The present study, which was designed to improve understanding of the context, patterns, and meanings of violence against wives, uses a standpoint-based approach which incorporates a symbolic interactionist method and a feminist perspective to examine wife abuse in Mexican-descent families. Findings from the study indicate that wife abuse occurs in the complex context of economic hardship, changes in gender role expectations and performances, and husbands' attempt to maintain male dominance and control of the family. The control aspect of wife abuse was reflected in the patterns of violence used by husbands, the unequal power relationship between husbands and wives, and the differences between wives' and husbands' reactions to family conflicts. These findings suggest that efforts to stop wife abuse need to focus not only on increasing women's economic independence but also on eliminating culture-specific ideologies of male supremacy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckerJ. (1989). The problem with patriarchy. Sociology, 23, 235–240.
2.
AckerJ.BarryK.EsseveldJ. (1996). Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. In Feminism and Social Change (GottfriedHeidi, ed.) pp. 60–87. University of Illinois Press.
3.
American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Violence and the Family. (1996). Violence and the Family. American Psychological Association; Washington, D.C.
4.
Baca-ZinnM. (1982). Chicano men and masculinity. Journal of Ethnic Studies, 10, 27–43.
5.
Baca-ZinnM.DillD. (1993). Difference and domination. In Women of Color in the United States (Baca-ZinnM.DillB., eds.) pp. 3–12. Temple University Press; Philadelphia.
6.
BeanF.D.CurtisR.L.Jr.MarcumJ.P. (1977). Familism and marital satisfaction among Mexican Americans: The effects of family size, wife's labor force participation, and conjugal power. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 759–767.
BogradM. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. In Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse (YlloK.BogradM., eds.) pp. 1–26. Sage; Newbury Park, CA.
9.
CainM. (1986). Realism, feminism, methodology, and law. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 14, 255–267.
10.
CasasJ.M.WagenheimB.R.BancheroR.Mendoza-RomeroJ. (1994). Hispanic masculinity: Myth or psychological schema meriting clinical consideration. Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 16, 315–331.
11.
CastlesS.MillerM. (1993). The Age of Migration. Guilford; New York.
12.
CazenaveN.StrausM. (1979). Race, class, network embeddedness, and family violence: A search for potent support systems. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 10, 281–299.
13.
ChowE.N. (1987). The development of feminist consciousness amongAsian-American women.
Gender & Society, 1, 284–299.
14.
CollinsP. (1990). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge; New York.
15.
ConnelR. (1987). Gender and Power. Stanford University Press; Stanford, CA.
16.
CrowellN.A.BurgessA.W. (1996). Understanding Violence Against Women. National Academy Press; Washington, D.C.
17.
DasguptaS.WarrierS. (1996). In the footsteps of ‘Arundhati’: Asian-Indian women's experience of domestic violence in the U.S. Violence Against Women, 2, 238–259.
18.
DobashR.P.DobashR.E. (1979). Violence Against Wives: A Case Against the Patriarchy. The Free Press; New York.
19.
DobashR.P.DobashR.E.WilsonM.DalyM. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 69–91.
20.
EspirituY. (1997). Asian American Women and Men: Labor, Laws, and Love. Sage; Newbury Park.
21.
FernandezM. (1997). Domestic violence by extended family members in India. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 433–455.
22.
Fernandez-KellyM.P. (1996). Delicate transaction: Gender, home, and employment among Hispanic women. In Through the Prism of Differences (Baca-ZinnM.Hondagneu-SoteloP.MessnerM., eds.) pp. 313–322. Allyn & Bacon; Needham Heights, MA.
23.
GallinR.S. (1992). Wife abuse in the context of development and change: A Chinese (Taiwanese) case. In Sanctions and Sanctuary: Cultural Perspectives on the Beating of Wives (CountsD.A.BrownJ.K.CampbellJ.C., eds.) pp. 219–227. Westview Press; Boulder, CO.
24.
GellesR. (1993). Through a sociological lens: Social structure and family violence. In Current Controversies on Family Violence, (GellesR.LosekeD., eds.) pp. 32–46. Sage; Newbury Park, CA.
25.
GlennE. (1994). Social construction of mothering: A thematic view. In Mothering, Ideology, Experience, and Agency (GlennE.ChangG.ForceyL., eds.) pp. 1–29. Routledge; New York.
GonzalezA. (1982). Sex roles of the traditional Mexican Family: A comparison of Chicano and Anglo Students' Attitudes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 330–339.
GuendelmanS.Perez-ItriagoA. (1987). Double lives: The changing role of women in seasonal migration. Women's Studies, 13, 240–271.
30.
HardingS. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Cornell University Press; Ithaca.
31.
HartmannH. (1981). The family as the locus of gender, class, and political struggle: The example of housework. Signs, 16, 366–395.
32.
HawkesG.TaylorM. (1975). Power structure in Mexican and Mexican-American farm labor families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 807–811.
33.
HearnJ.CollinsonD. (1994). Theorizing unities and differences between men and between masculinities. In Theorizing Masculinities (BrodH.KaufmanM., eds.) pp. 97–118. Sage; Newbury Park.
34.
HochschildA.MachungA. (1989). The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. Viking Penguin; New York.
35.
Hondagneu-SoteloP. (1994). Gender Transitions: Mexican Experiences of Immigration. University of California Press; Berkeley.
36.
HooksB. (1984). Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. South End Press; Boston, MA.
37.
HuismanK.A. (1996). Wife battering in Asian American Communities: Identifying the service needs of an overlooked segment of the U.S. population. Violence Against Women, 2, 260–283.
38.
HydenM. (1995). Verbal aggression as prehistory of women battering. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 55–71.
39.
KasperA. (1986). Consciousness re-evaluated: Interpretive theory and feminist scholarship. Sociological Inquiry, 56, 30–49.
40.
KaufmanM. (1997). Men, feminism, and men's contradictory experiences of power. In Theorizing Masculinities (BrodH.KaufmanM., eds.) pp. 142–163. Sage; Newbury Park.
41.
KeefeS. (1984). Real and Ideal extended familism among Mexican-Americans and Anglo-Americans: On the meaning of ‘close’ family ties. Human Organization, 43, 65–70.
42.
KurzD. (1993). Physical abuse by husbands: A major social problem. In Current Controversies on Family Violence (GellesR.LosekeD.R., eds.) pp. 88–103. Sage; Newbury Park, CA.
43.
LevisonD. (1989). Family Violence in Cross-Cultural Perspective. Sage; Newbury Park, CA.
44.
LockhartL. (1987). A re-examination of the effects of race and social class on the incidence of marital violence: A search for reliable differences. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 603–610.
45.
LockhartL.WhiteB. (1989). Understanding marital violence in the Black community. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 421–436.
46.
McCallM.M.WittnerJ. (1990). The good news about life history. In Symbolic Interaction and Cultural Studies (BeckerH.S.McCallM.M., eds.) pp. 46–89. University of Chicago Press; Chicago.
47.
MesserschmidtJ. (1993). Masculinities and Crime. Rowman & Littlefield; Boston.
48.
MohantyC. (1991). Under Western eyes. In Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. (MohantyC.RussoA.TorresL., eds.) pp. 51–80. Indiana University Press; Bloomington.
PenalosaF. (1968). Mexican Family Roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30, 680–689.
51.
PerillaJ.L.BakermanR.NorrisF.H. (1994). Culture and domestic violence: The ecology of abused Latinas. Violence and Victims, 9, 325–339.
52.
RascheC. (1988). Minority women and domestic violence: The unique dilemmas of battered women of color. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 4, 151–171.
53.
RothmanJ.GantL.M.HnatS. (1985). Mexican-American family culture. Social Service Review, 59, 197–215.
54.
RumbautR. (1996). Origins and destinies: Immigration, race, and ethnicity in contemporary America. In Origins and Destinies: Immigration, Race, and Ethnicity in America (PedrazaS.RumbautR., eds.) pp. 21–42. Wadsworth; Belmont, CA.
55.
SantiagoA.MorashM. (1995). Strategies for serving Latina battered women. In Gender in Urban Research (GarberJ.TurnerR., eds.) pp. 219–235. Sage.
56.
SchechterS. (1982). Women and Male Violence: The Visions and Struggles of the Battered Women's Movement. Pluto Press; London.
57.
SchechterS. (1988). A framework for understanding and empowering battered women. In Abuse and Victimization across the Life Span. (StrausM., ed.) pp. 240–253. Johns Hopkins University Press; Baltimore, Maryland.
58.
SellerM. (1987). Beyond the stereotype: A new look at the immigrant women. In From Different Shores: Perspectives on Race and Ethnicity in America (TakakiR., ed.) pp. 197–203. Oxford University Press; New York.
59.
SmithD.E. (1987). The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Northeastern University Press; Boston.
60.
SmithD.E. (1990). The Conceptual Practice of Power. Northeastern University Press; Boston.
61.
SmithM.D. (1990). Patriarchy ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 5, 257–273.
62.
SotomayorM. (1990). Empowering Hispanic Families: A Cultural Issue in the 1990s. Family Service of America; Milwaukee.
63.
StevensE.P. (1973). Marianismo: The other face of machismo in Latin America. In Female and Male in Latin America (PescatelloA.M., ed.) pp. 89–101. University of Pittsburgh; Pittsburgh, PA.
64.
VegaW.A. (1990). Hispanic families in the 1980s: Adecade of research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 1015–1024.
WatersM.EschbachK. (1995). Immigration and ethnic and racial inequality in the U.S. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 419–446.
67.
WilliamsN. (1990). The Mexican American Family: Tradition and Change. General Hall; New York.
68.
WilliamsO. (1992). Ethnically sensitive practice to enhancetreatment participation of African American men who batter. Families in Society, 73, 588–595.
69.
YbarraL. (1982). When wives work: The impact on the Chicano family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 169–178.
70.
YlloK.A. (1983). Sexual inequality and violence against wives in American States. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 14, 67–86.
71.
YlloK.A. (1984). The status of women, marital equality, and violence against wives. Journal of Family Issues, 5, 307–320.
72.
YlloK.A. (1988). Political and methodological debates in wife abuse research. In Feminist Perspective on Wife Abuse (YlloK.A.BogradM., eds.) pp. 28–51. Sage; Newbury Park, CA.
73.
YlloK.A. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In Current Controversies on Family Violence (GellesR.LosekeD.R., eds.) pp. 47–62. Sage; Newbury Park, CA.
74.
YlloK.A.StrausM. (1984). Patriarchy and violence against wives: The impact of structural and normative factors. Journal of International and Comparative Social Welfare, 1, 1–13.
75.
ZavellaP. (1987). Women's Work and Chicano Families: Cannery Workers of the Santa Clara Valley. Cornell University Press; Ithaca.
