The cost-effectiveness of the Citymission Hospice Programme,Melbourne

Abstract

A quasiexperimental study evaluating the Citymission Hospice Programme, Melbourne, a demonstration programme funded by the WK Kellogg Foundation and the Federal Australian government, is described. Its cost-effectiveness is compared with the best available programme of care, as traditionally delivered. Sixty-five hospice and 55 control patients, and/or their family caregiver, were interviewed monthly until the patient's death, generating 271 patient and 195 caregiver interviews. Patients in the hospice group experienced a small but statistically significant reduction in pain, variously assessed at the first and last assessment. They also suffered similarly small but significant reductions in dyspnoea, insomnia and dissatisfaction with the care at the last assessment before death. Patients in the two groups did not differ in their level of other physical and emotional symptoms or in a number of quality-of-life measures. Relatives and other individuals caring for patients in the hospice group experienced somewhat greater difficulties in their role as caregivers than those in the control group. The care of hospice patients was no less expensive and did not produce a shift to noninstitutional care. It is concluded that the cost and effectiveness of this programme of hospice care is at least equivalent to the best traditional care.

Keywords

cost benefit analysis direct service costs evaluation studies health planning hospices palliative treatment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lack SA , Buckingham RW First American hospice. Newhaven Hospice, 1978.

Parkes CM Terminal care: evaluation of inpatient care at St Christopher's Hospice. Part 1, Views of surviving spouse on effects of the service on the patient. Postgrad Med J 1979; 55: 517-22.

Parkes CM Terminal care: evaluation of inpatient care at St Christopher's Hospice. Part II, Self-assessments of effects of the service on surviving spouses. Postgrad Med J 1979; 55: 523-27.

Parkes CM Terminal care: evaluation of inpatient care at St Christopher's Hospice. Postgrad Med J 1980; 56: 685-89.

Kane RL , Bernstein L. , Wales J. et al. A randomised controlled trial of hospice care. Lancet 1984; 1: 890-94.

Greer DS , Mor V. , Morris JN et al. An alternative in terminal care: results of the National Hospice Study. J Chronic Dis 1986; 39: 9-26.

Mount BM , Scott JF (Editorial) Whither hospice evaluation. J Chronic Dis 1983; 36: 731- 36.

Cook TD , Campbell DT Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.

Onnhaus EE , Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain 1975; 1: 379.

10.

Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire; major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975 ; 1: 223.

11.

Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br Soc Clin Psych 1967; 6: 278.

12.

Spitzer WO , Dobson AJ , Hall J. et al. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients. A concise QL-index for use by physicians. J Chronic Dis 1981; 34: 585-97.

13.

Tunstall J. Old and alone. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.

14.

Karnofsky DA , Abelmann WH et al. The use of nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of carcinoma. Cancer 1948; 1: 634-56.

15.

Baker RJ , Nelder JA The GLIM System, Release 3. Oxford: Numerical Algorithms Group, 1978.

16.

Schlesselman JJ Case control studies. Design conduct and analysis. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1982: 61-62.

17.

Kleinbaum DG , Kupper LL , Morgenstern H. Epidemiologic research. Wadsworth: Belmont, 1982:244,254.

18.

Dunt DR , Evans P. Relative costs of palliative care/hospice services to terminal cancer patients and their families. Department of Community Medicine, The University of Melbourne, 1984. (For copies, apply to DR Dunt at address for correspondence).