Cancer and its treatment can severely affect sexual health. It is unknown how this may relate to the feelings of closeness between patients and their partners.
Aim:
To assess the association between sexual health and closeness in the relationship in couples coping with advanced cancer.
Design:
This study was part of a prospective multicentre longitudinal observational cohort study on experienced quality of care and quality of life in patients with advanced cancer and their relatives (eQuiPe).
Setting/participants:
Baseline data regarding sexual health and closeness in people with advanced cancer and their partners.
Results:
Out of the 566 dyads, 14 were same-sex couples. Especially male partners showed an interest in sex, but more than half of all patients and partners were not sexually active. Approximately one third experienced sexual dysfunction to be a problem but did not seek specialized support (<10%). There was a positive association between own sexual satisfaction and feelings of closeness in the relationship, which was stronger for partners compared to patients (p < 0.001). Sexual satisfaction of the other person was also related to own feelings of closeness (p = 0.003).
Conclusions:
Couples coping with advanced cancer clearly face challenges regarding sexual health but are not likely to seek specialized support. When discussing sexual health, it is crucial that health care professionals pay attention to the aspects of sexual health that may contribute to feeling close to each other and suggest specialized care if necessary.
Trial registration:
The eQuiPe study is registered as NTR6584 in the Netherlands Trial Register.
MercadanteSVitranoVCataniaV. Sexual issues in early and late stage cancer: a review. Support Care Cancer2010; 18(6): 659–665.
2.
LemieuxLKaiserSPereiraJ, et al. Sexuality in palliative care: patient perspectives. Palliat Med2004; 18(7): 630–637.
3.
McClellandSIHollandKJGriggsJJ. Vaginal dryness and beyond: the sexual health needs of women diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer. J Sex Res2015; 52(6): 604–616.
4.
McClellandS. “I wish I’d known”: patients’ suggestions for supporting sexual quality of life after diagnosis with metastatic breast cancer. Sex Relation Ther2016; 31: 414–431.
5.
JaneckiMKaptaczIJaneckaZ, et al. A pilot study on the quality of sexual life of patients receiving home palliative care in Poland. Sexes2021; 2(2): 174–182.
6.
PDQ Supportive and Palliative Care Editorial Board. Sexuality and Reproductive Issues (PDQ®): health professional version. 2013 Sep 4. In: PDQ cancer information summaries [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute (US), 2002.
7.
BondCBJensenPTGroenvoldM, et al. Prevalence and possible predictors of sexual dysfunction and self-reported needs related to the sexual life of advanced cancer patients. Acta Oncol2019; 58(5): 769–775.
8.
AnanthHJonesLKingM, et al. The impact of cancer on sexual function: a controlled study. Palliat Med2003; 17(2): 202–205.
9.
VitranoVCataniaVMercadanteS. Sexuality in patients with advanced cancer: a prospective study in a population admitted to an acute pain relief and palliative care unit. Am J Hosp Palliat Care2011; 28(3): 198–202.
10.
TaylorB. Experiences of sexuality and intimacy in terminal illness: a phenomenological study. Palliat Med2014; 28(5): 438–447.
11.
FlynnKEJefferyDDKeefeFJ, et al. Sexual functioning along the cancer continuum: focus group results from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). Psychooncology2011; 20(4): 378–386.
12.
van RoijJBromLYoussef-El SoudM, et al. Social consequences of advanced cancer in patients and their informal caregivers: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer2019; 27(4): 1187–1195.
13.
EllKNishimotoRMantellJ, et al. Longitudinal analysis of psychological adaptation among family members of patients with cancer. J Psychosom Res1988; 32(4–5): 429–438.
14.
BadrHHerbertKRecksonB, et al. Unmet needs and relationship challenges of head and neck cancer patients and their spouses. J Psychosoc Oncol2016; 34(4): 336–346.
15.
KarrakerALathamK. In sickness and in health? Physical illness as a risk factor for marital dissolution in later life. J Health Soc Behav2015; 56(3): 420–435.
16.
GilbertEUssherJMHawkinsY. Accounts of disruptions to sexuality following cancer: the perspective of informal carers who are partners of a person with cancer. Health (London)2009; 13(5): 523–541.
17.
GilbertEUssherJMPerzJ. Renegotiating sexuality and intimacy in the context of cancer: the experiences of carers. Arch Sex Behav2010; 39(4): 998–1009.
18.
HawkinsYUssherJGilbertE, et al. Changes in sexuality and intimacy after the diagnosis and treatment of cancer: the experience of partners in a sexual relationship with a person with cancer. Cancer Nurs2009; 32(4): 271–280.
19.
CarlsonLEBultzBDSpecaM, et al. Partners of cancer patients: part 1. Impact, adjustment, and coping across the illness trajectory. J Psychosoc Oncol2000; 18: 39–57.
20.
TanAZimmermannCRodinG. Interpersonal processes in palliative care: an attachment perspective on the patient-clinician relationship. Palliat Med2005; 19(2): 143–150.
21.
ManneSBadrH. Intimate relationships and cancer. In: SullivanKDavilaJ (eds) Support processes in intimate relationships. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp.240–264.
22.
KelemenACagleJChungJ, et al. Assessing the impact of serious illness on patient intimacy and sexuality in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage2019; 58(2): 282–288.
23.
WangKArielloKChoiM, et al. Sexual healthcare for cancer patients receiving palliative care: a narrative review. Ann Palliat Med2018; 7(2): 256–264.
24.
van RoijJZijlstraMHamL, et al. Prospective cohort study of patients with advanced cancer and their relatives on the experienced quality of care and life (eQuiPe study): a study protocol. BMC Palliat Care2020; 19(1): 139.
25.
van de Poll-FranseLVHorevoortsNvan EenbergenM, et al. The patient reported outcomes following initial treatment and long term evaluation of survivorship registry: scope, rationale and design of an infrastructure for the study of physical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivorship cohorts. Eur J Cancer2011; 47(14): 2188–2194.
26.
CellaDFTulskyDSGrayG, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol1993; 11(3): 570–579.
27.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires. EORTC items on sexuality, https://qol.eortc.org/questionnaires/ (accessed 21 October 2019).
28.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires (EORTC) Quality of Life Group (QLG), item library, https://qol.eortc.org/item-library/ (accessed 6 November 2019).
29.
HopwoodPFletcherILeeA, et al. A body image scale for use with cancer patients. Eur J Cancer2001; 37(2): 189–197.
30.
van VerschuerVMVrijlandWWMares-EngelbertsI, et al. Reliability and validity of the Dutch-translated Body Image Scale. Qual Life Res2015; 24(7): 1629–1633.
31.
Diaz-FrutosDBaca-GarciaEGarcia-FoncillasJ, et al. Predictors of psychological distress in advanced cancer patients under palliative treatments. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)2016; 25(4): 608–615.
32.
LeeJJBrideBMillerSE. Development and initial validation of the self-care practices scale (SCPS). Poster session presented at the meeting of the society for social work and research, Washington, DC, 2016.
33.
OsseBHVernooijMJSchadeE, et al. Towards a new clinical tool for needs assessment in the palliative care of cancer patients: the PNPC instrument. J Pain Symptom Manage2004; 28(4): 329–341.
34.
SanghaOStuckiGLiangMH, et al. The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum2003; 49(2): 156–163.
35.
KennyDKashyDACookWL. Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 2006.
36.
AlferesVRKennyDA. SPSS programs for the measurement of nonindependence in standard dyadic designs. Behav Res Methods2009; 41(1): 47–54.
37.
van de Poll-FranseLVMolsFGundyCM, et al. Normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC-sexuality items in the general Dutch population. Eur J Cancer2011; 47(5): 667–675.
KrouwelEMAlbersLFNicolaiMPJ, et al. Discussing sexual health in the medical oncologist’s practice: exploring current practice and challenges. J Cancer Educ2020; 35: 1072–1088.
40.
HordernAJStreetAF. Constructions of sexuality and intimacy after cancer: patient and health professional perspectives. Soc Sci Med2007; 64(8): 1704–1718.
WhiteK. Chapter 17. Sexuality and body image. In: O’ConnorMMArandaS (eds) Palliative care nursing: a guide to practice. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge, 2003, pp.245–258.
45.
BeckAMRobinsonJWCarlsonLE. Sexual values as the key to maintaining satisfying sex after prostate cancer treatment: the physical pleasure-relational intimacy model of sexual motivation. Arch Sex Behav2013; 42(8): 1637–1647.
46.
OberguggenbergerASNageleEInwaldEC, et al. Phase 1-3 of the cross-cultural development of an EORTC questionnaire for the assessment of sexual health in cancer patients: the EORTC SHQ-22. Cancer Med2018; 7(3): 635–645.
47.
GreimelENageleELanceleyA, et al. Psychometric validation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire Sexual Health (EORTC QLQ-SH22). Eur J Cancer2021; 154: 235–245.
BadrHTaylorCL. Sexual dysfunction and spousal communication in couples coping with prostate cancer. Psychooncology2009; 18(7): 735–746.
50.
BoisKBergeronSRosenN, et al. Intimacy, sexual satisfaction, and sexual distress in vulvodynia couples: an observational study. Health Psychol2016; 35(6): 531–540.
51.
ManneSBadrH. Intimacy processes and psychological distress among couples coping with head and neck or lung cancers. Psychooncology2010; 19(9): 941–954.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
