‘Theory and practice’: Why does it matter?

Kerlinger F. Foundations of behavioural research. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.

Varpio L Ellaway RH. Shaping our worldviews: a conversation about and of theory. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2021; 26: 339–345.

Greenhalgh T Fisman D Cane DJ , et al. Adapt or die: how the pandemic made the shift from EBM to EBM+ more urgent. BMJ Evid Based Med 2022; 27: 253–260.

Parkkinen V-P Wallmann C Wilde M , et al. Evaluating evidence of mechanisms in medicine: principles and procedures. Cham: Springer Nature, 2018.

Skivington K Matthews L Simpson SA , et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2021; 374: n2061.

Paparini S Papoutsi C Murdoch J , et al. Evaluating complex interventions in context: systematic, meta-narrative review of case study approaches. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21: 225.

Braun V Clark V. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. London: SAGE, 2021.

Tark A Estrada LV Stone PW , et al. Systematic review of conceptual and theoretical frameworks used in palliative care and end-of-life care research studies. Palliat Med. Epub ahead of print 8 September 2022. DOI: 10.1177/02692163221122268.

Jabareen Y. Building a conceptual framework: philosophy, definitions, and procedure. Int J Qual Methods 2009; 8: 49–62.

National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative care. National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care. Clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care. 4th ed. Richmond, VA: National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative care, 2018.

Carayon P Schoofs Hundt A Karsh B-T , et al. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15: i50–i58.