Background: there is increasing interest in combining qualitative and quantitative research methods to provide comprehensiveness and greater knowledge yield. Mixed methods are valuable in the development and evaluation of complex interventions. They are therefore particularly valuable in palliative care research where the majority of interventions are complex, and the identification of outcomes particularly challenging.
Aims: this paper aims to introduce the role of mixed methods in the development and evaluation of complex interventions in palliative care, and how they may be used in palliative care research.
Content: the paper defines mixed methods and outlines why and how mixed methods are used to develop and evaluate complex interventions, with a pragmatic focus on design and data collection issues and data analysis. Useful texts are signposted and illustrative examples provided of mixed method studies in palliative care, including a detailed worked example of the development and evaluation of a complex intervention in palliative care for breathlessness. Key challenges to conducting mixed methods in palliative care research are identified in relation to data collection, data integration in analysis, costs and dissemination and how these might be addressed.
Conclusions: the development and evaluation of complex interventions in palliative care benefit from the application of mixed methods. Mixed methods enable better understanding of whether and how an intervention works (or does not work) and inform the design of subsequent studies. However, they can be challenging: mixed method studies in palliative care will benefit from working with agreed protocols, multidisciplinary teams and engaging staff with appropriate skill sets.
O’CathainAMurphyENichollJ. Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res2007; 7: 85.
3.
BarbourRS. The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health and services research. J Health Serv Res Policy1999; 4: 39–43.
RidenourCSNewmanI. Mixed methods research: exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 2008.
13.
AndrewSHalcombeEJ. Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
14.
TeddlieCTashakkoriA. Foundations of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioural sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2009.
TashakkoriATeddlieC. Sage handbook of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioural sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2010.
17.
SandelowskiM. Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Res Nurs Health2000; 23: 246–255.
18.
BrannenJ. Mixed methods research: a discussion paper. NCRM Methods Review Papers, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, December2005.
19.
BrymanA. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done?Qual Res2006; 6: 97–113.
20.
MasonJ. Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qual Res2006; 6: 9–25.
21.
Moran-EllisJAlexanderVDCroninA. Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications. Qual Res2006; 6: 45–59.
22.
BrymanA. Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. J Mixed Methods Res2007; 1: 8–22.
23.
O’CathainAMurphyENichollJ. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy2008; 13: 92–98.
24.
ÖstlundUKiddLWengstro¨mY. Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: a methodological review. Int J Nurs Stud2011; 48: 369–383.
25.
PatersonCBaartsCLaunsøL. Evaluating complex health interventions: a critical analysis of the ‘outcomes’. BMC Compl Alternative Med2009; 9: 18.
26.
CawleyDWatermanDRobertsD. A qualitative study exploring perceptions and experiences of patients and clinicians of Palliative Medicine Outpatient Clinics in different settings. Palliat Med2011; 25: 52–61.
27.
CollinsKMTO’CathainA. Ten points about mixed methods research to be considered by the novice researcher. Int J Multiple Res Approaches2009; 3: 2–7.
28.
EwingGFarquharMBoothS. Delivering palliative care in an acute hospital setting; views of referrers and specialist providers. J Pain Symptom Manage2009; 38: 327–340.
29.
OnwuegbuzieAJTeddlieC. A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In: TashakkoriATeddlieC (eds) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003, pp.351–383.
30.
SampsonELThune´-BoyleIKukkastenvehmasR. Palliative care in advanced dementia: a mixed methods approach for the development of a complex intervention. BMC Palliat Care2008; 7: 8.
31.
SeersKGaleNPatersonC. Individualised and complex experiences of integrative cancer support care: combining qualitative and quantitative data. Support Care Canc2009; 17: 1159–1167.
32.
ShipmanCBurtJReamE. Improving district nurses’ confidence and knowledge in the principles and practice of palliative care. J Adv Nurs2008; 63(5): 494–505.
33.
Vale-TaylorP. “We will remember them”: a mixed-method study to explore which post-funeral remembrance activities are most significant and important to bereaved people living with loss, and why those activities are chosen. Palliat Med2009; 537–544.
34.
BoothSSilvesterSToddC. Breathlessness in cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: using a qualitative approach to describe the experience of patients and carers. Palliat Support Care2003; 1: 337–344.
35.
BoothSMoffatCFarquharM. Developing a breathlessness service for patients with palliative and supportive care needs, irrespective of diagnosis. J Palliat Care2011; 27: 28–36.
36.
BoothSFarquharMGyselsM. The impact of a breathlessness intervention service (BIS) on the lives of patients with intractable dyspnoea: a qualitative Phase I study. J Palliat Support Care2006; 4: 287–293.
37.
GrandeGEToddCJ. Why are trials in palliative care so difficult?Palliat Med2000; 14: 69–74.
38.
FlemmingKAdamsonJAtkinK. Improving the effectiveness of interventions in palliative care: the potential of qualitative research in enhancing evidence from randomized controlled trials. Palliat Med2008; 22: 123–131.
39.
FarquharMHigginsonIJFaganP. The feasibility of a single-blinded fast-track pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention for breathlessness in advanced disease. BMC Palliat Care2009; 8: 9.
40.
FarquharMEwingGHigginsonIJ. The experience of using the SEIQoL-DW with patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: issues of process and outcome. Qual Life Res2010; 19: 619–629.
41.
FarquharMHigginsonIJFaganP. Results of a pilot investigation into a complex intervention for breathlessness in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Palliat Support Care2010; 8: 143–149.
42.
FarquharMPrevostATMcCroneP. Study protocol: Phase III single-blinded fast-track pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention for breathlessness in advanced disease. Trials2011; 12: 130.
43.
LewinSGlentonCOxmanAD. Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. Br Med J2009; 339: b3496.
44.
O’CathainAMurphyENichollJ. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. Br Med J2010; 341: 1147–1150.
45.
ProtheroeJBowerPChew-GrahamC. The use of mixed methodology in evaluating complex interventions: identifying patient factors that moderate the effect of a decision aid. Family Pract2007; 24: 594–600.
46.
MoffattSWhiteMMackintoshJ. Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research – what happens when mixed method findings conflict?BMC Health Serv Res2006; 628.
47.
O’CathainAMurphyENichollJ. Multi-disciplinary, interdisciplinary, or dysfunctional? Team working in mixed-methods research. Qual Health Res2008; 18: 1574–1585.
DahlbergBWittinkMNGalloJJ. Funding and publishing integrated studies: writing effective mixed methods manuscripts and grant proposals. In: TashakkoriATeddlieC (eds) Sage handbook of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioural sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2010.
51.
LeechNLOnwuegbuzieAJCombsJP. Writing publishable mixed methods research articles: guidelines for emerging scholars in the health sciences and beyond. Int J Multiple Res Approaches2011; 5: 7–24.
