Relatives looking after a terminally ill family member at home face numerous challenges. Studies into relatives’ experiences of home caregiving have been criticised for their descriptive nature and lack of theoretical underpinnings.
Aim:
To explore the emotional challenges faced by home caregivers, and their experiences of healthcare professionals, from the perspective of existential psychology.
Design:
A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed thematically using the Framework approach.
Setting/participants:
The study took place within an inner-city London hospice. Participants (n = 15) were recently bereaved adult relatives of cancer patients who cared for their family member at home.
Results:
Participants’ experiences of being a caregiver and of professional support were highly varied. The analysis generated 15 themes which were organised into a framework based on Yalom’s four ‘existential conditions’: responsibility (e.g. ‘being the linchpin of care’; ‘you only have one chance to get it right’), isolation (e.g. ‘being on my own’, ‘being held in mind’), death (e.g. ‘knowing but not knowing’) and meaningfulness (e.g. ‘giving something back’, ‘acceptance and gratitude’). Healthcare professionals were perceived as influential in both helping and hindering relatives in meeting the challenges they faced.
Conclusion:
Existential psychology provides a theoretical perspective from which to understand the psychological complexity of the emotional challenges home caregivers face and a framework which may usefully inform research and clinical practice. Professionals’ attentiveness to caregivers’ needs can have powerful effects in assuaging anxiety, reducing isolation and enabling relatives to connect with the meaningfulness of caregiving.
Department of Health. End of life care strategy. London: Department of Health, 2010.
2.
ExleyCAllenD. A critical examination of home care: end of life care as an illustrative case. Soc Sci Med2007; 65(11): 2317–2327.
3.
HudsonP. Improving support for family carers: key implications for research, policy and practice. Palliat Med2013; 27(7): 581–582.
4.
Department of Health. First national VOICES survey of bereaved people: key findings report. London: Department of Health, 2012.
5.
LinderholmMFriedrichsenM. A desire to be seen: family caregivers’ experiences of their caring role in palliative home care. Cancer Nurs2010; 33(1): 28–36.
6.
Wennman-LarsenATishelmanC. Advanced home care for cancer patients at the end of life: a qualitative study of hopes and expectations of family caregivers. Scand J Caring Sci2002; 16(3): 240–247.
7.
ProotIMAbu-SaadHHCrebolderHFJM. Vulnerability of family caregivers in terminal palliative care at home; balancing between burden and capacity. Scand J Caring Sci2003; 17(2): 113–121.
8.
BrobäckGBerteröC. How next of kin experience palliative care of relatives at home. Eur J Cancer Care2003; 12(4): 339–346.
9.
MilbergAStrangPJakobssonM. Next of kin’s experience of powerlessness and helplessness in palliative home care. Support Care Cancer2004; 12(2): 120–128.
10.
MilbergAStrangP. What to do when ‘there is nothing more to do’? A study within a salutogenic framework of family members’ experience of palliative home care staff. Psychooncology2007; 751: 741–751.
11.
PhillipsLRReedPG. Into the Abyss of someone else’s dying: the voice of the end-of-life caregiver. Clin Nurs Res2009; 18(1): 80–97.
12.
StajduharKFunkLToyeC. Part 1: home-based family caregiving at the end of life: a comprehensive review of published quantitative research (1998–2008). Palliat Med2010; 24(6): 573–593.
13.
FunkLStajduharKToyeC. Part 2: home-based family caregiving at the end of life: a comprehensive review of published qualitative research (1998–2008). Palliat Med2010; 24(6): 594–607.
14.
AndershedB. Relatives in end-of-life care – part 1: a systematic review of the literature the five last years. J Clin Nurs2006; 15(9): 1158–1169.
15.
MunckBFridlundBMårtenssonJ. Next-of-kin caregivers in palliative home care – from control to loss of control. J Adv Nurs2008; 64(6): 578–586.
16.
FunkLMAllanDEStajduharKI. Palliative family caregivers’ accounts of health care experiences: the importance of ‘security’. Palliat Support Care2009; 7(4): 435–447.
17.
MilbergAWahlbergRJakobssonM. What is a ‘secure base’ when death is approaching? A study applying attachment theory to adult patients’ and family member’s experiences of palliative home care. Psychooncology2012; 21(8): 886–895.
18.
NeuenschwanderHBrueraECavalliF. Matching the clinical function and symptom status with the expectations of patients with advanced cancer, their families, and health care workers. Support Care Cancer1997; 5(3): 252–256.
19.
ParkCLFolkmanS. Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Rev Gen Psychol1997; 1(2): 115–144.
20.
YalomID. Existential psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books, 1980.
21.
DowneyLCurtisJRLaffertyWE. The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD): empirical domains and theoretical perspectives. J Pain Symptom Manage2010; 39(1): 9–22.
22.
Melin-JohanssonCHenochIStrangS. Living in the presence of death: an integrative literature review of relatives’ important existential concerns when caring for a severely ill family member. Open Nurs J2012; 6: 1–12.
23.
BeePEBarnesPLukerKA. A systematic review of informal caregivers’ needs in providing home-based end-of-life care to people with cancer. J Clin Nurs2009; 18(10): 1379–1393.
24.
AlbinssonLStrangP. Existential concerns of families of late-stage dementia patients: questions of freedom, choices, isolation, death, and meaning. J Palliat Med2004; 6(2): 225–235.
25.
MilbergAStrangP. Meaningfulness in palliative home care: an interview study of dying cancer patients’ next of kin. Palliat Support Care2003; 1(2): 171–180.
26.
WongWKTUssherJ. Bereaved informal cancer carers making sense of their palliative care experiences at home. Health Soc Care Community2009; 17(3): 274–282.
RitchieJSpencerLO’ConnorW. Carrying out qualitative analysis. In: RitchieJLewisJ (eds) Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE, 2003, pp. 219–262.
29.
PistrangNBarkerC. Varieties of qualitative research: a pragmatic approach to selecting methods. In: CooperH (ed.) APA handbook of research methods in psychology: research designs, vol. 2. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2012, pp. 5–18.
30.
SandelowskiM. Theory unmasked: the uses and guises of theory in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health1993; 16(3): 213–218.
31.
FlickU. An introduction to qualitative research. 4th ed.London: SAGE, 2009.
32.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006; 3(2): 77–101.
33.
ElliottRFischerCTRennieDL. Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. Br J Clin Psychol1999; 38(Pt 3): 215–229.
34.
ParkerI. Criteria for qualitative research in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2004; 1: 1–12.
TuffordLNewmanP. Bracketing in qualitative research. Qual Soc Work2010; 11(1): 80–96.
37.
FischerCT. Bracketing in qualitative research: conceptual and practical matters. Psychother Res2009; 19(4–5): 583–590.
38.
AhernKJ. Ten tips for reflexive bracketing. Qual Health Res1999; 9(3): 407–411.
39.
CarlanderISahlberg-BlomEHellströmI. The modified self: family caregivers’ experiences of caring for a dying family member at home. J Clin Nurs2011; 20(7–8): 1097–1105.
40.
SandLStrangP. Existential loneliness in a palliative home care setting. J Palliat Med2006; 9(6): 1376–1387.
41.
FranklV.Man’s Search for Meaning. (LaschI., Trans.) Boston: Beacon Press, 1963 (Original Work Published 1946).
42.
WongWKTUssherJPerzJ. Strength through adversity: bereaved cancer carers’ accounts of rewards and personal growth from caring. Palliat Support Care2009; 7(2): 187–196.
43.
DavisCGNolen-HoeksemaSLarsonJ. Making sense of loss and benefiting from the experience: two construals of meaning. J Pers Soc Psychol1998; 75(2): 561–574.
44.
SteinhauserKEClippECMcNeillyM. In search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann Intern Med2000; 132(10): 825–832.
45.
FarberSJEgnewTRHerman-bertschJL. Issues in end-of-life care: patient, caregiver, and clinician perspectives. J Palliat Med2003; 6: 19–31.
46.
TenoJMCaseyVAWelchLC. Medical care: views of the guidelines and bereaved family members. J Pain Symptom Manage2001; 22(3): 738–751.
47.
Addington-HallJMcPhersonC. After-death interviews with surrogates/bereaved family members: some issues of validity. J Pain Symptom Manage2001; 22(3): 784–790.
48.
FunkLMStajduharKIRobin CohenS. Legitimising and rationalising in talk about satisfaction with formal healthcare among bereaved family members. Sociol Health Illn2012; 34(7): 1010–1024.
