In recent years the debate on the legitimacy of the infliction of corporal punishment by parents on their children has been intensified. This traditional parental power has been challenged both at governmental and legislature levels and in the courts, in some cases leading to its prohibition — a policy which has now been endorsed by various international norm-setting bodies.
This article traces the historical development of this abolitionist movement on the international plane and seeks to identify the ideologies which have motivated it. In particular, it assesses the respective roles of the child protection ideology, which is concerned with the prevention of victimization, and the children's rights perspective. The contravening role of the family rights ideology is also considered. The article also uses case-studies to analyse the interplay of these forces on the national level, and considers the usefulness of this analysis to predict abolition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlaimoK. (2002). Historical Roots of Children's Rights in Europe and the United States. In Children as Equals (AlaimoK.KlugB., eds) pp. 1–23. United Press of America; Lanham.
2.
ArchardD. (1993). Children: Rights and Childhood, Routledge; London.
3.
AriesP. (1962). Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family life. Vintage; New York.
4.
BartonC.DouglasG. (1995). Law and Parenthood. Butterworths; London.
5.
BernsteinM.M. (2004). The Decision of the Supreme Court of Canada Upholding the Constitutionality of Section 43 of the Criminal Code of Canada: What this Decision Means to the Child Welfare Sector. OACAS Journal, 48, 2–14.
BitenskyS.H. (1998). Spare the Rod, Embrace our Humanity: Toward a New Legal Regime Prohibiting Corporal Punishment of Children. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 31, 353–474.
8.
BoysonR. (2002). Equal Protection for Children. NSPCC; London.
9.
CarterM. (2005). The Constitutional Validity of the Corporal Punishment Defence in Canada: A Critical Analysis of Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law versus Canada (Attorney General). International Review of Victimology(this issue).
10.
Comment (2004). Mandated Voices for the Vulnerable: An Examination of the Constitutionality of Missouri's Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting Statute. University of Missouri at Kansas City Law Review, 72,1083–1110.
11.
CorbyB. (1992). Alternative Theory Bases in Child Abuse. In Child Abuse and Neglect (RogersStainton, eds). q.v.
12.
DetrickS. (1999). A Commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Nijhoff; The Hague.
13.
DurrantJ. (2003). Legal Reform and Attitudes towards Physical Punishment in Sweden. International Journal of Children's Rights, 11, 147–173.
14.
DurrantJ.JansonS. (2005). Legal Reform, Corporal Punishment and Child Abuse: The Case of Sweden, International Review of Victimology(this issue).
15.
DwyerD. (2003). Case Note: The Duties of Expert Witnesses of Fact and Opinion: R v. Clark (Sally), International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 7, 264–9.
16.
EekelaarJ. (1986). The Emergence of Children's Rights, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 6, 61–182.
17.
FortinJ. (2003). Children's Rights and the Developing Law, 2nd ed., LexisNexisUK.
18.
Fox HardingL. (1991). Perspectives in Child Care Policy. Longmans; London.
19.
Fox HardingL. (1996). Family, State and Social Policy. MacMillan; Basingstoke.
20.
FreemanM. (1999). Children Are Unbeatable. Children and Society, 13, 130–141.
21.
GershoffE.T. (2002). Corporal Punishment by Parents and Associated Child Behaviors and Experiences: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 539–579.
22.
GoldsteinJ.SolnitA.J.GoldsteinS.FreudA. (1986/1966). The Best Interests of the Child: The Least Detrimental Alternative. Free Press; New York.
23.
GordonE. (2001). The Supreme Court in Loco Parentis. Azure, 10, 50–84.
24.
HarnonE. (1988). Examination of Children in Sexual Offences. In The Israeli Law and Practice, Criminal Law Review, 263.
25.
HelferR.E.KempeC.H. (1968). The Battered Child, University of Chicago Press; Chicago.
26.
HolsteinJ.A.MillerG. (1990). Rethinking Victimisation: An Interactional Approach to Victimology. Symbolic Interaction, 13, 103–122.
27.
International Journal of Children’s Rights (2003). Special Issue: Corporal Punishment of Children, 11 (2).
28.
KaplanY. (2002). Children's Rights in Israeli Judgments — the Beginning of a Transition from Paternalism to Autonomy. The Law, 7, 202–334(in Hebrew).
29.
KilkellyU. (1999). The Child and the European Convention on Human Rights. Ashgate; Aldershot.
30.
LandauS.F.SebbaL. (1998). Victimological Research in Israel. In Crime and Criminal Justice in Israel (Friedmann, ed.) pp. 359–387. SUNY; Albany.
31.
LeblancL.J. (1993). The Convention on the Rights of the Child. University of Nebraska Press; Lincoln.
32.
LimH.RocheJ. (2002). Feminism and Children's Rights. In Feminist Perspectives on Child Law (BridgemanJ.MonkD., eds) ch. 12.Cavendish.
33.
Maidment KershnerS. (2001). Children v. Parents: A New Tort Duty-Situation for Psychiatric Injury?Israel Law Review, 35, 79–117.
34.
MasonM.A. (1996). From Father's Property to Children's Rights: The History of Child Custody in the United States. Columbia University Press.
35.
McGillivrayA. (1992). Reconstructing Child Abuse: Western Definition and Non-Western Experience. In The Ideologies of Children's Rights (FreemanM.VeermanP., eds) pp. 213–236. Kluwer; Dordrecht.
36.
McGillivrayA. (2004). Child Physical Assault: Law, Equality and Intervention. Manitoba Law Journal, 30, 133–166.
37.
MinowM. (1986). Rights for the Next Generation: A Feminist Approach to Children's Rights. Harvard Women's Law Journal, 9, 1–24.
38.
MinowM. (1993). Surviving Victim Talk. UCLA Law Review, 40, 1411–1445.
39.
MoragT. (2004). Parental Autonomy and Parens Patriae: A Comparative Analysis of Two Legal Systems, Doctoral dissertation submitted to the University of Michigan Law School (on file at the University of Michigan Law School Library).
40.
NewellP. (2002). Global Progress towards the Habit of Hitting Children. In The New Handbook of Children’s Rights (FranklinB., ed.) pp. 374–387. Routledge; London.
41.
OlsenF. (1992). Some Feminist Approaches to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. In Children, Rights and the Law (AlstonP.ParkerS.SeymourJ., eds) pp. 192–220. Clarendon; Oxford.
42.
OrentlicherD. (1998). Spanking and Other Corporal Punishment of Children by Parents: Overvaluing Pain, Undervaluing Children. Houston Law Review, 35, 147–185.
43.
PlattA. (1969). The Child Savers: The Invention of Delinquency. University of Chicago Press; Chicago.
44.
PollardD. (2002). Banning Corporal Punishment: A Constitutional Analysis. American University Law Review, 52, 447–492.
RobertsJ. (2000). Changing Public Attitudes towards Corporal Punishment: The Effects of Statutory Reform in Sweden. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 1027–1035.
47.
RogersJ. (2002). A Criminal Lawyer's Response to Chastisement in the European Court of Human Rights. Criminal Law Review, 98–113.
48.
RogersJ. (2003). Applying the Doctrine of Positive Obligations of the European Convention of Human Rights to Domestic Substantive Criminal Law in Domestic Proceedings. Criminal Law Review, 690–708.
49.
RothmanD. (1990). The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic, rev. ed., Little Brown; Boston.
50.
ReportRotlevy (2003). Report of the Committee to Study the Basic Principles in the Field of the Child and the Law and their Implementation Headed by Judge Saviona Rotlevy, General Part, Ministry of Justice (in Hebrew).
51.
SchlossmanS. (1995). Delinquent Children: The Juvenile Reform School. In The Oxford History of the Prison (MorrisN.RothmanD.J., eds) pp. 363–389. Oxford University Press; New York.
52.
SchuzR. (2003). ‘Three Years On’: An Analysis of the Delegalization of Physical Punishment of Children by the Israeli Courts. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 11, 235–256.
53.
SebbaL. (1996). Sanctioning Policy in Israel — an Historical Overview. Israel Law Review, 30, 234–275.
54.
SebbaL. (2000). Victims' Rights and Legal Strategies: Israel as a Case Study, Criminal Law Forum, 11, 47–100.
55.
SebbaL. (2003). Sparing the Rod by Court Order: Reflections on a Legal Revolution. In Studies in Corrections in Honour of Menachem Horovitz (HovavM.SebbaL.AmirM., eds) pp. 425–462. Faculty of Law; Jerusalem(in Hebrew).
56.
Stainton RogersW. (1992). Introduction. In Child Abuse and Neglect (Stainton RogersW.HeveyD.RocheJ.AshE., eds) pp. 9–19. Batsford; London.
57.
StraschnovA. (2000). Children and Youth in the Eyes of the Law. Israel Bar; Tel Aviv(in Hebrew).
58.
TurnerS. (2001). Something to Cry about: An Argument against Corporal Punishment of Children in Canada. Wilfred Laurier University Press; Waterloo.
59.
Van BuerenG. (1995). The International Law on the Rights of the Child. Nijhoff; Dordrecht.
60.
Van BuerenG. (1998). International Documents on Children. Nijhoff; Dordrecht.
61.
VeermanP. (1992). The Rights of the Child and the Changing Image of Childhood. Nijhoff; Dordrecht.
