The London Borough of Croydon, in the south of England, established, in December 2005, a Family Justice Centre (FJC) to respond in a flexible way to meet the varied needs of those abused in intimate relationships. The FJC brings together some 33 agencies under one roof. This article draws on a small, grounded pilot study of the Croydon FJC – the first study of a FJC in the UK − to consider if the co-location and cooperation of services to victims of domestic abuse has the potential to empower victims to make informed choices about their futures.
BlissMCookSKaslowNJ (2007) An ecological approach to understanding incarcerated women’s responses to abuse. Women and Therapy29(3−4): 97–115.
2.
BlissMOgley-OliverEJacksonEHarpSKaslowNJ (2008) African American women’s readiness to change abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence23: 161–171.
3.
BrownJ (1997) Working toward freedom from violence: The process of change in battered women. Violence Against Women3(1): 3–26.
4.
DobashREDobashRP (1980) Violence Against Wives. Somerset: Open Books.
5.
DobashRPDobashRE (2004) Women’s violence to men in intimate relationshipsBritish Journal of Criminology44(3): 324–349.
6.
GarnerJHMaxwellCD (2008) Coordinated community responses to intimate partner violence in the 20th and 21st centuries. Criminology & Public Policy7(4): 525–535.
7.
GiacomazziAHannahEBostaphL (2008) Nampa Family Justice Center Process and Outcome Evaluation Report. Nampa, ID: Nampa Family Justice Center.
8.
GwinnCStrackG (2006) Hope for Hurting Families: Creating Family Justice Centers Across America. Volcano, CA: Volcano Press.
9.
GwinnCStrackGAdamsSLovelaceRNormanD (2007) The Family Justice Center Collaborative Model. Saint Louis University Public Law Review27: 79–120.
10.
HambergerLKGuseCE (2002) Men's and women’s use of intimate partner violence in clinical samples. Violence Against Women8(11): 1301–1331.
11.
HanmerJ (1989) Women and policing in Britain. In: HanmerJRadfordJStankoEA (eds) Women, Policing and Male Violence: International Perspectives. London: Routledge.
12.
HesterMHanmerJCoulsonSMorahanMRazakA (2003) Domestic Violence Making it Through the Criminal Justice System. International Centre for the Study of Violence and Abuse, University of Sunderland and the Northern Rock Foundation.
13.
HMIC and HMCPSI (2004) Violence at Home: Joint Thematic Review of the Investigation and Prosecution of Cases Involving Domestic Violence. UK Government: HMIC and HMCPSI.
14.
Holtzworth-MunroeAMeehanJCHerronKStuartGL (1999) A typology of male batterers: An initial examination. In: ArriagaXBOskampS (eds) Violence in Intimate Relationships. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 45–72.
15.
HortonAJohnsonB (1993) Profile and strategies of women who have ended abuse: Families in society. The Journal of Contemporary Human Services74: 481–492.
16.
HoyleC (1998) Negotiating Domestic Violence: Police, Criminal Justice and Victims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
HoyleC (2007) Feminism, victimology and domestic violence. In: WalklateS (ed.) Handbook of the Victims and Victimology. Cullompton: Willan.
18.
HoyleC (2008) Will she be safe? A critical analysis of risk assessment in domestic violence cases. Children and Youth Services Review30(3): 323–337.
19.
HoyleCSandersA (2000) Police response to domestic violence: From victim choice to victim empowerment?British Journal of Criminology40: 14–36.
20.
HumphreysCThiaraT (2002) Routes to Safety: Protection Issues Facing Abused Women and Children and the Role of Outreach Services. Bristol: Women’s Aid Federation England.
21.
JohnsonMP (2000) Conflict and control: Images of symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. In: BoothACClementsM (eds) Couples in Conflict. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
JohnsonMP (2008) A Typology of Domestic Violence: Intimate Terrorism, Violent Resistance, and Situational Couple Violence. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
LamingLord (2009) The Protection of Children in England: A Progress Report. London: The Stationery Office, HC 330.
25.
LavilleS (2012) Domestic conviction rates at an all-time high. The Guardian, 22 July.
26.
LeoneJMJohnsonMCohanCL (2007) Victim help seeking: Differences between intimate terrorism and situational couple violence. Family Relations56: 427–439.
27.
LiangBGoodmanLTummala-NarraPWeintraubS (2005) A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology36(1−2): 71–84.
28.
MacCormickNGarlandD (1998) Sovereign states and vengeful victims: The problem of the right to punish. In: AshworthAWasikM (eds) Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
McDermottMJGarofaloJ (2004) When advocacy for domestic violence victims backfires: Types and sources of victim disempowerment. Violence Against Women10: 1245–1266.
30.
NewmarkLHarrellASalemP (1995) Domestic violence and empowerment in custody and visitation cases. Family and Conciliation Courts Review33: 30–62.
31.
Office for National Statistics (2013) Focus on: Violent Crime and Sexual Offences 2011/12. London: ONS Statistical Bulletin.
32.
PeledELEisikovitsZEnoshGWinstockZ (2000) Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay: Toward a constructivist model. Social Work45: 9–25.
33.
Powell-WilliamsMWhiteSDPowell-WilliamsT (2013) “I help the ones that want help”: Emotion work and the victim advocate role. Sociological Spectrum33: 258–275.
34.
ProchaskaKODiClementeCC (1982) Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy Research and Practice20: 161–173.
35.
RobinsonACookD (2006) Understanding victim retraction in cases of domestic violence: Specialist courts, government policy, and victim-centred justice. Contemporary Justice Review9: 189–213.
SaundersD (2002) Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem? A review of the literature. Violence Against Women8(12): 1424–1448.
38.
ShepardMF (1999) Advocacy for battered women: Implications for a coordinated community response. In: ShepherdMFPenceEL (eds) Coordinating Community Responses to Domestic Violence: Lessons from Duluth and Beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 115–125.
39.
SmithKColemanKEderSHallP (2011) Homicides, Firearm Offences and Intimate Violence 2009/10. Statistical Bulletin 01/11. London: Home Office.
40.
StankoEA (1997) Should I stay or should I go? Some thoughts on the variants of intimate violence. Violence Against Women3(6): 629–635.
41.
TownsendMHuntDRhodesW (2005) Evaluability Assessment of the President’s Family Justice Center Initiative. Unpublished report, Washington: US Department of Justice.
42.
WeiszANTolmanMSaundersDG (2000) Assessing the risk of severe domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence15: 75–90.
