Health system characteristics of quality care delivery: A comparative case study examination of palliative care for cancer patients in four regions in Ontario,Canada
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2012
Health system characteristics of quality care delivery: A comparative case study examination of palliative care for cancer patients in four regions in Ontario,Canada
Background: A number of palliative care delivery models have been proposed to address the structural and process gaps in this care. However, the specific elements required to form competent systems are often vaguely described.
Aim: The purpose of this study was to explore whether a set of modifiable health system factors could be identified that are associated with population palliative care outcomes, including less acute care use and more home deaths.
Design: A comparative case study evaluation was conducted of ‘palliative care’ in four health regions in Ontario, Canada. Regions were selected as exemplars of high and low acute care utilization patterns, representing both urban and rural settings. A theory-based approach to data collection was taken using the System Competency Model, comprised of structural features known to be essential indicators of palliative care system performance. Key informants in each region completed study instruments. Data were summarized using qualitative techniques and an exploratory factor pattern analysis was completed.
Results: 43 participants (10+ from each region) were recruited, representing clinical and administrative perspectives. Pattern analysis revealed six factors that discriminated between regions: overall palliative care planning and needs assessment; a common chart; standardized patient assessments; 24/7 palliative care team access; advanced practice nursing presence; and designated roles for the provision of palliative care services.
Conclusions: The four palliative care regional ‘systems’ examined using our model were found to be in different stages of development. This research further informs health system planners on important features to incorporate into evolving palliative care systems.
Cancer Care Ontario. Improving the quality of palliative care services for cancer patients in Ontario. Toronto: ON, 2006.
2.
HanksGCherneyNChristakisNFallonMKaasaSPortenoyR. Oxford textbook of palliative medicine. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
3.
Institute of Medicine and National Research Council of the National Academies. Improving palliative care for cancer. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2001.
4.
World Health Organization. Better palliative care for older people. Denmark: WHO, 2004.
5.
KaasaSHjermstadMJLogeJH. Methodological and structural challenges in palliative care research: how have we fared in the last decades?Palliat Med. 2006; 20: 727–734.
6.
BarberaLSussmanSViolaR. Factors associated with end-of-life health service use in patients dying of cancer. Healthcare Policy. 2010; 5: e125–e143.
7.
EarleCCParkERLaiBWeeksJCAyanianJZBlockS. Identifying potential indicators of the quality of end-of-life cancer care from administrative data. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 1133–1138.
8.
EarleCCNevilleBALandrumMB. Evaluating claims-based indicators of the intensity of end-of-life cancer care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005; 17: 505–509.
9.
GrunfeldELethbridgeLDewarR. Towards using administrative databases to measure population-based indicators of quality of end-of-life care: Testing the methodology. Palliat Med. 2006; 20: 769–777.
10.
BarberaLPaszatLChartierC. Indicators of poor quality end-of-life cancer care in Ontario. J Palliat Care. 2006; 22: 12–17.
11.
ForemanLMHuntRWLukeCGRoderDM. Factors predictive of preferred place of death in the general population of South Australia. Palliat Med. 2006; 20: 447–453.
12.
WilsonDMTrumanCDThomasR. The rapidly changing location of death in Canada, 1994-2004. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68: 1752–1758.
13.
MacAdamM. Frameworks of integrated care for the elderly: a systematic review. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks, 2008.
14.
Palliative Care Network Northwest. Hospice palliative care Northwest: the vision. 2001. Thunder Bay: Palliative Care Network Northwest, 2010.
15.
AlterCHageJ. Organizations working together. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1993.
16.
ShortellSGilliesRAndersonDEricksonKMitchellJ. Remaking health care in America, 2nd ed.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
17.
DudgeonDVaitonisVSeowHKingSAngusHSawkaC. Ontario, Canada: Using networks to integrate palliative care province-wide. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007; 33: 640–644.
18.
Ontario Ministry of Health. Palliative care initiatives for Ontario: a partnership for caring. Toronto: Queen’s Park, 1993.
PattonM. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.
21.
BainbridgeDBrazilKKruegerPPloegJTaniguchiA. A proposed systems approach to the evaluation of integrated palliative care. BMC Palliat Care. 2010; 9: 8.
22.
BarazzettiGBorreaniCMiccinesiGToscaniF. What ‘‘best practice’’ could be in palliative care: an analysis of statements on practice and ethics expressed by the main health organizations. BMC Palliat Care. 2010; 9: 1.
23.
AdlerMZiglioE. Gazing into the oracle: the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Kingsley Publishers, 1996.
HenryG. Practical sampling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2010.
27.
BrazilKWhelanTO’BrienMASussmanJPyetteNBainbridgeD. Towards improving the co-ordination of supportive cancer care services in the community. Health Pol. 2004; 70: 125–131.
28.
BrazilKBainbridgeDSussmanJWhelanTO’BrienMAPyetteN. Providing supportive care to cancer patients: a study on inter-organizational relationships. Int J Integr Care. 2008; 8: e01.
CreswellJ. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1999.
33.
IwakabeSGazzolaN. From single-case studies to practice-based knowledge: aggregating and synthesizing case studies. Psychother Res. 2009; 19: 601–611.
34.
TrochimW. Outcome pattern matching and program theory. Eval Program Plann. 2011; 12: 355–366.
35.
CarstairsS. Still not there. Quality end-of-life care: a progress report. Ottawa: Senate of Canada, 2005.
36.
U.S. Department of State Department of Health and Human Services National Institute on Aging. Why population aging matters: a global perspective. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, 2007.
37.
BakitasMALyonsKDDixonJAhlesTA. Palliative care program effectiveness research: Developing rigor in sampling design, conduct, and reporting. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006; 31: 270–284.
38.
KrouseRSRosenfeldKEGrantM. Palliative care research: issues and opportunities. Canc Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004; 13: 337–339.
Nikbakht-Van de SandeCVvan der RijtCCVisserAPten VoordeMAPruynJF. Function of local networks in palliative care: a Dutch view. J Palliat Med. 2005; 8: 808–816.
41.
MorrisonRS. Palliative care outcomes research: the next steps. J Palliat Med. 2005; 8: 13–16.
42.
CritchleyPJadadARTaniguchiA. Are some palliative care delivery systems more effective and efficient than others? A systematic review of comparative studies. J Palliat Care. 1999; 15: 40–47.
43.
HearnJHigginsonIJ. Do specialist palliative care teams improve outcomes for cancer patients? A systematic literature review. Palliat Med. 1998; 12: 317–332.
44.
HigginsonIJFinlayIGGoodwinDM. Is there evidence that palliative care teams alter end-of-life experiences of patients and their caregivers?J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003; 25: 150–168.
45.
LorenzKALynnJDySM. Evidence for improving palliative care at the end of life: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 148: 147–159.
46.
ZimmermannCRiechelmannRKrzyzanowskaMRodinGTannockI. Effectiveness of specialized palliative care: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc. 2008; 299: 1698–1709.
47.
GomesBHigginsonIJ. Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer: systematic review. Br Med J. 2006; 332: 515–521.
48.
BrumleyREnguidanosSJamisonP. Increased satisfaction with care and lower costs: Results of a randomized trial of in-home palliative care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007; 55: 993–1000.
49.
MorrisonRSPenrodJDCasselJB. Cost savings associated with US hospital palliative care consultation programs. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168: 1783–1790.
50.
TemelJSGreerJAMuzikanskyA. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. New Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 733–742.
BainbridgeDBrazilKDKruegerP. Evaluating program integration and the rise in collaboration: A case study of a palliative care network. J Palliat Care. 2011; 27 (in press).
