plea bargains. Washington University Law Quarterly, 65, 301–356.
44.
WellingS.N.(1988). Victims in the criminal process: a utilitarian analysis of victim participation in the charging decision. Arizona Law Review, 30, 85–117.
45.
WolfgangM.E.FiglioR.M.TracyP.E.SingerS.J.(1985). The National Survey of Crime Severity. Bureau of Justice Statistics. U.S. Department of Justice; Washington, D.C.
46.
WortmanC.B.(1983). Coping with victimization: conclusion and implication for future research. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 195–221.
47.
YoungM.A.(1987). A constitutional amendment for victims of crime: the victim's perspective. Wayne Law Review, 34, 51–68.
48.
ZehrH.UmbreitM.H.(1982). Victim offender reconciliation: an incarceration substitute?Federal Probation, 46, 63–68.
