Following the quashing of an unsafe conviction, the appellant and their supporters often rejoice that their quest for justice has been successful and that the appellant has been released from their wrongful imprisonment. For the survivors of crime involved in the criminal case, including those suffering bereavement after homicide, the appellant’s release from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) can engender feelings of resentment and hostility. This article will examine relationships between survivors of wrongful conviction and survivors of crime often involved in the same criminal case. The article argues that the antipathy between the families contributes to undermining both parties’ desire for emotional healing and recovery.
AllisonE (2010) Joint enterprise law questioned by mother of teen convict. The Guardian, 4 August.
4.
AngleHMalamSCareyC (2003) Key Findings from the Witness Satisfaction Survey 2002, Home Office Findings 189. Home Office Online Report 19/03.
5.
AshworthA (2002) Human Rights, Serious Crime and Criminal Procedure. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
6.
AshworthA (2009) Responsibilities, rights and restorative justice. In: JohnstoneGVan NessDW (eds) Handbook of Restorative Justice. Cullompton: Willan.
7.
Australian Law Reform Commission (2000) Managing Justice: A Review of the Federal Civil Justice System. Available at: www.alrc.gov.au/report-89, accessed 4 January 2013.
8.
BanksJ (2008) Conference Lecture. Miscarriage of Justice: Limits of Reparation. Glasgow: Miscarriages of Justice Organisation, 21 April.
BennettC (2006) Satisfying the needs and interests of victims. In: JohnstoneGVan NessDW (eds) Handbook of Restorative Justice. Cullompton: Willan, 247–265.
11.
BraithwaiteJ (1999) Restorative justice: Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research25: 1–127.
12.
BurtonMEvansRSandersA (2007) Vulnerable and intimidated witnesses and the adversarial process in England and Wales. International Journal of Evidence and Proof11(1): 1–23.
DalyK (2005) A tale of two studies: Restorative justice from a victim’s perspective. In: ElliotEGordonRM (eds) New Directions in Restorative Justice: Issues, Practice, Evaluation. Cullompton: Willan.
DennisI (2002) Fair trials and safe convictions. CLP56: 211.
22.
DignanJ (2005) Understanding Victims and Restorative Justice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
23.
DunnPShephardE (2006) Oral testimony from the witness’s perspective – psychological and forensic considerations. In: Heaton-ArmstrongAShephardEGudjonssonGWochoverD (eds) Witness Testimony: Psychological Investigative and Evidential Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
EllisonL (2001) The Adversarial Process and the Vulnerable Witness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
FreedyJRDonkervoltJC (1995) Traumatic stress: An overview of the field. In: FreedyJRHobfollSE (eds) Traumatic Stress: From Theory to Practice. New York: Plenum, 3–28.
26.
FreedyJRHobfollSE (1995) Traumatic Stress: From Theory to Practice. New York: Plenum.
27.
GroundsA (2004) Psychological consequences of wrongful conviction and imprisonment. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice46: 165–182.
28.
GroundsA (2005) Understanding the effects of wrongful imprisonment. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research32: 1–58.
29.
HallNGrieveJSavageS (2009) Policing and the Legacy of Lawrence. Cullompton: Willan.
30.
Hungerford-WelchP (2009) Criminal Procedure and Sentencing (7th edn). Oxford: Routledge-Cavendish.
31.
JamiesonRGroundsA (2005) Release and adjustment: Perspectives from studies of wrongly convicted and politically motivated prisoners. In: LieblingAMarunaS (eds) The Effects of Imprisonment. Cullompton: Willan, 33–66.
32.
JardineC (2008) OJ Simpson should fear Ann Ming. The Telegraph, 25 September.
33.
JenkinsRBannermanL (2013) Sex abuse victim killed herself after court ordeal. The Times, 9February, p. 6.
MasonP (2010) Press and Release: UK News Coverage of the CCRC since 1996. In: NaughtonM (ed.) The Criminal Cases Review Commission. Hope for the Innocent?Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
MillerDPorterC (1983) Self-blame in victims of violence. Journal of Social Issues39(2): 139–152.
38.
MingA (2008) For the Love of Julie. London: Harper Element.
39.
NaughtonM (2010) The Criminal Cases Review Commission. Hope for the Innocent?Basingstoke: Palgrave.
40.
NaughtonM (2012) The Criminal Cases Review Commission: Innocence versus safety and the integrity of the criminal justice system. Criminal Law Quarterly58: 207–244.
41.
NewburnT (1993) The Long-term Needs of Victims: A Review of the Literature. London: Home Office.
42.
NoblesRSchiffD (2002a) Understanding Miscarriages of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
NoblesRSchiffD (2002b) The right to appeal and workable systems of justice. Modern Law Review65: 676.
44.
O’BrienM (2008) The Death of Justice. Talybont: Y Lolfa Cyf.
45.
ParkesCM (1993) Psychiatric problems following bereavement by murder or manslaughter. British Journal of Psychiatry162: 49–54.
46.
PatersonADunnPChastonKMaloneL (2006) In the Aftermath: The Support Needs of People Bereaved by Homicide. London: Victim Support.
47.
RandoTA (1993) Treatment of Complicated Mourning. Champaign: Research Press.
48.
RiggsDKilpatrickD (1990) Families and friends: Indirect victimisation by crime. In: LurigioASkoganWDaviesR (eds) Victims of Crime: Problems, Policies and Programs. London: SAGE, 120–138.
49.
RobertsS (2003) Unsafe convictions: Defining and compensating miscarriages of justice. Modern Law Review3: 441–451.
50.
RockP (1998) After Homicide. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
51.
RosenthalG (2003) The healing effects of storytelling: On the conditions of curative storytelling in the context of research and counselling. Qualitative Inquiry9(6): 895–915.
52.
SandersAJonesI (2007) The victim in court. In: WalklateS (ed.) Handbook of Victims and Victimology. Cullompton: Willan, 282–307.
53.
SandersAYoungRBurtonM (2010) Criminal Justice (4th edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
SavageS (2007) Restoring justice: Campaigns against miscarriages of justice and the restorative justice process. European Journal of Criminology4(2): 195–216.
55.
SchiffM (2006) Satisfying the needs and interests of stakeholders. In: JohnstoneGVan NessDW (eds) Handbook of Restorative Justice. Cullompton: Willan, 228–247.
56.
ShaplandJWillmoreJDuffP (1985) Victims in the Criminal Justice System. Aldershot: Gower.
57.
SimonRI (1993) The psychological and legal aftermath of false arrest and imprisonment. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law21: 523–528.
58.
SoothillKSoothillD (1993) Prosecuting the victim? A study of the reporting of barristers’ comments in rape cases. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice32(1): 12–24.
59.
Supreme Court UK (UKSC) 18 (2011): InR (on the application of Adams) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) In the Matter of an Application by Eamonn MacDermott for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) In the Matter of an Application by Raymond Pius McCartney for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland).
VarvinSRosebaumB (2003) Extreme traumatisation: Strategies for mental survival. International Forum for Psychoanalysis12(1): 5–16.
62.
WalklateS (1993) Appreciating the victim: Conventional, realist or critical victimology? In: YoungJMatthewsR (eds) Issues in Realist Criminology. London: SAGE, 102–118.
63.
WalklateS (2004) Gender, Crime and Criminal Justice. Cullompton: Willan.
64.
WhiteheadE (2001) Witness Satisfaction: Findings from the Witness Satisfaction Survey 2000, Home Office Research Study 230. London: Home Office.
65.
WoffindenB (2010) The Criminal Cases Review Commission has failed. The Guardian, 30 November.
66.
WortmanCBBattleESLemkauJP (1997) Coming to terms with the sudden, traumatic death of a spouse or child. In: DaviesRLurigioASkoganW (eds) Victims of Crime. London: SAGE, 108–133.
67.
ZednerL (2002) Victims. In: MaguireMMorganRReinerR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
