The role of science in community wellbeing has become marginalised in recent years. The reasons for this are manyfold, ranging from a rejection of the scientific method at an explicit level to a misunderstanding of how science works. This article will describe the ways in which the scientific method can contribute to the provision of victims' services, reasons why people might oppose the application of the scientific method, and ways to differentiate legitimate clinical science from pseudoscientific thought and practice.
AhnH.WampoldB.E. (2001). Where oh Where are the Specific Ingredients?: A Meta-analysis of Component Studies in Counseling and Psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 251–257.
2.
AxsomD.CooperJ. (1985). Cognitive Dissonance and Psychotherapy: The Role of Effort Justification in Inducing Weight Loss. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 149–160.
3.
BeutlerL.E.HarwoodT.M. (2001). Antiscientific Attitudes: What Happens When Scientists are Unscientific?Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 43–51.
4.
BeyersteinB.L. (2001). Fringe Psychotherapies: The Public at Risk. Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine, 5, 70–79.
5.
BorkovecT.D. (1985). Placebo: Defining the Unknown. In Placebo: Theory, Research and Mechanism (WhiteL.TurskyB.SchwartzG.E., eds) pp. 59–64. Guilford Press; New York.
6.
BorkovecT.D.BauerR. (1982). Experimental Design in Group Outcome Research. In International Handbook of Behavior Modification and Therapy (BeilackA.HersenM.KazdinA., eds) pp. 139–165. Plenum Press; New York.
7.
BorkovecT.D.CastonguayL.G. (1998). What is the Scientific Meaning of ‘Empirically Supported Therapy?’Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 136–142.
8.
BoudewynsP.A.HyerL.A. (1996). Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) as Treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 3, 185–195.
9.
BungeM. (1967). Scientific Research. Springer; New York.
10.
BungeM.A. (1973). Method, Model and Matter. Reidel; Dordrecht.
11.
BungeM. (1991). What is Science? Does it Matter to Distinguish it from Pseudoscience: A Reply to my Commentators. New Ideas in Psychology, 9, 245–283.
12.
CahillS.P.CarriganM.H.FruehB.C. (1999). Does EMDR Work? And if so, Why?: A Critical Review of Controlled Outcome and Dismantling Research. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 13, 5–33.
13.
ChamblessD.L.BakerM.J.BaucomD.H.BeutlerL.E.CalhounK.S.Crits-ChristophP.DaiutoA.DeRubeisR.DetweilerJ.HaagaD.A.F.JohnsonS.B.McCurryS.MueserK.T.PopeK.S.SandersonW.C.ShohamV.StickleT.WilliamsD.A.WoodyS.R. (1998). Update on Empirically Validated Therapies. II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3–16.
14.
CritelliJ.W.NeumannK.F. (1984). The Placebo: Conceptual Analysis of a Construct in Transition. American Psychologist, 39, 32–39.
15.
DevillyG.J. (2002). Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: A Chronology of its Development and Scientific Standing. Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 1, 113–138.
16.
DevillyG.J. (2005). The Power Therapies and Possible Threats to the Science of Psychology and Psyhiatry. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 437–445.
17.
DevillyG.J.SpenceS.H.RapeeR.M. (1998). The Clinical and Statistical Efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing: Treating PTSD within a Veteran Population. Behavior Therapy, 29, 435–455.
18.
EvansF.J. (1985). Expectancy, Therapeutic Instructions, and the Placebo Response. In Placebo: Theory, Research, and Mechanisms (WhiteL.TurskyB.SchwartzG.E., eds) pp. 215–228. Guilford Press; New York.
19.
FoaE.B.KozacM.J. (1986). Emotional Processing of Fear: Exposure to Corrective Information. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 20–35.
20.
FrankJ.D. (1961). Persuasion and Healing. Johns Hopkins University Press; Baltimore, MD.
21.
FrankJ.D. (1971). Therapeutic Factors in Psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 25, 350–361.
22.
GaffanE.A.TsaousisI.Kemp-WheelerS.M. (1995). Researcher Allegiance and Meta-analysis: The Case of Cognitive Therapy for Depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 966–980.
23.
GaudianoB.A.HerbertJ.D. (2000). Can We Really Tap Our Problems Away?Skeptical Inquirer, 24, 29–34.
24.
GilovichT. (1993). How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. The Free Press; New York.
25.
GrunbaumA. (1985). Explication and Implications of the Placebo Concept. In Placebo: Theory, Research, and Mechanisms (WhiteL.TurskyB.SchwartzG.E., eds) pp. 9–36. Guilford Press; New York.
26.
HerbertJ.D. (2000). Defining Empirically Supported Treatments: Pitfalls and Possible Solutions. The Behavior Therapist, 23, 113–122,134.
27.
HerbertJ.D.LilienfeldS.O.LohrJ.M.MontgomeryR.W.O'DonohueW.T.RosenG.M.TolinD.F. (2000). Science and Pseudoscience in the Development of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 945–971.
28.
HinesT. (2003). Pseudoscience and the Paranormal: A Critical Examination of the Evidence. Prometheus; Buffalo, NY.
29.
HuberP.W. (1991). Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom. Basic Books; New York.
30.
IllichI. (1975). Medical Nemesis: the Expropriation of Health. Calder & Boyars Ltd; London, UK.
31.
KazdinA.E. (1981). Drawing Valid Inferences from Case Studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 183–192.
32.
LakatosI. (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (LakatosI.MusgraveA., eds) pp. 91–195. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, England.
33.
LilienfeldS.O. (1998). Pseudoscience in Contemporary Clinical Psychology: What is It and What Can We Do About It?The Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3–9.
34.
LilienfeldS.O.LynnS.J.LohrJ.M. (2003). Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology. Guilford Press; New York, NY, US.
35.
LohrJ.M.DeMaioC.McGlynnF.D. (2003). Specific and Nonspecific Treatment Factors in the Experimental Analysis of Behavioural Treatment Efficacy. Behavior Modification, 27, 322–368.
36.
LuborskyL.DiguerL.SeligmanD.A.RosenthalR.KrauseE.D.JohnsonS. (1999). The Reseacher's Own Therapy Allegiances: A ‘Wild Card’ in Comparisons of Treatment Efficacy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 95–106.
37.
MahoneyM.J. (1978). Experimental Methods and Outcome Evaluation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 660–672.
38.
McCannJ.T.ShindlerK.L.HammondT.R. (2003). The Science and Pseudoscience of Expert Testimony. In Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology (LilienfeldS.O.LynnS.J.LohrJ.M., eds) pp. 77–108. Guilford Press; New York.
RenfreyG.SpatesC.G. (1994). Eye Movement Desensitization: A Partial Dismantling Study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 231–239.
46.
RosenG.M.DavisonG.C. (2003). Psychology Should Identify Empirically Supported Principles of Change (ESPs) and Not Trademarked Therapies or Other Treatment Packages. Behavior Modification, 27, 300–312.
47.
RosenthalR.FodeK.L.FriedmanC.J.VikanL.L. (1960). Subjects' Perception of their Experimenter under Conditions of Experimenter Bias. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 11, 325–331.
48.
RuckerD.D.PratkanisA.R. (2001). Projection as an Interpersonal Influence Tactic: The Effects of the Pot Calling the Kettle Black. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1494–1507.
49.
ShapiroA.K. (1971). Placebo Effects in Medicine, Psychotherapy, and Psychoanalysis. In Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change: An Empirical Analysis (BerginA.E.GarfieldS.L., eds) pp. 439–473. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; New York.
50.
SingerM.T.LaiichJ. (1996). Crazy Therapies: What are They? Do They Work?Jossey-Bass; San Francisco.
51.
StengerV.J. (1995). The Unconscious Quantum: Metaphysics in Moderen Physics and Cosmology. Prometheus Press; Amherst, N.Y.
52.
Van RillaerJ. (1991). Strategies of Dissimulation in the Pseudosciences. New Ideas in Psychology, 9, 235–244.
53.
WampoldB. (2001). The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models, Methods, and Findings. Erlbaum; Mahwah, NJ.
54.
WilsonN. (2003). Commercializing Mental Health Issues; Entertainment, Advertizing, and Psychological Advice. In Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology (LilienfeldS.O.LynnS.J.LohrJ.M., eds) pp. 425–460. Guilford Press; New York.
