This paper explores forced marriage, a form of gender-based violence affecting women and girls worldwide. It employs a comparative approach, beginning with the victim-centred focus outlined in the Istanbul Convention. The paper analyses forced marriage data and legislative frameworks in Germany, Spain, Finland, and Ireland. It concludes that more empirical research is needed for effective prevention and recommends a shift from criminal to civil and family law, as the current approach overly narrows the concept of forced marriage. Enhanced institutional attention across all four countries is also crucial for ensuring victims’ access to justice.
AnithaSGillAK (2009) Coercion, consent and the forced marriage debate in the UK. Feminist Legal Studies17(2): 165–184.
3.
AnithaSGillAK (2011) Reconceptualising consent and coercion within an intersectional understanding of forced marriage. In: GillAKAnithaS (eds) Forced Marriage: Introducing a Social Justice and Human Rights Perspective. London: Zed Books, pp. 46–66.
4.
BraunK (2015) I don’t take this man to be my lawfully wedded husband: Considering the criminal offense of forced marriage and its potential impact on the lives of girls and young women with migrant backgrounds in Germany. German Law Journal16(4): 845–869.
5.
BuntingALawranceBNRobertsRI (2016) Something old, something new? Conceptualising forced marriage in Africa. In: BuntingALawranceBNRobertsRI (eds) Marriage by Force? Contestation Over Consent and Coercion in Africa. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, pp. 1–42.
Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth (2022) Zwangsverheiratung bekämpfen – Betroffene wirksam schützen. Available at: https://t.ly/s035 (accessed 6 February 2025).
11.
GangoliGChantlerKHesterM, et al. (2011) Understanding forced marriage: Definitions and realities. In: GillAKAnithaS (eds) Forced Marriage: Introducing a Social Justice and Human Rights Perspective. London: Zed Books, pp. 25–45.
12.
GillAKAnithaS (2011) Introduction: Framing forced marriage as a form of violence against women. In: GillAKAnithaS (eds) Forced Marriage: Introducing a Social Justice and Human Rights Perspective. London: Zed Books, pp. 1–24.
13.
GREVIO (2020) Baseline Evaluation Report. Spain (GREVIO/Inf(2020)19). Secretariat of the monitoring mechanism of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/grevio-s-report-on-spain/1680a08a9f (accessed 6 February 2025).
14.
GREVIO (2022) Baseline Evaluation Report on Germany (GREVIO/Inf(2022)21). Secretariat of the monitoring mechanism of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/report-on-germany-for-publication/1680a86937 (accessed 6 February 2025).
HongT (2019) Kunniaan liittyvän väkivallan uhrin oikeudellinen asema. Doctoral dissertation, Turun yliopisto. Available at: https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-29-7917-2 (accessed 6 February 2025).
LeahySO’SullivanKKathrynD, et al. (2018) Changing conceptions of marriage in Ireland: Law and practice. Child and Family Law Quarterly30(3): 279–300. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10344/8503 (accessed 6 February 2025).
OlssonN (2019) Pakkoavioliiton kriminalisointi Suomessa. Helsinki Law Review13(1): 92–121.
33.
ParellaSGüellBContrerasP (2023) Los matrimonios forzados como forma de violencia de género desde un enfoque interseccional. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals133: 137–159.
Rikosuhripäivystys (RIKU) (2023) Rikosuhripäivystyksen ihmiskaupan uhrien erityistukipalvelun asiakasmäärä kasvoi voimakkaasti vuonna. Available at: https://acortar.link/HvA901(accessed 6 October 2025).
37.
RothVLuhtasaariM (2021) Suomi torjuu ihmiskauppaa. Ihmiskaupan vastainen toimintaohjelma. Helsinki: Oikeusministeriö. Available at: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-259-901-8 (accessed 6 February 2025).
38.
SchubertKMoebiusI (2006) Zwangsheirat – Mehr als nur ein Straftatbestand: Neue Wege zum Schutz der Opfer. Zeitschrift Für Rechtspolitik39(2): 33–37. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23428945 (accessed 6 February 2025).
VillacampaC (2020) Forced marriage as a lived experience: Victims’ voices. International Review of Victimology26(3): 344–367.
45.
VillacampaC (2021) Spanish criminal policy and the state pact on gender violence: A critical assessment. SN Social Sciences1: 129.
46.
VillacampaCTorresN (2020) Prevalence, dynamics and characteristics of forced marriage in Spain. Crime, Law and Social Change73: 509–529.
47.
VillacampaCTorresN (2021) Forced marriage: What do professionals know?International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice67: 1–11.
48.
ViuhkoMLietonenAJokinenA, et al. (eds) (2016) Exploitative Sham Marriages: Exploring the Links between Human Trafficking and Sham Marriages in Estonia, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia. Helsinki: HEUNI Publication Series.
49.
YerlikayaHÇakır-CeylanE (2011) Zwangs- und Scheinehen im Fokus staatlicher Kontrolle; Eine Betrachtung des jüngsten Gesetzesentwurfes zur Bekämpfung der Zwangsheirat unter Verhinderung von Scheinehen im Lichte des Opferschutzes. Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik4: 2015–2013. Available at: https://www.zis-online.com/dat/artikel/2011_4_546.pdf (accessed 6 February 2025).
