Van Der Maas P., Van Delden Jjm, Pijnenborg L., Looman Cwn.Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. Lancet1991; 338: 669-74.
3.
Gomez CFRegulating death: the case of the Netherlands. New York : The Free Press, 1991.
4.
Fenigsen R.A case against Dutch euthanasia. In: Campbell CS, Crigge B-J eds. Mercy, murder and morality: perspective on euthanasia. Hastings Cent Rep1989; 19 (suppl): 22-30.
5.
KennedyIMcC. The law relating to the terminally ill. In: SaundersC ed. The management of terminal malignant disease, second edition. London: Edward Arnold, 1984: 227-31.
6.
Devlin P ed. Easing the passing . In: The trial of Dr John Bodkin Adams. London: The Bodley Head, 1985.
7.
O'Brien T., Kelly M., Saunders C.Motor neurone disease; a hospice perspective. A review of 124 patients (submitted for publication).
8.
Foley KMThe relationship of pain and symptom management to patient requests for physician-assisted suicide. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management1991; 6: 289-97.
9.
World Health Organization.Cancer pain relief and palliative care. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Geneva: World Health Organization, Technical Report Series 804: 1990.
10.
Saunders C.The problems of euthanasia. Nursing Times1959 Oct 9.
11.
Ryan A.Whose death is it anyway? The Times1991 Aug 14.
12.
Shaw GBAndrocles and the lion overruled. In: Pygmalion. Standard edition. London: Constable & Co. Ltd , 1931: 278.
13.
Cartwright A.The role of the general practitioner in caring for people in the last year of their lives. London: King Edward's Hospital Fund for London, 1990.
14.
Seale C.A comparison of hospice and conventional care. Soc Sci Med1991; 32: 147-52.
