Stalking is a complex social phenomenon which can take on many different forms. In this article, efforts are made to reduce the multiplicity of heterogeneous patterns of stalking victimization to a small number of distinct victimization profiles. Based on a survey of Austrian stalking victims, a typology of stalking profiles is developed that reflects the different phenotypes of stalking victimization in terms of the behavioural components of the incidents. A latent class analysis identifies four types of stalking victimization that differ significantly in their determinants and their impact on the victim’s well-being and quality of life.
BortzJDöringN (1995) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation. Berlin: Springer.
4.
BuddTMattinsonJ (2000) The Extent and Nature of Stalking: Findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey. London: Home Office.
5.
CupachWSpitzbergB (2004) The Dark Side of Relationship Pursuit: From Attraction to Obsession and Stalking. Mahwah: LEA.
6.
De FazioL (2009) The legal situation on stalking among the European member states. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research15: 229–242.
7.
DressingHKuehnerCGassP (2006) Stalking in Deutschland. In: HoffmannJVoßHG (eds) Psychologie des Stalking. Grundlagen – Forschung – Anwendung. Frankfurt: Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft, 27–43.
8.
HagenaarsJMcCutcheonA (2002) Applied Latent Class Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
HoffmannJ (2006) Stalking. Heidelberg: Springer.
10.
JohnsonMKercherG (2009) Identifying predictors of negative psychological reactions to stalking victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence5: 866–882.
11.
LoYMendellNRubinD (2001) Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika88: 767–778.
12.
LöhrG (2008) Zur Notwendigkeit eines Spezifischen Anti-Stalking-Straftatbestandes in Deutschland. Eine Rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung unter Besonderer Berücksichtigung der Australischen Rechtsentwicklung. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.
13.
McCutcheonA (1987) Latent Class Analysis. London: SAGE.
14.
McLachlanGPeelD (2000) Finite Mixture Models. New York: Wiley.
15.
MagidsonJVermuntJ (2004) Latent class models. In: KaplanD (ed.) The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences. London: SAGE, 175–198.
16.
MeloyJ (1996) Stalking (obsessional following): A review of some preliminary studies. Aggression and Violent Behavior2: 147–162.
17.
MitgutschI (2009) Aspects of ‘stalking’ in Austrian criminal law. In: BacherJGorniakJNiezgodaM (eds) Selected Research Papers in Education, Labour Market and Criminology, Volume 1. Linz: Trauner, 110–122.
18.
MohandieKMeloyJGreen-McGowanMWilliamsJ (2006) The RECON typology of stalking: Reliability and validity based upon a large sample of North American stalkers. Journal of Forensic Sciences51: 147–155.
19.
MullenPPathéMPurcellR (2000) Stalkers and Their Victims. Cambridge: University Press.
20.
MullenPPathéMPurcellRStewartG (1999) Study of stalkers. American Journal of Psychiatry156: 1244–1249.
21.
MuthénLMuthénB (1998–2007) Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles: Muthén and Muthén.
22.
OrmeJCombs-OrmeT (2009) Multiple Regression with Discrete Dependent Variables. Oxford: University Press.
23.
PathéMMullenP (1997) The impact of stalkers on their victims. British Journal of Psychiatry170: 12–17.
24.
SchwartzG (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics6: 461–464.
25.
ScloveL (1987) Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika52: 333–343.
26.
SheridanLBlaauwE (2006) Stalkertypologien und Interventionsstrategien. In: HoffmannJVoßH (eds) Psychologie des Stalking. Grundlagen – Forschung – Anwendung. Frankfurt: Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft, 73–91.
27.
SheridanLBoonJ (2002) Stalker typologies: Implications for law enforcement. In: BoonJSheridanL (eds) Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession. Chichester: Wiley, 63–82.
28.
SpitzbergB (2002) The tactical topography of stalking victimization and management. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse3: 261–288.
29.
SpitzbergBCupachW (2003) What mad pursuit? Obsessive relational intrusion and stalking related phenomena. Aggression and Violent Behavior8: 345–375.
30.
SpitzbergBCupachW (2007) The state of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior12: 64–86.
31.
TjadenP (2009) Stalking policies and research in the United States: A twenty year retrospective. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research15: 261–278.
32.
TjadenPThoennesN (1998) Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington: National Institute of Justice.
33.
TurnerJThayerJ (2001) Introduction to Analysis of Variance: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. London: SAGE.
34.
VoßHHoffmannJWondrakI (2006) Stalking in Deutschland. Aus Sicht der Betroffenen und Verfolger. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
35.
WondrakIMeinhardtBHoffmannJVoßH (2006) Opfer von Stalking – Ergebnisse der Darmstädter Stalkingstudie. In: HoffmannJVoßH (eds) Psychologie des Stalking. Grundlagen – Forschung – Anwendung. Frankfurt: Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft, 45–72.
36.
ZonaMSharmaKLaneJ (1993) A comparative study of erotomanic and obsessional subjects in a forensic sample. Journal of Forensic Sciences38: 884–903.
