This article investigates the manifestations of microaggressions, hate speech, and hate crimes targeting Roma individuals in Romania, situating them within the broader European framework of anti-discrimination and victim protection policies. The study is based on a nationally representative sociological survey, conducted in late 2023 by the Research Institute for Quality of Life (RIQL), Romanian Academy. The findings reveal a persistent gap between Romania’s formal alignment with European Union (EU) regulations and the implementation of protective measures. Despite public awareness of anti-discrimination legislation and compared to the general population, Roma respondents report significantly lower levels of trust in law enforcement and criminal justice institutions and show limited willingness to report microaggressions or hate incidents they were exposed to. Regression analyses highlight the influence of institutional trust, educational attainment, and social intolerance on perceived vulnerability and reporting behaviour. The outcomes underscore the structural nature of anti-Roma discrimination and the need for integrated policy interventions combining institutional reform, civic education, and improved access to justice. This study enriches victimology and ethnic studies by empirically linking hate incidents and discriminatory micro-level experiences with macro-level institutional trust within a post-communist context.
AnghelIM (2015) Contesting neoliberal governance. The case of Romanian Roma. Social Change Review13(2): 85–109.
2.
AnghelIMAlexandrescuFM (2023) ‘We lurk in the hidden places’: The (un) stable spatialisation of Roma poverty in Romania. Urban Studies60(10): 1875–1893.
3.
AppelH (2024) Minority rights, the Roma, and neoliberal reform in EU accession. East European Politics40(1): 21–42.
4.
BotonoguFStănescuSMNicolăescuV, et al. (2011) Comunităţi ascunse: Ferentari. Bucharest: Expert.
5.
BrüggemannCFriedmanE (2017) The decade of Roma inclusion: Origins, actors, and legacies. European Education49(1): 1–9.
6.
CaceSBalicaEMihaiuSMihaiH (2023) Dincolo de prejudecăți și comportamente. Incluziunea socială a romilor. Editura ProUniversitaria, București.
7.
CaceS (coord)BalicaEMihaiuS, et al. (2024) Diferențe și incluziune asimetrică: discriminarea romilor. Bucharest: Pro Universitaria.
8.
CarreraSRostasIVosyliūtėL (2017) Combating institutional anti-gypsyism: Responses and promising practices in the EU and selected member states, CEPS Research Report 2017/08, Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
9.
ChakrabortiNGarlandJ (2015) Hate Crime: Impact, Causes and Responses2nd ed. London: Sage.
10.
ChettyNAlathurS (2018) Hate speech review in the context of online social networks. Aggression and Violent Behavior40: 108–118.
European Court of Human Rights (2019) Lingurar v. Romania. Application No. 48474/14, Judgment of 16 April 2019, final 16 April 2019. Latest Decision: CM/Del/Dec(2021)1406/H46-22. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-192466%22]} (accessed 17 July 2025).
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (2022) Roma in 10 European Countries: Main Results – Roma Survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
18.
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (2023) Roma in 10 European Countries. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
19.
FeketeL (2014) Europe against the Roma. Race & Class55(3): 60–70.
20.
GheorgheN (1991) Roma-Gypsy ethnicity in Eastern Europe. Social Research58(4): 829–844. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40970676 (accessed 24 August 2025).
21.
GuyW (ed.) (2001) Between Past and Future: The Roma of Central and Eastern Europe. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.
22.
HerkiNE (2020) Anti-Roma discourses: The struggle for Roma Holocaust recognition, collective memory and identity. Studia UBB. Europaea65(2): 283–302.
23.
HerkiNE (2022) Radicalizarea discursului românesc despre romi în spațiul public: pandemia, alegerile sau AUR?Anuarul Institutului de Istorie „George Bariţiu’ din Cluj-Napoca. Series Historica61: 1621–634.
24.
HockenosP (2013) Free to Hate: The Rise of the Right in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. New York: Routledge.
25.
HowardE (2018) EU anti-discrimination law: Has the CJEU stopped moving forward?International Journal of Discrimination and the Law18(2–3): 60–81.
26.
IlieSRusuMTomaS, et al. (2012) Roma Inclusion in Romania: Policies, Institutions and Examples. Constanta: Soros Foundation.
27.
IonescuMStănescuSM (2014) Public Policies for Roma. Bucharest: Pro Universitaria.
28.
LancioneM (2019) The politics of embodied urban precarity: Roma people and the fight for housing in Bucharest, Romania. Geoforum101: 182–191.
29.
McGarryA (2012) The dilemma of the European Union’s Roma policy. Critical Social Policy32(1): 126–136.
MatacheM (2014) The deficit of EU democracies: A new cycle of violence against Roma population. Human Rights Quarterly36(2): 325–348.
33.
MatacheM (2017) Biased elites, unfit policies: Reflections on the lacunae of Roma integration strategies. European Review25(4): 588–607.
34.
MatacheMOehlkeK (2017) A critical analysis of Roma policy and praxis: The Romanian case. In: MatacheMMirgaABhabhaJ (eds) Realizing Roma Rights. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 97–114.
35.
MihaiuS (2023) Discriminarea romilor. In: CaceSBalicaEMihaiuS (coord) (eds) Dincolo de prejudecăți și comportamente. Incluziunea socială a romilor. Bucharest: Pro Universitaria, pp. 84–102.
36.
MolnarL (2021) The law of the jungle. The online hate-speech against the Roma in Romania. Victims & Offenders16(8): 1108–1129.
37.
MolnarL (2023) The imperative need for criminological research on the European Roma: A narrative review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse24(2): 1016–1031.
38.
MolnarLChopinJHashimotoYZ, et al. (2024) Towards a multifactorial framework of the Roma’s victimisation: Discrimination, risky situations, and acceptance of violence as correlates of physical assault and harassment. International Review of Victimology30(3): 480–502.
39.
NaydenovaVMatarazzoM (2019) Post-2020 EU Roma Strategy: The Way Forward. New York: Open Society Foundations, pp. 1–44.
40.
OroszGBruneauETroppLR, et al. (2018) What predicts anti-Roma prejudice? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of everyday sentiments about the Roma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology48(6): 317–328.
PowellRLeverJ (2017) Europe’s perennial ‘outsiders’: A processual approach to Roma stigmatization and ghettoization. Current Sociology65(5): 680–699.
44.
SaleemHMDillonKPBeneschS, et al. (2017) A web of hate: Tackling hateful speech in online social spaces. arXiv [Preprint]. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.10159 (accessed 8 March 2025).
45.
SimhandlK (2006) Western gypsies and travellers–’Eastern Roma’: The creation of political objects by the institutions of the European Union. Nations and Nationalism12(1): 97–115.
46.
SurduL (2010) Mecanismele de construcţie şi deconstrucţie a stigmatizării, în cazul romilor din România. Calitatea Vieţii21(1–2): 51–70.
47.
SurduMKovatsM (2015) Roma identity as an expert-political construction. Social Inclusion3(5): 5–18.
48.
TimukaiteABuil-GilD (2024) Trust in the police and crime reporting: Reassessing assumptions in the context of violent crime in England and Wales. International Review of Victimology31(2): 265–284.
UslanerEM (2016) Disasters, trust, and social cohesion. Ritsumeikan Language Culture Study28(2): 183–191.
51.
Van BaarH (2011) Europe’s Romaphobia: Problematization, securitization, nomadization. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space29(2): 203–212.
52.
Van KesterenJ (2016) Assessing the risk and prevalence of hate crime victimization in Western Europe. International Review of Victimology22(2): 139–160.
53.
VermeerschP (2012) Reframing the Roma: EU initiatives and the politics of reinterpretation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies38(8): 1195–1212.
54.
ZamfirCZamfirE (1993) Ţiganii între ignorare şi îngrijorare. Bucharest: Alternative.
