In recognition of the ongoing discussion on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, the Board of Directors of the European Association for Palliative Care commissioned this white paper from the palliative care perspective.
Aim:
This white paper aims to provide an ethical framework for palliative care professionals on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. It also aims to provide an overview on the available evidence as well as a discourse of ethical principles related to these issues.
Design:
Starting from a 2003 European Association for Palliative Care position paper, 21 statements were drafted and submitted to a five-round Delphi process
Participants:
A panel with 17 experts commented on the paper in round 1. Board members of national palliative care or hospice associations that are collective members of European Association for Palliative Care were invited to an online survey in rounds 2 and 3. The expert panel and the European Association for Palliative Care board members participated in rounds 4 and 5. This final version was adopted as an official position paper of the European Association for Palliative Care in April 2015.
Results:
Main topics of the white paper are concepts and definitions of palliative care, its values and philosophy, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, key issues on the patient and the organizational level. The consensus process confirmed the 2003 European Association for Palliative Care white paper and its position on the relationship between palliative care and euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.
Conclusion:
The European Association for Palliative Care feels that it is important to contribute to informed public debates on these issues. Complete consensus seems to be unachievable due to incompatible normative frameworks that clash.
MaterstvedtLJClarkDEllershawJ. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a view from an EAPC Ethics Task Force. Palliat Med2003; 17: 97–101; discussion 102–79.
SteckNEggerMMaessenM. Euthanasia and assisted suicide in selected European countries and US states: systematic literature review. Med Care2013; 51: 938–944.
11.
Onwuteaka-PhilipsenBDBrinkman-StoppelenburgAPenningC. Trends in end-of-life practices before and after the enactment of the euthanasia law in the Netherlands from 1990 to 2010: a repeated cross-sectional survey. Lancet2012; 380: 908–915.
SchmidlinEElgerBSMcLennanS.Assisted suicide in Switzerland: where do we come from and where are we going?Eur J Palliat Care2014; 21: 61–65.
18.
Staten-Generaal EKd. Toetsing van levensbeëindiging op verzoek en hulp bij zelfdoding en wijziging van het Wetboek van Strafrecht en van de Wet op de lijkbezorging (Wet toetsing levensbeëindiging op verzoek en hulp bij zelfdoding). ‘s-Gravenhage: Sdu Uitgevers, https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/kst-20002001-26691-137b.html (2001, accessed date 18 February 2014).
SepulvedaCMarlinAYoshidaT. Palliative Care: the World Health Organization’s global perspective. J Pain Symptom Manag2002; 24: 91–96.
27.
RadbruchLPayneSBercovitchM. White paper on standards and norms for hospice and palliative care in Europe: part 2 – recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care. Eur J Palliat Care2010; 17: 22–33.
28.
RadbruchLPayneSBercovitchM. White paper on standards and norms for hospice and palliative care in Europe: part 1 – recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care. Eur J Palliat Care2009; 16: 278–289.
CentenoCClarkDLynchT. Facts and indicators on palliative care development in 52 countries of the WHO European region: results of an EAPC Task Force. Palliat Med2007; 21: 463–471.
31.
HumeD.A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958.
32.
MaterstvedtLJKaasaS.Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Scandinavia – with a conceptual suggestion regarding international research in relation to the phenomena. Palliat Med2002; 16: 17–32.
33.
KimsmaGKvan LeeuwenE. Comparing two euthanasia protocols: the Free University of Amsterdam Academic Hospital and the Medical Center of Alkmaar. In: ThomasmaDCKimbrough-KushnerTKimsmaGK. (eds) Asking to die: inside the Dutch debate about euthanasia. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998, pp. 115–133.
ParisJJ.Why involve physicians in assisted suicide?Am J Bioeth2009; 9: 32–34.
36.
BoudreauJDSomervilleMA.Euthanasia is not medical treatment. Br Med Bull2013; 106: 45–66.
37.
DelbekeE.The way assisted suicide is legalised: balancing a medical framework against a demedicalised model. Eur J Health Law2011; 18: 149–162.
38.
LegetC.Assisted dying – the current debate in the Netherlands. Eur J Palliat Care2013; 20: 168–171.
39.
MaterstvedtLJPalliative care ethics: the problems of combining palliation and assisted dying. Progr Palliat Care2013; 3: 158–164.
40.
ChernyNIRadbruchL.European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care. Palliat Med2009; 23: 581–593.
41.
PastranaTJungerSOstgatheC. A matter of definition – key elements identified in a discourse analysis of definitions of palliative care. Palliat Med2008; 22: 222–232.
42.
EmanuelEJFaircloughDLEmanuelLL.Attitudes and desires related to euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide among terminally ill patients and their caregivers. JAMA2000; 284: 2460–2468.
43.
CoyleNSculcoL.Expressed desire for hastened death in seven patients living with advanced cancer: a phenomenologic inquiry. Oncol Nurs Forum2004; 31: 699–709.
44.
PestingerMStielSElsnerF. The desire to hasten death: using Grounded Theory for a better understanding ‘When perception of time tends to be a slippery slope’. Palliat Med2015; 28: 711–719.
45.
StielSPestingerMMoserA. The use of Grounded theory in palliative care: methodological challenges and strategies. J Palliat Med2010; 13: 997–1003.
46.
OhnsorgeKKellerHRWiddershovenGA. ‘Ambivalence’ at the end of life: how to understand patients’ wishes ethically. Nurs Ethics2012; 19: 629–641.
47.
MassoMAllinghamSFBanfieldM. Palliative Care Phase: inter-rater reliability and acceptability in a national study. Palliat Med2015; 29: 22–30.
48.
BroeckaertBNunez-OlarteJM.Sedation in palliative care: facts and concepts. In: Ten HaveHClarkD (eds) The ethics of palliative care European perspectives. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2002, pp. 166–180.
49.
RietjensJAvan der HeideAVrakkingAM. Physician reports of terminal sedation without hydration or nutrition for patients nearing death in the Netherlands. Ann Intern Med2004; 141: 178–185.
50.
MaltoniMScarpiERosatiM. Palliative sedation in end-of-life care and survival: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol2012; 30: 1378–1383.
51.
BarathiBChandraPS.Palliative sedation in advanced cancer patients: does it shorten survival time? A systematic review. Indian J Palliat Care2013; 19: 40–47.
52.
BernheimJLDeschepperRDistelmansW. Development of palliative care and legalisation of euthanasia: antagonism or synergy?BMJ2008; 336: 864–867.
53.
Vanden BerghePMullieADesmetM. Assisted dying – the current situation in Flanders: euthanasia embedded in palliative care. Eur J Palliat Care2013; 20: 266–272.
54.
FerrandEDreyfusJFChastrusseM. Evolution of requests to hasten death among patients managed by palliative care teams in France: a multicentre cross-sectional survey (DemandE). Eur J Cancer2012; 48: 368–376.
55.
OhnsorgeKGudatHRehmann-SutterC.Intentions in wishes to die: analysis and a typology – a report of 30 qualitative case studies of terminally ill cancer patients in palliative care. Psychooncology2014; 23: 1021–1026.
56.
GuirimandFDuboisELaporteL. Death wishes and explicit requests for euthanasia in a palliative care hospital: an analysis of patients files. BMC Palliat Care2014; 13: 53.
57.
MaterstvedtLJ.Inappropriate conclusions in research on assisted dying. J Med Ethics2009; 35: 272.
58.
LewisP.Euthanasia in Belgium five years after legalisation. Eur J Health Law2009; 16: 125–138.
59.
RandallF.Commentary on ‘Assisted dying – the current situation in Flanders: euthanasia embedded in palliative care’. Eur J Palliat Care2013; 20: 273–276.
60.
BattinMPvan der HeideAGanziniL. Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in ‘vulnerable’ groups. J Med Ethics2007; 33: 591–597.
61.
SteckNJunkerCMaessenM. Suicide assisted by right-to-die associations: a population based cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. Epub ahead of print 18February2014. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyu010.
62.
RietjensJAvan der MaasPJOnwuteaka-PhilipsenBD. Two decades of research on euthanasia from The Netherlands. What have we learnt and what questions remain?J Bioeth Inq2009; 6: 271–283.
63.
van der HeideAOnwuteaka-PhilipsenBDRurupML. End-of-life practices in the Netherlands under the Euthanasia Act. New Engl J Med2007; 356: 1957–1965.
LofmarkRNilstunTCartwrightC. Physicians’ experiences with end-of-life decision-making: survey in 6 European countries and Australia. BMC Med2008; 6: 4.
67.
RadbruchLde LimaLLohmannD. The Prague Charter: urging governments to relieve suffering and ensure the right to palliative care. Palliat Med2013; 27: 101–102.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
