This article examines how correctional systems absorb feminist-inspired reformist discourses that focus upon women's victimization as a ‘pathway’ to incarceration. Through the absorption process the concept of gender loses its socio-economic and political resonance, centering instead the psychological effects of gender oppression. A psychological notion of gender has been used to individualize and pathologize criminalized women through prison programming and is linked with notions of ‘risk’ to re-offend. I reflect upon the role of evidence-based practice (EBP) in exacerbating epistemic problems related to the subjectivity of the ‘risky victim.’ Moving beyond this conceptualization, I suggest the importance of an analysis which draws connections across spaces of confinement and challenges the very role and practices of prisons as examples of racialized and gendered violence themselves.
AdamsSLeukefeldCPedenA (2008) Substance abuse treatment for women offenders: A research review. Journal of Addictions Nursing19: 61–75.
2.
AllspachA (2010) Landscapes of (neo-)liberal control: The transcarceral spaces of federally sentenced women in Canada. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography17(6): 705–723.
3.
ArnoldR (1990) The processes of victimization and criminalization of black women. Social Justice17(3): 153–166.
4.
BiestaG (2010) Why ‘what works’ still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education29(5): 491–503.
5.
BirgenAPerlinM (2009) Where the home in the valley meets the damp dirty prison: A human rights perspective on therapeutic jurisprudence and the role of forensic psychologists in correctional settings. Aggression and Violent Behavior14: 256–263.
6.
BlanchetteKTaylorK (2009) Reintegration of female offenders: Perspectives on ‘what works’. Corrections Today71: 60–64.
7.
BloomBOwenBCovingtonS (2004) Women offenders and the gendered effects of public policy. Review of Policy Research21(1): 31–48.
8.
BontaJWormithS (2007) Risk and need assessment. In: McIvorPRaynorG (eds) Developments in Social Work with Offenders. London: Jessica Kingsley, pp. 131–152.
9.
BrownM (2009) The Culture of Punishment: Prison, Society and Spectacle. New York: University Press.
10.
BrownMBloomB (2008) Colonialism and carceral motherhood: Native Hawaiian families under corrections and child welfare control. Feminist Criminology4(2): 151–169.
11.
ButlerAFordDTregaskisC (2007) Who do we think we are? Self and reflexivity in social work practice. Qualitative Social Work6(3): 281–299.
12.
CarlenP (1988) Women, Crime and Poverty. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
CollinsPH (1990) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
15.
ComackE (1996) Women in Trouble. Halifax: Fernwood Press.
16.
ComackE (2006) The feminist engagement with criminology. In: BalfourGComackE (eds) Criminalizing Women. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Publishing.
17.
Correctional Service of Canada (2009) Response from the Correctional Service of Canada Response to the 36th Annual Report of the Correctional Investigator. Available at: http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/pblct/ci08-09/index-eng.shtml. Accessed 4 July 2009.
18.
CrenshawK (1991) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review43: 1241–1299.
19.
CunneenC (2009) Indigenous incarceration: The violence of colonial law and justice. In: ScratonPMcCullochJ (eds) The Violence of Incarceration. London: Routledge, pp. 209–224.
20.
DalyK (1992) Women’s pathways to felony court: Feminist theories of lawbreaking and problems of representation. Review of Law and Women’s Studies2: 11–52.
21.
DalyKStephensD (1995) The ‘dark figure’ of criminology: Towards a black and multi-ethnic feminist agenda for theory and research. In: RafterNHHeidensonF (eds) International Feminist Perspectives in Criminology. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 189–215.
22.
DavidsonJChesney-LindM (2009) Discounting women: Context matters in risk and need assessment. Critical Criminology12: 221–245.
23.
DavisA (2003) Are Prisons Obsolete?New York: Seven Stories Press.
24.
DavisS (2011) Inside out: The reaches and limits of a prison education program. In: LawstonJMLucasAE (eds) Razoer Wire Women: Prisoners, Activists, Scholars, and Artists. New York: SUNY Press, pp. 203–223.
25.
DenzinN (2009) The elephant in the living room: Or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qualitative Research9(2): 139–160.
26.
DowdenCAndrewsDA (1999) What works for female offenders: A meta-analytic review. Crime & Delinquency45: 438–452.
27.
FaithK (1993) Unruly Women: The Politics of Confinement and Resistance. Vancouver: Press Gang Publishers.
28.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.
29.
FoucaultM (2003) Society Must be Defended. Lectures at the College de France, 1975−1976. New York: Picador.
30.
FoxK (2001) Self-change and resistance in prison. In: GubriumJFHolsteinJA (eds) Institutional Selves: Troubled Identities in a Postmodern World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 176–192.
31.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
GilfusM (1992) From victims to survivors to offenders: Women’s routes of entry and immersion into street crime. Women and Criminal Justice4(1): 63–89.
33.
GilmoreRW (2007) Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
GordonA (2009) The United States military prison: The normalcy of exceptional brutality. In: ScratonPMcCullochJ (eds) The Violence of Incarceration. London: Routledge, pp. 164–186.
35.
HaneyL (2004) Introduction: Gender, welfare and states of punishment. Social Politics11(3): 333–362.
36.
Hannah-MoffatK (2004) Losing ground: Gendered knowledges, parole risk, and responsibility. Social Politics11(3): 363–385.
37.
Hannah-MoffatK (2010) Sacrosanct or flawed: Risk, accountability and gender-responsive penal politics. Current Issues in Criminal Justice22(2): 1–25.
38.
HaymanS (2006) Imprisoning Our Sisters: The New Federal Women’s Prisons in Canada. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
39.
HolmesDMurraySPerronARailG (2006) Deconstructing the evidence-based discourse in health sciences: Truth, power and fascism. International Journal of Evidence Based Health Care4: 180–186.
40.
HopeT (2004) Pretend it works: Evidence and governance in the evaluation of the Reducing Burglary Initiative. Criminal Justice4(3): 287–308.
41.
KendallK (2002) Time to think again about cognitive behavioral programs. In: CarlenP (ed.) Women and Punishment: The Struggle for Justice. Portland: Willan Publishing, pp. 182–198.
42.
MaloneyKPMollerLF (2009) Good practice for mental health programming for women in prison: Reframing the parameters. Public Health123: 431–433.
43.
McCullochJGeorgeA (2009) Naked power: Strip searching in women’s prisons. In: ScratonPMcCullochJ (eds) The Violence of Incarceration. London: Routledge, pp. 107–123.
44.
McCullochJPickeringS (2009) The violence of refugee incarceration. In: ScratonPMcCullochJ (eds) The Violence of Incarceration. London: Routledge, pp. 225–243.
45.
McCullochJScratonP (2009) The violence of incarceration: An introduction. In: ScratonPMcCullochJ (eds) The Violence of Incarceration. London: Routledge, pp. 1−18.
46.
MartinsonR (1974) What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest35: 22–54.
47.
MooreLScratonP (2009) The imprisonment of women and girls in the North of Ireland: A ‘continuum of violence’. In: ScratonPMcCullochJ (eds) The Violence of Incarceration. London: Routledge, pp. 124–144.
48.
NeveLPateK (2005) Challenging the criminalization of women who resist. In: SudburyJ (ed.) Global Lockdown: Race, Gender, and the Prison-Industrial Complex. London: Routledge, pp. 19–34.
49.
OwenB (1998) ‘In the Mix’: Struggle and Survival in a Women’s Prison. Albany: State University of New York Press.
PollackS (2007) ‘I’m just not good in relationships’: Victimization discourses and the gendered regulation of criminalized women. Feminist Criminology2(2): 158–174.
52.
PollackS (2009) ‘You can't have it both ways’: Punishment and treatment of imprisoned women. Journal of Progressive Human Services20(2): 112–128.
53.
PollackS (2010) Labeling clients risky: Social work and the neo-liberal welfare state. British Journal of Social Work40(4): 1263–1278.
54.
RazackS (1998) Looking White People in the Eye: Gender, Race and Culture in Courtrooms and Classrooms. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
55.
RettingerLJAndrewsDA (2010) General risk and need, gender specificity, and the recidivism of female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behaviour37(1): 29–46.
56.
RichieB (1996) Compelled to Crime: The Gender Entrapment of Battered Black Women. New York: Routledge.
57.
RodriquezD (2009) A reign of terror: United States global statecraft and the technology of punishment and capture. In: ScratonPMcCullochJ (eds) The Violence of Incarceration. London: Routledge, pp. 187–208.
58.
RoseN (2000) Government and control. British Journal of Criminology40(2): 321–339.
59.
SackettDLRosenbergWMGrayJAHaynesRBRichardsonWS (1996) Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal312: 71–72.
ShaylorC (2009) Neither kind nor gentle: The perils of ‘gender responsive justice’. In: ScratonPMcCullochJ (eds) The Violence of Incarceration. London: Routledge, pp. 145–163.
65.
SheehanRMcIvorGTrotterC (2007) What Works with Women Offenders. Oxfordshire: Willan.
66.
SpivakGC (1988) Can the subaltern speak? In: NelsonCGrossbergL (eds) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 271–316.
67.
SpivakGC (2005) Scattered speculations on the subaltern and the popular. Postcolonial Studies8(4): 475–486.
68.
SudburyJ (2005) Introduction: Feminist critiques, transnational landscapes, abolitionist visions. In: SudburyJ (ed.) Global Lockdown: Race, Gender, and the Prison-Industrial Complex. New York: Routledge, pp. xi−xxviii.
69.
TaylorKBlanchetteK (2009) The women are not wrong: It is the approach that is debatable. Criminology and Public Policy8(1): 221–229.
70.
TurnbullSHannah-MoffatK (2009) Under these conditions: Gender, parole and the governance of reintegration. British Journal of Criminology49: 532–551.
71.
WallS (2008) A critique of evidence-based practice in nursing: Challenging the assumptions. Social Theory and Health6: 37–53.
72.
WebbS (2001) Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work. British Journal of Social Work31: 57–79.
