This article describes an innovative project in England whereby child witnesses gave evidence via a video link from a building away from the court complex. The research indicates that this was seen as an effective method for children to give their evidence; removing most of the negative issues relating to giving evidence either in person from the court room, or from a live video link from a room routinely located within the court complex. This arrangement was seen to encourage children to give evidence in the first instance; to improve its quality; and to soften the traditional adversarial nature of the criminal justice system. Professionals in the Crown Court have accepted live video link technology as part of their work role and although the children concerned, and their parents, were not so positive they also considered it to be a very good way for them to give evidence.
CobleyC. (1995). Child Abuse and the Law. Cavendish Publishing; London.
2.
ConnollyM.McKeownP.Milligan-ByrneG. (1994). Making the Public Sector More User Friendly? A Critical Examination of the Citizen's Charter. In Parliamentary Affairs. 47 (1).
DaviesG.WestcottH. (1999). Interviewing Child Witnesses under the Memorandum of Good Practice: A Research Review. Home Office Research Paper 115; London.
6.
DaviesG.NoonE. (1991). An Evaluation of the Live Link for Child Witnesses. Home Office; London.
7.
DentH.FlinR. (1992). Children as Witnesses. John Wiley; London.
DoernG. (1993). The U.K. Citizen's Charter. Policy and Politics, 21(1), 17–29.
10.
EltringhamS.AldridgeJ. (2000). The Extent of Children's Knowledge of Court as Estimated By Guardians ad Litem. In Child Abuse Review, 9, 275–286.
11.
ForlinJ. (1998). Children's Rights and the Developing Law. Butterworth; London.
12.
GoodmanG.TobyA.Batterman-FaunceJ.OrcotH.ThomasS.ShaperoC.SachsenmaierT. (2001). Face to Face Confrontation — Effects of Closed Circuit Technology on Children's Eyewitness Testimony and Jurors' Decisions. In Children and the Law (BullR., ed.). Blackwell; Oxford.
13.
HamlynB.PhelpsA.TurtleJ.SattarG. (2004). Are Special Measures Working? Evidence from Surveys of Vulnerable and Intimidated Witnesses. Home Office Research Study 283. Home Office; London.
14.
Home Office (1990). Victim's Charter: A Statement of the Rights of Victims of Crime. Home Office; London.
15.
Home Office (1995). Victim's Charter: A Statement of the Rights of Victims of Crime. Home Office; London.
16.
Home Office (1998). Speaking up for Justice: Report of the Interdepartmental Working Group on the Treatment of Vulnerable or Intimidated Witnesses in the Criminal Justice System. Home Office; London.
17.
Home Office (2003). New Deal for Victims and Witnesses. National Strategy to Deliver Improved Services. Home Office Communications Directorate; London.
18.
Home Office (2005). Circular to the Police39/2005. Para 2.
19.
HoyanoL. (2001). Striking a Balance Between the Rights of Defendants and Vulnerable Witnesses: Will Special Measures Contravene Guarantees of a Fair Trial?Criminal Law Review, Dec, 948–969.
MeyersJ.B. (1996). A Decade of International Reform to Accommodate Child Witnesses: Steps Towards a Child Witness Code' In International Perspectives on Child Abuse and Children's Testimony (BottomsB.GoodmanG., eds). Sage; Thousand Oaks.
Reid-Howie Associates (2002). Vulnerable and Intimidated Witnesses: Reviews of Provisions in Other Jurisdictions. Scottish Executive Central Research Unit Edinburgh: The Stationary Office.
34.
ReinerR. (2000). Police Research. In Doing Research on Crime and Justice (KingE.WarcupE., eds). Oxford University Press; Oxford.
35.
RichardsJ. (2000). Protecting the Child Witness in Abuse Cases. Family Law Quarterly, 34 (3), 393–421.
36.
Scottish Office (1995). Crime and Criminal Justice Research Findings No. 4: Live Television Link. An Evaluation of its Use by Child Witnesses in Scottish Criminal Trials(accessed at www.scot-land.gov/uk/cru/resfinds/crf04-oohtm).
37.
WelbourneP. (2002). Videotaped Evidence of Children: Application and Implications of the Memorandum of Good Practice. British Journal of Social Work, 23553–571.
38.
WilsonJ. (1996). Citizen Major. The Rationale and Impact of the Citizen's Charter. Public Policy and Administration Review, 11 (1), 45–62.
