‘Less ticking the boxes,more providing support’: A qualitative study on health professionals’ concerns towards the Liverpool Care of the Dying Pathway

Abstract

Background:

Despite being widely used, research into the effectiveness of the Liverpool Care of the Dying Pathway (LCP) and associated cases of malpractice does not match dissemination. No study exists focusing on concerns voiced by professionals.

Aim:

To explore the views of professionals who, during the hospital implementation of the Italian version of the Liverpool Care of the Dying Pathway (LCP-I), voiced or showed concerns towards it.

Design:

A qualitative study nested within the LCP-I randomized cluster trial, with semi-structured interviews analysed using thematic analysis.

Setting and participants:

Six nurses and five physicians from six out of the eight hospital wards who completed the LCP-I implementation were interviewed. Eligibility criteria were having taken part in all steps of the LCP-I Programme, voiced or somehow shown concerns, or failed to fully engage with the implementation process.

Results:

A total of 12 categories were identified, referring to four topics: the Implementation Programme, the LCP-I clinical documentation, the hospital environment and the educational and professional background of hospital healthcare staff. Issues raised by participants concerned both ‘real’ characteristics of the LCP-I and a misinterpretation of the LCP-I approach and clinical documentation. Furthermore, difficulties were reported which were not linked to the Programme but rather to end-of-life care.

Conclusion:

This study provides insights into the experience of professionals with negative opinions of or concerns with the LCP-I. A more comprehensive approach to professional training in palliative care is needed and may envisage the development of new interventions aimed at improving the quality of care throughout the illness trajectory.

Keywords

End-of-life care LCP ward professionals interviews qualitative research thematic analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Singer

Bowman

. Quality end-of-life care: a global perspective. BMC Palliat Care 2002; 1: 4.

End-of-life care: the neglected core business of medicine. Lancet 2012; 379(9822): 1171.

Department of Health. End of life care strategy: promoting high quality care for all adults at the end of life. London: Department of Health, 2008, pp. 1–167.

The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: the study to understand prognosis and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA 1995; 274: 1591–1598.

Bailey

Burgio

Woodby

. Improving processes of hospital care during the last hours of life. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 1722–1727.

Luhrs

Meghani

Homel

. Pilot of a pathway to improve the care of imminently dying oncology inpatients in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005; 29(6): 544–551.

Ellershaw

Ward

. Care of the dying patient: the last hours or days of life. BMJ 2003; 326: 30–34.

Chan

Webster

. End-of-life care pathways for improving outcomes in caring for the dying. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 1: CD008006.

UK Department of Health. Review of Liverpool Care Pathway for dying patients, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-liverpool-care-pathway-for-dying-patients (2013, accessed 4 June 2014).

10.

Costantini

Romoli

Di Leo

. Liverpool Care Pathway for patients with cancer in hospital: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet 2014; 383: 226–237.

11.

Costantini

Ottonelli

Canavacci

. The effectiveness of the Liverpool Care Pathway in improving end of life care for dying cancer patients in hospital. A cluster randomised trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11: 13.

12.

Klabunde

Willis

Casalino

. Facilitators and barriers to survey participation by physicians: a call to action for researchers. Eval Health Prof 2013; 36(3): 279–295.

13.

Tong

Sainsbury

Craig

. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19(6): 349–357.

14.

Braun

Clarke

. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3(2): 77–101.

15.

Gambles

Sirzaker

Jack

. The Liverpool Care Pathway in hospices: an exploratory study of doctor and nurse perceptions. Int J Palliat Nurs 2006; 12: 414–421.

16.

Walker

Read

. The Liverpool Care Pathway in intensive care: an exploratory study of doctor and nurse perceptions. Int J Palliat Nurs 2010; 16(6): 267–273.

17.

Glare

Virik

Jones

. A systematic review of physicians’ survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients. BMJ 2003; 327(7408): 195–198.

18.

Gibbins

McCoubrie

Alexander

. Diagnosing dying in the acute hospital setting – are we too late? Clin Med 2009; 9(2): 116–119.

19.

Parry

Seymour

Whittaker

. Rapid evidence review: pathways focused on the dying phase in end of life care and their key components. Nottingham: Sue Rider Care Centre for the Study of Supportive, Palliative and End of Life Care, NHS National End of Life Care Programme, 2013, pp. 1–35.

20.

Hancock

Clayton

Parker

. Truth-telling in discussing prognosis in advanced life-limiting illnesses: a systematic review. Palliat Med 2007; 21(6): 507–517.

21.

Parker

Clayton

Hancock

. A systematic review of prognostic/end-of-life communication with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: patient/caregiver preferences for the content, style, and timing of information. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007; 34(1): 81–93.

22.

Rodin

Mackay

Zimmermann

. Clinician-patient communication: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2009; 17(6): 627–644.

23.

Rodin

Zimmermann

Mayer

. Clinician-patient communication: evidence-based recommendations to guide practice in cancer. Curr Oncol 2009; 16(6): 42–49.

24.

Fine

Reid

Shengelia

. Directly observed patient-physician discussions in palliative and end-of-life care: a systematic review of the literature. J Palliat Med 2010; 13(5): 595–603.

25.

Lokker

van Zuylen

Veerbeek

. Awareness of dying: it needs words. Support Care Cancer 2012; 20(6): 1227–1233.

26.

Di Leo

Beccaro

Finelli

. Expectations about and impact of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient in an Italian hospital. Palliat Med 2011; 25: 293–303.

27.

Clark

Sheward

Marshall

. Staff perceptions of end-of-life care following implementation of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient in the acute care setting: a New Zealand perspective. J Palliat Med 2012; 15(4): 468–473.

28.

Sykes

. The end of the Liverpool Care Pathway? Lancet Oncol 2013; 14(10): 926–927.

29.

Aldridge

. LCP: an effective tool in well-trained hands. Int J Palliat Nurs 2009; 15(9): 421.

30.

Chapman

. The Liverpool Care Pathway: ‘tick box’ approach not encouraged. Int J Palliat Nurs 2009; 15(9): 420–421.

31.

George

Martin

Robinson

. The Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying (LCP): lost in translation and a tale of elephants, men, myopia – and a horse. Palliat Med 2014; 28(1): 3–7.

32.

Zimmermann

Rodin

. The denial of death thesis: sociological critique and implications for palliative care. Palliat Med 2004; 18: 121–128.

33.

McConnell

O’Halloran

Porter

. Systematic realist review of key factors affecting the successful implementation and sustainability of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2013; 10(4): 218–237.

34.

Parker

. We need an alternative to the Liverpool care pathway for patients who might recover. BMJ 2013; 346: f3702.

35.

Higginson

Koffman

Hopkins

. Development and evaluation of the feasibility and effects on staff, patients, and families of a new tool, the Psychosocial Assessment and Communication Evaluation (PACE), to improve communication and palliative care in intensive care and during clinical uncertainty. BMC Med 2013; 11: 213.