Seeing is believing – healthcare professionals’ perceptions of a complex intervention to improve care towards the end of life: A qualitative interview study

Abstract

Background:

Methods to improve care, trust and communication are important in acute hospitals. Complex interventions aimed at improving care of patients approaching the end of life are increasingly common. While evaluating outcomes of complex interventions is essential, exploring healthcare professionals’ perceptions is also required to understand how they are interpreted; this can inform training, education and implementation strategies to ensure fidelity and consistency in use.

Aim:

To explore healthcare professionals’ perceptions of using a complex intervention (AMBER care bundle) to improve care for people approaching the end of life and their understandings of its purpose within clinical practice.

Design:

Qualitative study of healthcare professionals. Analysis informed by Medical Research Council guidance for process evaluations.

Setting/participants:

A total of 20 healthcare professionals (12 nursing and 8 medical) interviewed from three London tertiary National Health Service hospitals. Healthcare professionals recruited from palliative care, oncology, stroke, health and ageing, medicine, neurology and renal/endocrine services.

Results:

Three views emerged regarding the purpose of a complex intervention towards the end of life: labelling/categorising patients, tool to change care delivery and serving symbolic purpose indirectly affecting behaviours of individuals and teams. All impact upon potential utility of the intervention. Participants described the importance of training and education alongside implementation of the intervention. However, adequate exposure to the intervention was essential to witness its potential added value or embed it into practice.

Conclusion:

Understanding differing interpretations of complex interventions is essential. Consideration of ward composition, casemix and potential exposure to the intervention is critical for their successful implementation.

Keywords

Complex intervention uncertainty qualitative hospital palliative care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman. Dying without dignity: investigations by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman into complaints about end of life care. London: Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman, 2015.

Etkind

Koffman

Approaches to managing uncertainty in people with life-limiting conditions: role of communication and palliative care. Postgrad Med J 2016; 92: 412–417.

Department of Health. More care, less pathway: a review of the Liverpool Care Pathway. London: Department of Health, 2013.

The Stationery Office. The Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust: public inquiry, chaired by Robert Francis QC. London: The Stationery Office, 2013.

National End of Life Care Intelligence Network. National End of Life Care Intelligence Network – predicting death. National End of Life Care Programme, Leicester, February 2011.

Clark

Armstrong

Allan

et al . Imminence of death among hospital inpatients: prevalent cohort study. Palliat Med 2014; 28: 474–479.

Department of Health. End of Life Care Strategy: promoting high quality care for all adults at the end of life. London: Department of Health, 2008.

Medical Research Council (MRC). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. London: MRC, 2008.

Higginson

Evans

Grande

et al . Evaluating complex interventions in End of Life Care: the MORECare Statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews. BMC Medicine 2013; 11: 111.

10.

Sleeman

Collis

The Liverpool care pathway: a cautionary tale. BMJ 2013; 347: f4779.

11.

Damschroder

Aron

Keith

et al . Fostering implementation of health services research findings in practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009; 4: 50.

12.

Carey

Shouls

Bristowe

et al . Improving care for patients whose recovery is uncertain. The AMBER care bundle: design, implementation and clinical outcomes. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2015: 5: 12–18.

13.

Bristowe

Carey

Hopper

et al . Patient and carer experiences of clinical uncertainty and deterioration, in the face of limited reversibility: a comparative observational study of the AMBER care bundle. Palliat Med 2015; 29: 797–807.

14.

Currow

Higginson

Time for a prospective study to evaluate the Amber Care Bundle. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2013; 3: 376–377.

15.

Ritchie

The applications of qualitative methods to social research. In: Ritchie

Lewis

(eds) Qualitative research practice. London: SAGE, 2003, pp. 24–46.

16.

Ritchie

Lewis

Elam

Designing and selecting samples. In: Ritchie

Lewis

(eds) Qualitative research practice. London: SAGE, 2003, pp. 77–108.

17.

Sleeman

Koffman

Bristowe

et al . ‘It doesn’t do the care for you’: a qualitative study of health care professionals’ perceptions of the benefits and harms of integrated care pathways for end of life care prior to the Neuberger review. BMJ Open 2015; 5: e008242.

18.

Greenhalgh

Robert

Macfarlane

et al . Conceptual model for considering the determinants of diffusion, dissemination, and implementation of Innovations in health service delivery and organization. Milbank Quarter 2004; 82: 581–629.

19.

Etkind

Karno

Edmonds

et al . Supporting patients with uncertain recovery: the use of the AMBER care bundle in an acute hospital. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2015; 5: 95–98.

20.

Rello

Afonso

Lisboa

et al . A care bundle approach for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013; 19: 363–369.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB