This article investigated the effect of self-control on the link between individuals’ prior and future victimization, using panel data across nine years from the Pittsburgh Youth Study. Results showed that for victims with high self-control, prior theft victimization was related to decreased risk of later theft victimization. However, self-control was not related to repeat violent victimization. Control variables related to opportunity structures and delinquent subcultures played a key role in influencing the effect of self-control on the relationship between prior and later victimization. Implications of the findings are discussed.
AndersonE (1994) The code of the streets. Atlantic Monthly273: 80–94.
2.
AndersonTWHsiaoC (1982) Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. Journal of Econometrics18: 47–82.
3.
ArcherJSouthallN (2009) Does cost-benefit analysis or self-control predict involvement in bullying behavior by male prisoners?Aggressive Behavior35: 31–40.
4.
ArellanoMBondS (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies58: 277–297.
5.
AverdijkM (2010) Individuals’ victimization patterns over time. Doctoral dissertation, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
6.
AverdijkM (2011) Reciprocal effects between victimization and routine activities. Journal of Quantitative Criminology27: 125–149.
7.
BergMT (2009) Understanding the persistence of the victimization-offending relationship: Modeling causal mechanisms across place and time. Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri at St Louis, St Louis, MO.
8.
BjerkD (2009) How much can we trust causal interpretations of fixed-effects estimators in the context of criminality?Journal of Quantitative Criminology25: 391–417.
9.
BondS (2002) Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. CEMMAP Working paper CWP09/02. Institute for Fiscal Studies, UCL, London.
10.
BushwaySBrameRPaternosterR (1999) Assessing stability and change in criminal offending: A comparison of random effects, semiparametric, and fixed effects modeling strategies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology15: 23–61.
11.
CantorD (1989) Substantive implications of longitudinal design features: The National Crime Survey as a case study. In: KasprzykDDuncanGJKaltonGSinghMP (eds) Panel Surveys. New York: Wiley, pp. 25–51.
12.
CohenLEFelsonM (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review44: 588–608.
13.
DuganL (1999) The effect of criminal victimization on a household's moving decision. Criminology37: 903–930.
14.
DuganLApelR (2005) The differential risk of retaliation by relational distance: A more general model of violent victimization. Criminology43: 697–730.
15.
EvansTDCullenFTBurtonVSJrDunawayRG (1997) The social consequences of self-control: Testing the general theory of crime. Criminology35: 475–504.
16.
FarrellGPeaseK (1993) Once bitten, twice bitten: Repeat victimisation and its implications for crime prevention. London: Home Office Police Research Group.
17.
FarrellGPhillipsCPeaseK (1995) Like taking candy. Why does repeat victimization occur?British Journal of Criminology35: 384–399.
18.
FelsonRBBurchfieldKB (2004) Alcohol and the risk of physical and sexual assault victimization. Criminology42: 837–859.
19.
FinkelEJCampbellWK (2001) Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81: 263–277.
20.
FisherBSSloanJJCullenFTLuC (1998) Crime in the ivory tower: The level and sources of student victimization. Criminology36: 671–710.
21.
FordeDRKennedyLW (1997) Risky lifestyles, routine activities, and the general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly14: 265–294.
22.
GottfredsonMRHirschiT (1990) A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
GrasmickHGTittleCRBursikRJJrArneklevBK (1993) Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30: 5–29.
24.
HalabyCN (2004) Panel models in sociological research: Theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology30: 507–544.
25.
HindelangMJGottfredsonMRGarofaloJ (1978) Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
26.
HollingsheadAB (1975) Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
LasleyJR (1989) Drinking routines/lifestyles and predatory victimization: A causal analysis. Justice Quarterly6: 529–542.
31.
LauritsenJL (1998) The age-crime debate: Assessing the limits of longitudinal self-report data. Social Forces77: 127–155.
32.
LauritsenJLDavis QuinetKF (1995) Repeat victimization among adolescents and young adults. Journal of Quantitative Criminology11: 143–166.
33.
LauritsenJLSampsonRJLaubJH (1991) The link between offending and victimization among adolescents. Criminology29: 265–292.
34.
LoeberRDeLamatreMTitaGCohenJStouthamer-LoeberMFarringtonDP (1999) Gun injury and mortality: The delinquent backgrounds of juvenile victims. Violence and Victims14: 339–352.
35.
LoeberRFarringtonDPStouthamer-LoeberMWhiteHR (2008) Violence and Serious Theft. Development and Prediction from Childhood to Adulthood. New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
LynamDMoffittTStouthamer-LoeberM (1993) Explaining the relation between IQ and delinquency: Class, race, test motivation, school failure, or self-control?Journal of Abnormal Psychology102: 187–196.
37.
MarcusB (2004) Self-control in the general theory of crime: Theoretical implications of a measurement problem. Theoretical Criminology8: 33–55.
38.
NewsomeSDayALCatanoVM (2000) Assessing the predictive validity of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences29: 1005–1016.
39.
NofzigerS (2009) Victimization and the general theory of crime. Violence and Victims24: 337–350.
40.
OuelletteJAWoodW (1998) Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin124: 54–74.
41.
OuseyGCWilcoxPBrummelS (2008) Déjà vu all over again: Investigating temporal continuity of adolescent victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology24: 307–335.
42.
PaternosterRBrameRMazerollePPiqueroA (1998) Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology36: 859–866.
43.
PetersonDTaylorTJEsbensenF-A (2004) Gang membership and violent victimization. Justice Quarterly4: 793–815.
44.
PiqueroARMacDonaldJDobrinADaigleLECullenFT (2005) Self-control, violent offending, and homicide victimization: Assessing the general theory of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology21: 55–71.
45.
PrattTCCullenFT (2000) The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology38: 931–964.
46.
RoodmanD (2006) How to do xtabond2: An introduction to ‘difference’ and ‘system’ GMM in Stata. Working paper 103, Center for Global Development, Washington, DC.
47.
RountreePLandKMietheT (1994) Macro-micro integration in the study of victimization: A hierarchical logistic model analysis across Seattle neighborhoods. Criminology32: 387–414.
48.
SchreckCJ (1999) Criminal victimization and low self-control: An extension and test of a general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly16: 633–654.
49.
SchreckCJWrightRAMillerJM (2002) A study of individual and situational antecedents of violence victimization. Justice Quarterly19: 159–180.
50.
SchreckCJFisherBSMillerJM (2004) The social context of violent victimization: A study of the delinquent peer effect. Justice Quarterly21: 23–47.
51.
SchreckCJStewartEAFisherBS (2006) Self-control, victimization, and their influence on risky lifestyles: A longitudinal analysis using panel data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology22: 319–340.
52.
SchwartzDDodgeKACoieJD (1993) The emergence of chronic peer victimization in boys' play groups. Child Development64: 1755–1772.
53.
StewartEAElifsonKWSterkCE (2004) Integrating the general theory of crime into an explanation of violent victimization among female offenders. Justice Quarterly21: 160–181.
54.
TarkJKleckG (2004) Resisting crime: The effects of victim action on the outcomes of crimes. Criminology42: 861–906.
55.
TseloniAPeaseK (2004) Repeat personal victimization. Random effects, event dependence and unexplained heterogeneity. British Journal of Criminology44: 931–945.
56.
Van DijkT (2005) Victimization in the neighborhood. A sociological explanation for differences in criminal victimization across local communities. Master’s thesis, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht.
57.
Van WilsemJA (2003) Crime and context. The impact of individual, neighborhood, city and country characteristics on victimization. Doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen.
58.
WhiteJLMoffittTECaspiABartuschDJNeedlesDJStouthamer-LoeberM (1994) Measuring impulsivity and examining its relationship to delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Psychology103: 192–205.
59.
WikströmP-OHLoeberR (2000) Do disadvantaged neighborhoods cause well-adjusted children to become adolescent delinquents? A study of male juvenile serious offending, individual risk and protective factors, and neighborhood context. Criminology38: 1109–1141.
60.
WindmeijerF (2005) A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics126: 25–51.
61.
WinkelFW (2007) Post traumatic anger. Missing link in the wheel of misfortune. Available at: www.tilburg.edu/intervict(accessed 12 December 2009).
62.
WittebroodKNieuwbeertaP (1999) Wages of sin? The link between offending, lifestyle and violent victimisation. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research7: 63–80.
63.
WittebroodKNieuwbeertaP (2000) Criminal victimization during one's life course: The effects of previous victimization and patterns of routine activities. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency37: 91–122.
