Providing ‘justice for victims’ has become a common argument for the establishment of international criminal tribunals. However, the victims’ role in trials of mass atrocities is highly disputed among scholars and practitioners. This article will take a look behind the theoretical understanding of ‘justice’ and present the views of victims, judges, prosecutors and lawyers involved in the proceedings. Based on 30 qualitative interviews that have been conducted at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia, this article attempts to examine what elements of justice an international(ized) criminal trial can and should achieve from the perspective of its participants. An insight into the victims’ and legal professionals’ expectations for justice sheds light on the question to what extent ‘justice for victims’ is a feasible interest of internation(ized) trials or a mere symbolic label to legitimize international courts. Considering the financial and practical constraints of international criminal courts, the article endeavours to identify measures both in and out of the courtroom that balance the interests of all participants.
AertsenIParmentierSVanfraechemIWalgraveLZinsstagE (2013) An adventure is taking off. Why Restorative Justice: An International Journal?Restorative Justice1: 1–30.
2.
BaumgartnerE (2008) Aspects of victim participation in the Proceedings of the International Criminal Court. International Review of the Red Cross, 90: 409–440.
3.
BittiG (2011) Les victimes devant la Cour pénale internationale, Les promesses faites à Rome ont-elles été tenues?Revue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé2: 293–341.
4.
BittiGFrimanH (2001) Participation of victims in the proceedings. In: LeeR (ed.) The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence. Ardsley, New York: Transnational Publishers, 456–474.
5.
BoraineA (2006) Transitional justice: A holistic interpretation. Journal of International Affairs60(1): 17–27.
6.
ChungC (2008) Victims’ participation at the international criminal court: Are concessions of the court clouding the promise?Northwestern Journal of Human Rights6: 459–545.
7.
DanieliY (2004) Victims: Essential voices at the court. VRWG Bulletin, Issue 1, September 2004. Available at: http://www.vrwg.org/Publications/04/ENG01.pdf (accessed 19 April 2013).
8.
de HemptinneJ (2010) Challenges raised by victims’ participation in the Proceedings of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. Journal of International Criminal Justice8: 165–179.
9.
De VausD (1996) Surveys in Social Research (3rd edn). London: UCL Press.
10.
DoakJ (2005) Victims’ rights in criminal trials: Prospects for participation. Journal of Law & Society32: 294–316.
11.
DuffA (2001) Punishment, Communication, and Community. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
DuthieR (2008) Toward a development-sensitive approach to transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice2: 292–309.
13.
ElanderM (2013) The victim’s address: Expressivism and the victim at the extraordinary chambers in the courts of Cambodia. The International Journal of Transitional Justice7: 95–115.
14.
Fernandez de GurmendiSAFrimanH (2001) The rules of procedure and evidence of the International Criminal Court. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law3:289–336.
15.
FindlayM (2009) Activating a victim constituency in international criminal justice. The International Journal of Transitional Justice3: 183–206.
16.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Aldine.
17.
HenryN (2009) Witness to rape: The limits and potential of international war crimes trials for victims of wartime sexual violence. International Journal of Transitional Justice3: 114–134.
18.
HovenEFeilerMScheibelS (2013) Victims in trials of mass crimes: A multi-perspective study of Civil Party participation at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Cologne: Institute for International Peace and Security Law.
19.
JouetM (2007) Reconciling the conflicting rights of victims and defendants at the International Criminal Court. Saint Louis Public University Law Review26: 249–307.
20.
KirchenbauerNBalthazardMKyLVinckPPhamP (2013) Victims participation before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: Baseline study of the Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association’s Civil Party Scheme for Case 002. Phnom Penh: Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC) and Harvard Humanitarian Initiative.
21.
KritzNJ (ed.) (1995) Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
22.
KrokerP (2010) Transitional justice policy in practice: Victim participation in the Khmer Rouge Tribunal. German Yearbook of International Law53: 753–791.
23.
LambourneW (2009) Transitional justice and peacebuilding after mass violence. The International Journal of Transitional Justice3: 28–48.
24.
McCarthyC (2012) Victim redress and international criminal justice. Journal of International Criminal Justice10: 351–372.
25.
McKayF (1999) Universal jurisdiction in Europe: Criminal prosecutions in Europe since 1990 for war crimes, crimes against humanity, torture & genocide. REDRESS. Available at: http://www.redress.org/documents/inpract.html (accessed 19 April 2013).
MarshC (2004) The critics of surveys. In: SealeC (ed.) Social Research Methods. London: Routledge.
28.
MayT (1997) Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process. Buckingham: Open University Press.
29.
MinowM (1998) Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston: Beacon Press.
30.
NinoC (1996) Radical Evil on Trial. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
PhamPVinckPBalthazardMHeanSStoverE (2009) So We Will Never Forget: A Population-Based Survey of Attitudes about Social Reconstruction and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Berkeley, CA: Human Rights Center.
32.
PhamPVinckPBalthazardMStrasserJOmC (2011) Victim participation and the trial of Duch at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Journal of Human Rights Practice3(3): 264–287.
33.
ReismanWM (1996) Legal responses to genocide and other massive violations of human rights. Law and Contemporary Problems59: 75–80.
34.
SalimovichSLiraEWeinsteinE (1992) Victims of fear: The social psychology of repression. In: CorradiJEFagenPWManuelAG (eds) Fear at the Edge: State Terror and Resistance. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 72–89.
35.
ScullyS (2011) Judging the successes and failures of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal13: 302–353.
StahnCOlásoloHGibsonK (2006) Participation of victims in pre-trial Proceedings of the ICC. Journal of International Criminal Justice4: 219–238.
38.
StoverEBalthazardMKoenigKA (2011) Confronting Duch: Civil party participation in Case 001 at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. International Review of the Red Cross93(882): 1–44.
39.
TeitelRG (2003) Transitional justice in a new era. Fordham International Law Journal26: 893–906.
40.
TurnerJI (2009) Decision on civil party participation in provisional detention appeals. American Journal of International Law103: 116–121.
41.
Van den WyngaertC (2011) Victims before International Criminal Courts: Some views and concerns of an ICC trial judge. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law44: 475–496.
