Although the literature on online scams reveals the richness of studies in many areas, research on the forms of scam and scammers’ roles during online scam engagement is rare. The current research fills this void by interviewing 15 elder victims of online scams about their experience. The findings show that online scams can be committed individually or as a team, and that the scam can be either victim-initiated contact or fraudster-initiated contact. The analysis of the data reveals four main roles of the scammers (persuader, supporters, manager, and financial person), each of which plays a different but supporting role in order to smoothly convince the victim that their scam is legitimate. The use of information technology (IT) was also found to be a part of the scam mechanism to control and manipulate the victim.
AggarwalBXiongQSchroeder ButterfillE (2020) Impact of the use of the internet on quality of life in older adults: Review of literature. Primary Health Care Research and Development21(e55): 1–6.
2.
BaiSKoongKS (2017) Financial and other frauds in the United States: A panel analysis approach. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management25(4): 413–433.
3.
BolimosIAChooKR (2017) Online fraud offending within an Australian jurisdiction. Journal of Financial Crime24(2): 277–308.
4.
BT BearTai (2024) Exposed: Lured into a scam loan app gang, I risked my life digging an escape back to Thailand [Video]. YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYfsDrNFuTw (accessed 4 December 2025).
5.
BuchananTWhittyMT (2014) The online dating romance scam: Causes and consequences of victimhood. Psychology, Crime and Law20(3): 261–283.
6.
Buil-GilDMiróLlinares-FMonevaA, et al. (2021) Cybercrime and shifts in opportunities during COVID-19: A preliminary analysis in the UK. European Societies23(Suppl. 1): S47–S59.
7.
BurnesDHendersonCRJrSheppardC, et al. (2017) Prevalence of financial fraud and scams among older adults in the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health107(8): e13–e21.
8.
ButtonMNichollsCMKerrJ, et al. (2014) Online frauds: Learning from victims why they fall for these scams. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology47(3): 391–408.
9.
ColucciaAPozzaAFerrettiF, et al. (2020) Online romance scams: Relational dynamics and psychological characteristics of the victims and scammers. A scoping review. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health16: 24–35.
10.
CorreiaSG (2022) Making the most of cybercrime and fraud crime report data: A case study of UK action fraud. International Journal of Population Data Sciences7(1): 1721.
11.
DavisL (2018) Digital literacy among the elderly. Journal of Educational Technology15(1): 22–30.
12.
DeliemaMShadelDPakK (2020) Profiling victims of investment fraud: Mindsets and risky behaviors. Journal of Consumer Research46: 904–914.
13.
Department of Older Persons (2022) Situation of the Thai Older Persons 2022. Bangkok, Thailand: Amarin Company Cooperation.
14.
DoveM (2018) The voices of scam victims: A psychological model of the experience of fraud: Chapter from predicting individual differences in vulnerability to fraud. Doctoral dissertation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3616326 (accessed 4 December 2025).
15.
EmamiCSmithRGJornaP (2019) Predicting online fraud victimisation in Australisa. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice577: 1–20.
16.
GrimesGAHoughMGMazurE, et al. (2010) Older adults’ knowledge of internet hazards. Educational Gerontology36(3): 173–192.
17.
JonesHSTowseJNRaceN, et al. (2019) Email fraud: The search for psychological predictors of susceptibility. PLoS One14(1): e0209684.
18.
JudgesRAGallantSNYangL, et al. (2017) The role of cognition, personality, and trust in fraud victimization in older adults. Frontiers in Psychology8: 588.
19.
KircanskiKNotthoffNDeLiemaM, et al. (2018) Emotional arousal may increase susceptibility to fraud in older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging33(2): 325–337.
KoningLJungerMVeldkampB (2024) Risk factors for fraud victimization: The role of socio-demographics, personality, mental, general, and cognitive health, activities, and fraud knowledge. International Review of Victimology30(3): 443–479.
22.
KoongKSLiuLCQinH, et al. (2017) Occurrences of online fraud complaints: 2002 through 2015. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management25(4): 484–504.
23.
LazarusSWhittakerJMMcGuireMR, et al. (2023) What do we know about online romance fraud studies? A systematic review of the empirical literature (2000 to 2021). Journal of Economic Criminology2: 100013.
24.
LichtenbergPASugarmanMAPaulsonD, et al. (2016) Psychological and functional vulnerability predicts fraud cases in older adults: Results of a longitudinal study. Clinical Gerontologist39(1): 48–63.
25.
Manager Online (2025a) Chinese media analysis: Why the power-and-Internet cut cannot stop call center gang? Available at: https://mgronline.com/china/detail/9680000013635 (accessed 11 March 2025).
MolinaJACampañaJCOrtegaR (2016) Internet and the elderly in Spain: Time dedicated to search and communications (Munich personal RePEc archive, paper no. 74419). Available at: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/74419/ (accessed 14 April 2024).
28.
National Statistical Office Ministry (2022) A Summary of the Use of Information and Communication Technology among Elderly People in 2022. Bangkok, Thailand: National statistical Office, Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. Available at: https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb/storage/survey_detail/2023/20230929102632_92912.pdf (accessed 12 April 2024).
29.
NguyenTLuongHT (2021) The structure of cybercrime networks: Transnational computer fraud in Vietnam. Journal of Crime and Justice44(4): 419–440.
30.
NimrodG (2018) Technophobia among older internet users. Educational Gerontology44(2–3): 148–162.
31.
O’ConnorAMJudgesRALeeK, et al. (2021) Can adults discriminate between fraudulent and legitimate e-mails? Examining the role of age and prior fraud experience. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect33(3): 181–205.
32.
PartiK (2023) What is a capable guardian to older fraud victims? Comparison of younger and older victims’ characteristics of online fraud utilizing routine activity theory. Frontiers in Psychology14: 1118741.
33.
PartiKTahirF (2023) If we don’t listen to them, we make them lose more than money: Exploring reasons for underreporting and the needs of older scam victims. Social Sciences12(5): 264.
34.
RegeA (2009) What’s love got to do with it? Exploring online dating scams and identity fraud. International Journal of Cyber Criminology3(2): 494–512.
35.
RobinsonJEdwardsM (2024) Fraudsters target the elderly: Behavioural evidence from randomised controlled scam-baiting experiments. Security Journal37: 1173–1196.
36.
SaboorMSumSSahafR, et al. (2015) The internet use in elderly people. Medical Gazette/Medicinski Glasnik20(56): 43–52.
37.
SchmallegerF (2012) Criminology Today. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
38.
SeifertADohMWahlHW (2017) They also do it: Internet use by older adults living in residential care facilities. Educational Gerontology43(9): 451–461.
39.
ShaoJDuWLinT, et al. (2019a) Credulity rather than general trust may increase vulnerability to fraud in older adults: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect31(2): 146–162.
40.
ShaoJZhangaQRenaY, et al. (2019b) Why are older adults victims of fraud? Current knowledge and prospects regarding older adults’ vulnerability to fraud. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect31(3): 225–243.
41.
Thai PBS News (2025) Former call center employees swims back to Thailand revealing scamming over 10 million Baht out of victims [Video]. YouTube, 16October. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXv1QKzYzdM
42.
WangSKHuangW (2011) The evolutional view of the types of identity thefts and online frauds in the era of the internet. Internet Journal of Criminology12: 1–21.
43.
WhiteMDMarshEE (2006) Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends55(1): 22–45.
44.
WhittyMT (2013) The scammers persuasive techniques model: Development of a stage model to explain the online dating romance scam. British Journal of Criminology53: 665–684.
45.
WhittyMT (2018) Do you love me? Psychological characteristics of romance scam victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking21(2): 105–109.
46.
WhittyMT (2019) Who can spot an online romance scam?Journal of Financial Crime26(2): 623–633.
47.
WhittyMTBuchananT (2016) The online dating romance scam: The psychological impact on victims – both financial and non-financial. Criminology and Criminal Justice16(2): 176–194.
