Should palliative care patients’ hope be truthful,helpful or valuable? An interpretative synthesis of literature describing healthcare professionals’ perspectives on hope of palliative care patients
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2014
Should palliative care patients’ hope be truthful,helpful or valuable? An interpretative synthesis of literature describing healthcare professionals’ perspectives on hope of palliative care patients
Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on palliative care patients’ hope influence communication. However, these perspectives have hardly been examined.
Aim:
To describe healthcare professionals’ perspectives on palliative care patients’ hope found in the literature.
Design:
The interpretative synthesis consisted of a quality assessment and thematic analysis of included articles.
Data sources:
Literature search of articles between January 1980 and July 2011 in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EMBASE and references of included studies. Search strategy: (palliat* or hospice or terminal* in title/abstract or as subject heading) AND (hope* or hoping or desir* or optimis* in title or as subject heading).
Results:
Of the 37 articles, 31 articles were of sufficient quality. The majority of these 31 articles described perspectives of nurses or physicians. Three perspectives on hope of palliative care patients were found: (1) realistic perspective – hope as an expectation should be truthful, and healthcare professionals focused on adjusting hope to truth, (2) functional perspective – hope as coping mechanism should help patients, and professionals focused on fostering hope, and (3) narrative perspective – hope as meaning should be valuable for patients, and healthcare professionals focused on interpreting it.
Conclusions:
Healthcare professionals who are able to work with three perspectives on hope may improve their communication with their palliative care patients, which leads to a better quality of care.
LinHBauer-WuSM. Psycho-spiritual well-being in patients with advanced cancer: an integrative review of the literature. J Adv Nurs2003; 44: 69–80.
2.
EdwardsAPangNShiuV. The understanding of spirituality and the potential role of spiritual care in end-of-life and palliative care: a meta-study of qualitative research. Palliat Med2010; 24: 753–770.
3.
KylmäJDugglebyWCooperD. Hope in palliative care: an integrative review. Palliat Support Care2009; 7: 365–377.
4.
DugglebyW. Hope at the end of life. J Hosp Palliat Nurs2001; 3: 51–64.
5.
JohnsonS. Hope in terminal illness: an evolutionary concept analysis. Int J Palliat Nurs2007; 13: 451–459.
6.
SinclairSPereiraJRaffinS. A thematic review of the spirituality literature within palliative care. J Palliat Med2006; 9: 464–479.
7.
ClaytonJMHancockKParkerS. Sustaining hope when communicating with terminally ill patients and their families: a systematic review. Psychooncology2008; 17: 641–659.
8.
EliottJAOlverIN. Hope and hoping in the talk of dying cancer patients. Soc Sci Med2007; 64: 138–149.
9.
PenzK. Theories of hope: are they relevant for palliative care nurses and their practice?Int J Palliat Nurs2008; 14: 408–412.
10.
BoydKMasonBKendallM. Advance care planning for cancer patients in primary care: a feasibility study. Br J Gen Pract2010; 60: e449–e458.
11.
BuitingHMRurupMLWijsbekH. Understanding provision of chemotherapy to patients with end stage cancer: qualitative interview study. BMJ Support Palliat Care2011; 1: 33–41.
12.
PfeiferMPSidorovJESmithAC. The discussion of end-of-life medical care by primary care patients and physicians: a multicenter study using structured qualitative interviews. The EOL Study Group. J Gen Intern Med1994; 9: 82–88.
13.
Schulman-GreenDMcCorkleRCherlinE. Nurses’ communication of prognosis and implications for hospice referral: a study of nurses caring for terminally ill hospitalized patients. Am J Crit Care2005; 14: 64–70.
14.
ThorneSOliffeJKim-SingC. Helpful communications during the diagnostic period: an interpretive description of patient preferences. Eur J Cancer Care2010; 19: 746–754.
MalterudK. The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers. Lancet2001; 358: 397–400.
17.
Dixon-WoodsMAgarwalSJonesD. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy2005; 10: 45–53.
18.
EliottJ. What have we done with hope? A brief history. In: EliottJ (ed.) Interdisciplinary perspectives on hope. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2005, pp. 3–45.
19.
MacLeodRCarterH. Health professionals’ perception of hope: understanding its significance in the care of people who are dying. Mortality1999; 4: 309–317.
20.
MurraySAKendallMBoydK. Illness trajectories and palliative care. BMJ2005; 330: 1007–1011.
21.
AnnunziataMATalaminiRTumoloS. Physicians and death: comments and behaviour of 605 doctors in the north-east of Italy. Support Care Cancer1996; 4: 334–340.
22.
BaileWFLenziRParkerPA. Oncologists’ attitudes toward and practices in giving bad news: an exploratory study. J Clin Oncol2002; 20: 2189–2196.
23.
BenzeinESavemanB. Nurses’ perception of hope in patients with cancer: a palliative care perspective. Cancer Nurs1998; 21: 10–16.
24.
BoroujeniAZMohammadiROskouieSFH. Iranian nurses’ preparation for loss: finding a balance in end-of-life care. J Clin Nurs2009; 18: 2329–2336.
25.
BrowallMMelin-JohanssonCStrangS. Health care staff’s opinions about existential issues among patients with cancer. Palliat Support Care2010; 8: 59–68.
26.
CarterHMcKennaCMacLeodR. Health professionals’ responses to multiple sclerosis and motor neurone disease. Palliat Med1998; 12: 383–394.
27.
ClaytonJMButowPNArnoldRM. Fostering coping and nurturing hope when discussing the future with terminally ill cancer patients and their caregivers. Cancer2005; 103: 1965–1975.
28.
CutcliffeJR. How do nurses inspire and instill hope in terminally ill HIV patients?J Adv Nurs1995; 22: 888–895.
29.
Delvecchio GoodMJGoodBJSchafferC. American oncology and the discourse on hope. Cult Med Psychiatry1990; 14: 59–79.
30.
DugglebyWHoltslanderLSteevesM. Discursive meaning of hope for older persons with advanced cancer and their caregivers. Can J Aging2010; 29: 361–367.
31.
FadulNElsayemAPalmerJL. Supportive versus palliative care: what’s in a name?Cancer2009; 115: 2013–2021.
32.
FenwickPLovelaceHBrayneS. Comfort for the dying: five year retrospective and one year prospective studies of end of life experiences. Arch Gerontol Geriatr2010; 51: 173–179.
33.
GordonEJDaughertyCK. ‘Hitting you over the head’: oncologists’ disclosure of prognosis to advanced cancer patients. Bioethics2003; 17: 142–168.
34.
HerthK. Engendering hope in the chronically and terminally ill: nursing interventions. Am J Hosp Palliat Care1995; 12: 31–39.
35.
HiraiKMiyashitaMMoritaT. Good death in Japanese cancer care: a qualitative study. J Pain Symptom Manage2006; 31: 140–147.
36.
HuntM. ‘Scripts’ for dying at home – displayed in nurses’, patients’ and relatives’ talk. J Adv Nurs1992; 17: 1297–1302.
37.
KiernerKAGartnerVBartschR. Attitudes towards palliative care in primary metastatic cancer: a survey among oncologists. Wien Klin Wochenschr2010; 122: 45–49.
38.
MahlunguluSNUysLR. Spirituality in nursing: an analysis of the concept. Curationis2004; 27: 15–26.
39.
MaxwellTLPassowESPlumbJ. Experience with hospice: reflections from third-year medical students. J Palliat Med2002; 5: 721–727.
40.
McCahillLEKrouseRSChuDZ. Decision making in palliative surgery. J Am Coll Surg2002; 195: 411–422.
41.
MiyajiNT. The power of compassion: truth-telling among American doctors in the care of dying patients. Soc Sci Med1993; 36: 249–264.
42.
MokELauKLamW. Health-care professionals’ perspective on hope in the palliative care setting. J Palliat Med2010; 13: 877–883.
43.
MokELauKPLamWM. Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of existential distress in patients with advanced cancer. J Adv Nurs2010; 66: 1510–1522.
44.
NolanS. Hope beyond (redundant) hope: how chaplains work with dying patients. Palliat Med2011; 25: 21–25.
45.
NortonSATalericoKA. Facilitating end-of-life decision-making: strategies for communicating and assessing. J Gerontol Nurs2000; 26: 6–13.
46.
OwenDC. Nurses’ perspectives on the meaning of hope in patients with cancer: a qualitative study. Oncol Nurs Forum1989; 16: 75–79.
47.
PangM-C. Protective truthfulness: the Chinese way of safeguarding patients in informed treatment decisions. J Med Ethics1999; 25: 247–253.
48.
PerakylaA. Hope work in the care of seriously ill patients. Qual Health Res1991; 1: 407–433.
49.
ReinkeLFShannonSEEngelbergRA. Supporting hope and prognostic information: nurses’ perspectives on their role when patients have life-limiting prognoses. J Pain Symptom Manage2010; 39: 982–992.
50.
RittmanMPaigePRiveraJ. Phenomenological study of nurses caring for dying patients. Cancer Nurs1997; 20: 115–119.
TheAMHakTKoëterG. Collusion in doctor-patient communication about imminent death: an ethnographic study. BMJ2000; 321: 1376–1381.
53.
ThulesiusHHakanssonAPeterssonK. Balancing: a basic process in end-of-life cancer care. Qual Health Res2003; 13: 1353–1377.
54.
ElliottRFischerCTRennieDL. Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. Br J Clin Psychol1999; 38: 215–229.
55.
MalterudK. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet2001; 358: 483–488.
56.
TongASainsburyPCraigJ. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care2007; 19: 349–357.
57.
O’CathainAMurphyENichollJ. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy2008; 13: 92–98.
58.
KelleyKClarkBBrownV. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care2003; 15: 261–266.
59.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006; 3: 77–101.
60.
FisherWR. Narration as a human communication paradigm: the case of public moral argument. Commun Monogr1984; 51: 1–22.
61.
FisherWR. The narrative paradigm: in the beginning. J Commun1985; 35: 73–89.
62.
HarterLMPhyllisMJBeckCS (eds) Narratives, health, and healing: communication theory, research, and practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005.
63.
LesterAD. Hope in pastoral care and counseling. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1995.
64.
MattinglyC. The paradox of hope: journeys through a clinical borderland. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2010.
65.
OlverIN. Bioethical implications of hope. In: EliottJ (ed.) Interdisciplinary perspectives on hope. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2005, pp. 241–256.
66.
Finfgeld-ConnettD. Generalizability and transferability of meta-synthesis research findings. J Adv Nurs2010; 66: 246–254.
67.
NekolaichukCLBrueraE. On the nature of hope in palliative care. J Palliat Care1998; 14: 36–42.
68.
SlortWSchweitzerBBlankensteinA. Perceived barriers and facilitators for general practitioner–patient communication in palliative care: a systematic review. Palliat Med2011; 25: 613–629.
69.
BrownRFButowPNHenmanM. Responding to the active and passive patient: flexibility is the key. Health Expect2002; 5: 236–245.
70.
EgglySPennerLAlbrechtTL. Discussing bad news in the outpatient oncology clinic: rethinking current communication guidelines. J Clin Oncol2006; 24: 716–719.
71.
MeierDEBackALMorrisonRS. The inner life of physicians and care of the seriously ill. JAMA2001; 286: 3007–3014.
72.
FriedrichsenMMilbergA. Concerns about losing, control when breaking bad news of terminally ill patients with cancer: physicians’ perspective. J Palliat Med2006; 9: 673–682.
73.
De GravesSArandaS. When a child cannot be cured – reflections of health professionals. Eur J Cancer Care2005; 14: 132–140.
74.
Keene RederEASerwintJR. Until the last breath: exploring the concept of hope for parents and health care professionals during a child’s serious illness. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med2009; 163: 653–657.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
