Compensatory damages awarded in court are intended to make victims ‘whole again’. This intention raises the question how the losses, especially the emotional losses, that victims incur could be compensated. This paper provides an overview of the economic theories that are used to provide an answer to this question and it purports to provide a new perspective on compensation by explaining how victims could be compensated by both financial and non-financial forms of compensation.
ArlenJ. (2000). Tort Damages. In Encyclopaedia of Law and Economics. Vol. II. (BouckaertB.De GeestG., eds) pp. 682–734. Edward Elgar; Cheltenham.
2.
ArrowK. (1971). Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Markham Publishing Co; Chicago.
3.
AvrahamR. (2003). Pain-and-Suffering Damages in Tort Law: Revisiting the Theoretical Framework and the Empirical Data. Michigan Law and Economics Research Paper No. 03-001; Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper No. 03-03.
4.
AvrahamR. (2005). Should Pain-and-Suffering Damages be Abolished from Tort Law? More Experimental Evidence. University of Toronto Law Journal, 55, 941–979.
5.
AvrahamR. (2006). Putting a Price on Pain-and-Suffering Damages: A Critique of the Current Approaches and a Preliminary Proposal for Change. Northwestern University Law Review, 100, 81–120.
CalfeeJ.E.RubinP.H. (1992). Some Implications of Damage Payments for Nonpecuniary Losses. Journal of Legal Studies, 21, 371–412.
9.
CalfeeJ.E.WinstonC. (1993). The Consumer Welfare Effects of Liability for Pain and Suffering: An Exploratory Analysis. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics, 1993 (1), 133–196.
10.
CobleyC. (1998). Financial Compensation for Victims of Child Abuse. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 20 (3), 221–235.
11.
CookP.J.GrahamD.A. (1977). The Demand for Insurance and Protection: The Case of Irreplaceable Commodities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91 (1), 143–156.
12.
CooterR. (1989). Towards a Market in Unmatured Tort Claims. Virginia Law Review, 75, 388–91.
13.
CroleyS.P.HansonJ.D. (1995). The Nonpecuniary Costs of Accidents: Pain-and-Suffering Damages in Tort Law. Harvard Law Review, 108 (8), 1785–1917.
14.
DiamondP.A.HausmanJ.A. (1994). Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better Than No Number?The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (4), 45–64.
15.
FrechH.E. (1994). State-dependent Utility and the Tort System as Insurance: Strict Liability Versus Negligence. International Review of Law and Economics, 14, 261–71.
16.
FriedmanD. (1982). What is ‘Fair Compensation’ for Death or Injury?International Review of Law and Economics, 2, 81–93.
17.
FreyB.S.BenzM.StutzerA. (2004). Introducing Procedural Utility: Not Only What, But Also How Matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160 (3), 377–401.
GeistfeldM. (1995). Placing a Price on Pain and Suffering: A Method for Helping Juries Determine Tort Damages for Nonmonetary Injuries. California Law Review, 83, 773–852.
20.
HammittJ.K.GrahamJ.D. (1999). Willingness to Pay for Health Protection: Inadequate Sensitivity to Probability?Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8, 33–62.
21.
HuverR.M.E.van WeesK.A.P.C.AkermansA.J.ElbersN.A. (2007). Slachtoffers en Aansprakelijkheid. Een Onderzoek Naar Behoeften, Verwachtingen en Ervaringen Van Slachtoffers en Hun Naasten met Betrekking Tot Het Civiele Aansprakelijkheidsrecht. Deell, Terreinverkenning. WODS; Den Haag.
22.
JaffeL.L. (1953). Damages for Personal Injury: The Impact of Insurance. Law & Contemporary Problems, 18, 219–39.
23.
KaplowL.ShavellS. (2002). Economic Analysis of Law. In Handbook of Public Economics. Volume 3 (AuerbachA.J.FeldsteinM., eds) pp. 1661–1784. Elsevier; The Netherlands.
24.
KingJ.H. (2004). Pain and Suffering, Noneconomic Damages, and the Goals of Tort Law. S.M.U. L. Rev., 57, 163–210.
25.
MacCounRJ. (2005). Voice, Control, and Belonging: The Double-Edged Sword of Procedural Fairness. The Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 171–201.
26.
PryorE.S. (1993). The Tort Law Debate, Efficiency and the Kingdom of the 111: A Critique of the Insurance Theory of Compensation. Virginia Law Review, 91, 91–152.
27.
RelisT. (2006). Civil Litigation from Litigants' Perspectives: What We Know and What We Don't Know About the Litigation Experience of Individual Litigants. Studies in Law, Politics and Society, 25, 151–212.
28.
RelisT. (2007). ‘It's Not About the Money!’: A Theory on Misconceptions of Plaintiffs' Litigation Aims. Pittsburgh Law Review, 68 (2), 1–48.
SchierenG.A. (1998). The Economic Framework of Personal Injury/Wrongful Death Damages. Journal of Forensic Economics, 11 (1), 33–46.
31.
SchwawrtzA. (1988). Proposals for Product Liability Reform: A Theoretical Syntheses. The Yale Law Journal, 97 (3), 353–419.
32.
SenA.K. (1995). Rationality and Social Choice. American Economic Review, 85 (1), 1–24.
33.
SenA.K. (1997). Maximization and the Act of Choice. Econometrica, 65 (4), 745–779.
34.
ShaplandJ.WillmoreJ.DuffP. (1985). Victims in the Criminal Justice System. Go wer; Hants.
35.
ShavellS. (2003). Economic Analysis of Incident Law. NBER Working Paper Nr. 9482;
www.nber.org/papers/w9483
. This paper contains the chapters on accident law from Shavell's book: Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Harvard University Press: [AUTHOR: location please]
36.
ShumanD.W. (1994). The Psychology of Compensation in Court Law. Kansas Law Review, 43, 39–78.
37.
SunsteinC.R. (2007). Illusory Losses. U. of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 340. Available at SSRN:
http://ssm.com/abstract=983810
.
38.
TylerT.R. (2006). Process Utility and Help Seeking: What Do People Want from Experts?Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 360–376.
39.
ViscusiW.K. (1993). Comments and Discussion on the Study of Calfee & Winston: The Consumer Welfare Effects of Liability for Pain and Suffering: An Exploratory Analysis. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics, 1, 175–196.
40.
ViscusiW.K. (1996). Pain and Suffering: Damages in Search of a Sounder Rationale, Michigan Law & Policy Review, 1, 141–167.
41.
ViscusiW.K. (2000a). Misuses and Proper Uses of Hedonic Values of Life. Journal of Forensic Economics, 13, 111–125.
42.
ViscusiW.K. (2000b). The Value of Life in Legal Context. American Law and Economics Review, 2(1), 195–222.
43.
ViscusiW.K. (2003). Tort Reform and Insurance Markets. Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 440. Available at SSRN:
http://ssm.com/abstact=469904
.
44.
ViscusiW.K. (2005). Value of Life. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Second Edition. (DurlaufS. N.BlumeL. E., eds). Palgrave Macmillan; London. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online. Palgrave Macmillan. 06 August 2009.
http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008V000005
>doi:10.1057/9780230226203.1784
45.
ViscusiW.K. (2008). The Flawed Hedonic Damages Measure for Wrongful Death and Personal Injury Compensation. Journal of Forensic Economics, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN:
http://ssm.com/abstract=1084933
.
46.
ViscusiW.K.BornP.H. (2005). Damages Caps, Insurability, and the Performance of Medical Malpractice Insurance. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 72 (1), 23–43.
47.
ViscusiW.K.EvansW.N. (1990). Utility Functions That Depend on Health Status: Estimates and Economic Implications. American Economic Review, 80, 353–374.
