Do journals contribute to the international publication of research in their field? A bibliometric analysis of palliative care journal data

Abstract

Background:

Research is important internationally, impacting on health service provision and patient benefit. Journals play an important dissemination role, but there may be geographical bias, potentially affecting access to evidence.

Aim:

To understand if there is a relationship between the continent of journals and that of contributing authors.

Design:

Bibliometric analysis of journal citation report data (June 2018). Odds ratio of association of an author being from region, region of journal publication, publication model and the number of papers.

Setting:

Journals specialising in palliative care research, with an impact factor above the median impact factor for their most common indexing category.

Results:

Five journals: three published in Europe (Palliative Medicine, BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care, and BMC Palliative Care) and two in North America (Journal of Pain and Symptom Management and Journal of Palliative Medicine). Authors were from 30+ countries, but mostly North America (54.18%) or Europe (27.94%). Preliminary sensitivity tests show that the odds of an author being from a North American institution increase 16.4 times (p < 0.01; 95% confidence interval: 12.9, 20.8) if the region of journal publication is North America. The odds of an author being from a European institution is 14.0 times (p < 0.01; 95% confidence interval: 10.9, 17.9) higher if the region of journal publication is Europe.

Conclusion:

Publishers, editors and authors are concentrated in North America or Europe. North American authors are more present in North American journals and European authors in European journals. This polarised approach, if replicated across readerships, may lead to research waste, duplication, and be sub-optimal for healthcare development.

Keywords

Publication bias publishing editorial policies publications as topic palliative care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dye

Reeder

Terry

. Research for universal health coverage. Sci Transl Med 2013; 5: 199ed13.

Schloemer

Schroder-Back

. Criteria for evaluating transferability of health interventions: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. Implement Sci 2018; 13(1): 88.

Ekmekci

. An increasing problem in publication ethics: publication bias and editors’ role in avoiding it. Med Health Care Philos 2017; 20(2): 171–178.

Harris

Marti

Watt

, et al. Explicit bias toward high-income-country research: a randomized, blinded, crossover experiment of English clinicians. Health Aff 2017; 36(11): 1997–2004.

Harris

Macinko

Jimenez

, et al. Measuring the bias against low-income country research: an Implicit Association Test. Global Health 2017; 13(1): 80.

Akre

Barone-Adesi

Pettersson

, et al. Differences in citation rates by country of origin for papers published in top-ranked medical journals: do they reflect inequalities in access to publication. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2011; 65(2): 119–123.

Chersich

Martin

. Priority gaps and promising areas in maternal health research in low- and middle-income countries: summary findings of a mapping of 2292 publications between 2000 and 2012. Global Health 2017; 13(1): 6.

Clark

Gardiner

Barnes

. International palliative care research in the context of global development: a systematic mapping review 2018; 8(1): 7–18.

Payne

Turner

. Research methodologies in palliative care: a bibliometric analysis. Palliat Med 2008; 22(4): 336–342.

10.

Tieman

Sladek

Currow

. Multiple sources: mapping the literature of palliative care. Palliat Med 2009; 23(5): 425–431.

11.

Pastrana

Vallath

Mastrojohn

, et al. Disparities in the contribution of low- and middle-income countries to palliative care research. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010; 39(1): 54–68.

12.

Lynch

Connor

Clark

. Mapping levels of palliative care development: a global update. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013; 45(6): 1094–1106.

13.

Liu

C-J

Yeh

T-C

Hsu

S-H

, et al. Bibliometric analysis of palliative care-related publication trends during 2001 to 2016. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2018; 35(10): 1280–1286.

14.

Woitha

Garralda

Martin-Moreno

, et al. Ranking of palliative care development in the countries of the European Union. J Pain Symptom Manage 2016; 52(3): 370–377.

15.

Chalmers

Bracken

Djulbegovic

, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet 2014; 383(9912): 156–165.

16.

Rhee

Garralda

Torrado

, et al. Publications on palliative care development can be used as an indicator of palliative care development in Africa. J Palliat Med 2017; 20(12): 1372–1377.

17.

Cheong

Mohan

Warren

, et al. Palliative care research in the Asia Pacific Region: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed publications. J Palliat Med 2018; 22: 545–552.

18.

Patel

Kim

. Contribution of low- and middle-income countries to research published in leading general psychiatry journals, 2002-2004. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 190: 77–78.

19.

Walshe

. Palliative care research: state of play and journal direction. Palliat Med 2017; 31(1): 3–4.

20.

Wheeler

Greene

Tieman

, et al. Key characteristics of palliative care studies reported in the specialized literature. J Pain Symptom Manage 2012; 43(6): 987–992.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB