YardleySMartinsSMWalsheC. Case series and practice reviews: dregs at the bottom of the evidence pile or an essential link between frontline practice and research?Palliat Med2019; 33(1): 3–4.
2.
KhalilHRistevskiE. The challenges of evidence-based palliative care research. Int J Evid Based Healthc2018;16(3): 136–137.
3.
KitsonAL. The uncertainty and incongruity of evidence-based healthcare. Int J Evid Based Healthc2008; 6(1): 1–2.
4.
GabbayJMayAI. Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?” ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ2004; 329(7473): 1013.
5.
NonakaI. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci1994; 5(1): 14–37.
6.
WieringaSGreenhalghT. 10 years of mindlines: a systematic review and commentary. Implement Sci2015; 10(1): 45.
7.
BengoughTBovetEBécherrazC, et al. Swiss family physicians’ perceptions and attitudes towards knowledge translation practices. BMC Fam Pract2015; 16(177).
8.
LomasJ. The in-between world of knowledge brokering. BMJ2007; 334(7585): 129–132.
9.
CornerJ. Critical reflection in challenging times: how can research influence policy and practice. In: Voluntary sector and volunteering research conference, 8th September 2015.
10.
ChurrucaKLudlowKTaylorN, et al. The time has come: Embedded implementation research for health care improvement. J Eval Clin Pract2019.
11.
LocockLDopsonSChambersD, et al. Understanding the role of opinion leaders in improving clinical effectiveness. Social Science & Medicine2001; 53(6): 745–757.
12.
GabbayJMayAl. Practice-based evidence for healthcare: clinical mindlines. New York: Routledge, 2011.
13.
CollierAGottM. Engaging patients and families in the organisation, care and research of palliative care. In: JohnstonBPrestonNWalsheC (eds) Palliative nursing, 3ed. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2018, p. in press.
14.
ScottIASoonJElshaugAG, et al. Countering cognitive biases in minimising low value care. Med J Aust2017; 206(9): 407–411.
15.
CharonRWyerP. The art of medicine: narrative evidenced based medicine. The Lancet2008; 371: 296–297.
16.
CharonR. Narrative medicine: honoring the stories of illness. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
17.
NicolineDGherardiSYanowD. Introduction: towards a practice-based view of knowledge and learning. 2004.
18.
CunninghamAMShirleyA. Mindlines in a digital age. Educ Prim Care2015; 26(5): 293–296.
19.
MarieCAShirleyA. Mindlines in a digital age. Educ Prim Care2015; 26(5): 293–296.
20.
GabbayJLeMay Ae. Practice-based evidence for healthcare: clinical mindlines. London; New York: Routledge; 2011. p. xix, 269.
21.
AvornJSoumeraiSB. Improving drug therapy decisions through educational outreach: A Randomised controlled trial of academicall based detailingN Engl J Med1983; 308: 1457–1463.
22.
CollierARowettDAllcroftP, et al. Academic detailing of general practitioners by a respiratory physician for diagnosis and management of refractory breathlessness: a randomised pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res2015; 15: 193.
23.
TiemanJ. Ensuring quality in online palliative care resources. Cancers2016; 8(12): 113.
24.
RawlingsDMiller-LewisLCollienD, et al. Lessons learned from the Dying2Learn MOOC: pedagogy, platforms and partnerships. Educ Sci2017; 7(3): 67.
25.
IedemaRCarrollKCollierA, et al. Video reflexive ethnography in health research and healthcare improvement: theory and application. 1st ed. CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group; 2019.
26.
CollierAHodginsMCrawfordG, et al. What does it take to deliver brilliant home-based palliative care? Using positive organisational scholarship and video reflexive ethnography to explore the complexities of palliative care at home. Palliat Med2018.
27.
ChhinaHBholeVMGoldsmithC, et al. Effectiveness of academic detailing to optimize medication prescribing behaviour of family physicians. J Pharm Pharm Sci2013; 16(4): 511–529.
