The complex relationship between household income of family caregivers,access to palliative care services and place of death: A national household population survey

Abstract

Background:

Previous work shows that more affluent patients with cancer are more likely to die at home, whereas those dying from non-cancer conditions are more likely to die in hospital. Family caregivers are an important factor in determining place of death.

Aim:

To investigate associations between family caregivers’ household income, patients’ access to specialist palliative care and place of patients’ death, by level of personal end-of-life care.

Design:

A cross-sectional community household population survey.

Setting and participants:

Respondents to the Household Survey for England.

Results:

One-third of 1265 bereaved respondents had provided personal end-of-life care (caregivers) (30%). Just over half (55%) of decedents accessed palliative care services and 15% died in a hospice. Place of death and access to palliative care were strongly related (p < 0.001). Palliative care services reduced the proportion of deaths in hospital (p < 0.001), and decedents accessing palliative care were more likely to die at home than those who did not (p < 0.001). Respondents’ income was not associated with palliative care access (p = 0.233). Overall, respondents’ income and home death were not related (p = 0.106), but decedents with caregivers in the highest income group were least likely to die at home (p = 0.069).

Conclusion:

For people who had someone close to them die, decedents’ access to palliative care services was associated with fewer deaths in hospital and more home deaths. Respondents’ income was unrelated to care recipients’ place of death when adjusted for palliative care access. When only caregivers were considered, decedents with caregivers from higher income quartiles were the least likely to die at home. Family caregivers from higher income brackets are likely to be powerful patient advocates. Caregiver information needs must be addressed especially with regard to stage of disease, aim of care and appropriate interventions at the end of life.

Keywords

Caregivers palliative care socioeconomic status place of death household income carers population survey

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Pring

Verne

Deprivation and death: variation in place and cause of death. National End of Life Care Intelligence Network, http://www.endoflifecare-intelligence.org.uk/resources/publications/deprivation_and_death (accessed 1 February 2012).

Currow

Burns

Abernethy

AP.

Place of death for people with noncancer and cancer illness in South Australia: a population-based survey. J Palliat Care 2008; 24(3): 144–150.

Ahmed

Bestall

Ahmedzai

et al

Systematic review of the problems and issues of accessing specialist palliative care by patients, carers and health and social care professionals. Palliat Med 2004; 18(6): 525–542.

Grande

Farquhar

Barclay

et al

The influence of patient and carer age in access to palliative care services. Age Ageing 2006; 35(3): 267–273.

Davidson

Abernethy

Newton

et al

The care-giving perspective in heart failure: a population based study. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13: 342.

Gadoud

Kane

Macleod

et al

Palliative care among heart failure patients in primary care: a comparison to cancer patients using English family practice data. PLoS ONE 2014; 9(11): e113188.

Walshe

Todd

Caress

et al

Patterns of access to community palliative care services: a literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009; 37(5): 884–912.

Chen

Nicolson

Macleod

et al

Does the use of specialist palliative care services modify the effect of socioeconomic status on place of death? A systematic review. Palliat Med 2016; 30: 434–445.

Grande

Addington-Hall

Todd

CJ.

Place of death and access to home care services: are certain patient groups at a disadvantage?

Soc Sci Med 1998; 47(5): 565–579.

10.

Johnson

Allgar

Macleod

et al

Family caregivers who would be unwilling to provide care at the end of life again: findings from the Health Survey for England population survey. PLoS ONE 2016; 11(1): e0146960.

11.

Boodhna

Bridges

Darton

et al

Health Survey for England 2013 (HSE 2013). Volume 2: methods and documentation. London: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL, 2013.

12.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Prices and Purchasing Power Parities: Monthly comparative price levels, http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=CPL# (accessed 7 April 2016).

13.

Observational studies: getting clear about transparency. PLoS Med 2014; 11(8): e1001711.

14.

De Roo

Miccinesi

Onwuteaka-Philipsen

et al

Actual and preferred place of death of home-dwelling patients in four European countries: making sense of quality indicators. PLoS ONE 2014; 9(4): e93762.

15.

Costa

Earle

Esplen

et al

The determinants of home and nursing home death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Palliat Care 2016; 15: 8.

16.

Bell

Somogyi-Zalud

Masaki

KH.

Factors associated with congruence between preferred and actual place of death. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010; 39(3): 591–604.

17.

Brogaard

Neergaard

Sokolowski

et al

Congruence between preferred and actual place of care and death among Danish cancer patients. Palliat Med 2013; 27(2): 155–164.

18.

Gomes

Calanzani

Koffman

et al

Is dying in hospital better than home in incurable cancer and what factors influence this? A population-based study. BMC Med 2015; 13: 235.

19.

Sorensen

Van den

Fullam

et al

Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 80.

20.

McIlvennan

Allen

LA.

Palliative care in patients with heart failure. BMJ 2016; 353: i1010.

21.

Boland

Martin

Wells

et al

Palliative care for people with non-malignant lung disease: summary of current evidence and future direction. Palliat Med 2013; 27(9): 811–816.

22.

Barclay

Momen

Case-Upton

et al

End-of-life care conversations with heart failure patients: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. Br J Gen Pract 2011; 61(582): e49–e62.

23.

Sidebottom

Jorgenson

Richards

et al

Inpatient palliative care for patients with acute heart failure: outcomes from a randomized trial. J Palliat Med 2015; 18(2): 134–142.

24.

Farquhar

Prevost

McCrone

et al

The clinical and cost effectiveness of a Breathlessness Intervention Service for patients with advanced non-malignant disease and their informal carers: mixed findings of a mixed method randomised controlled trial. Trials 2016; 17(1): 185.

25.

Higginson

Bausewein

Reilly

et al

An integrated palliative and respiratory care service for patients with advanced disease and refractory breathlessness: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2: 979–987.

26.

Bruhn

Rebach

HM.

Socioeconomic status and caregiving. In: Bruhn

Rebach

(eds) The sociology of caregiving (Clinical sociology: research and practice). Heidelberg; New York; London; Dordrecht: Springer, 2014, pp. 79–85.

27.

Colvin

. National survey of bereaved people (VOICES): England, 2015 – quality of care delivered in the last 3 months of life for adults who died in England. Office for National Statistics, https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/healthcaresystem/bulletins/nationalsurveyofbereavedpeoplevoices/england2015 (accessed 22 April 2016).