Few opportunities exist outside the home for children and teenagers with life-limiting conditions to have a break in a setting specifically designed and adequately staffed and resourced to meet their complex clinical, practical and emotional needs; until recently provision focused primarily on providing respite for parents/carers. Based on policy recommendations, a short-break service was established with the aim of working in partnership with families and voluntary and statutory agencies to provide a fun break for children and teenagers with life-limiting conditions and complement the range of services available. This qualitative study used interviews and focus groups to determine teenagers’ and parents’ views of the service. Three themes emerged: accessibility and communication; needs and boundaries; and shaping the service. Teenagers enjoyed regular planned residential breaks, access to skilled staff and bespoke facilities to support their needs, opportunities to meet others with life-limiting conditions and fun time away from home, thereby giving parents peace of mind, a regular planned break from care-giving, opportunities to meet other parents and to spend exclusive time with their other children. If specialist short-break services become part of the national range of services available, children and teenagers with life-limiting conditions and their parents and siblings could all benefit.
SouterJBondSCraftA. Families of misfortune. Newcastle upon Tyne: Department of Child Health and Centre for Health Services Research, Newcastle University, 1995.
2.
DoH. Inspecting for quality: guidance on standards for short-term breaks: a handbook for social workers and inspectors, users and carers. London: Department of Health, 1993.
3.
SteeleRDaviesB. Impact on parents when a child has a progressive, life-threatening illness. Int J Palliat Nurs2006; 12: 576–585.
4.
CarlinJCramerH. Creative responses to changing needs?Fourth national survey of short break services for disabled children in the UK. York: Shared Care Network, 2007.
5.
DfES/HMT. Aiming high for disabled children; better support for families. London: Department for Education & Schools/HM treasury, 2007.
6.
DCSF/DH. Aiming high for disabled children: short breaks implementation guidance. London: Department for Education & Schools/Department of Health, 2008.
7.
ACH. Children’s hospice services throughout the UK. Bristol: Association of Children’s Hospices, 2006.
8.
EmondAEatonN. Supporting children with complex health care needs and their families - an overview of the research agenda. Child Care Health Dev2004; 30: 195–199.
9.
EatonN. ‘I don’t know how we coped before’: a study of respite care for children in the home and while we were conducting this study hospice. J Clin Nurs2008; 17: 3196–3204.
10.
DoH/DfES. Every child matters-national service framework for children, young people and maternity services. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills, 2004.
11.
ACT/RCPCH. A guide to the development of children’s palliative care services, 2nd ed.Bristol: Association for Children with Life-threatening or Terminal Conditions and their Families (ACT) and The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH), 2003.
12.
ACT/RCPCH. A guide to the development of children’s palliative care services, 3rd ed.Bristol: Association for Children with Life-threatening or Terminal Conditions and their Families (ACT) and The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH), 2009.
13.
CraftA. Children with complex health care needs - supporting the child and family in the community. Child Care Health Dev2004; 30: 193–194.
14.
NDT&CDS. An audit of respite and palliative care services in Tyne and Wear for children with complex needs. Newcastle upon Tyne: National Development Team and Council Disabled Service (NDT&CDS), 2001.
15.
RodriguesNPattersonJM. Impact of severity of a child’s chronic condition on the functioning of two-parent families. J Pediatr Psychol2007; 32: 417–426.
16.
SleedMBeechamJKnappMMcAuleyCMcCurryN. Assessing services, supports and costs for young families under stress. Child Care Health Dev2006; 32: 101–110.
17.
DCSF. Parenting & family support: guidance for local authorities in England. London: Department for Children, Schools & Families, 2010.
18.
DOH. Palliative care services for children and young people in England. London: Department of Health, 2007.
19.
RabieePSloperPBeresfordB. Desired outcomes for children and young people with complex care needs, and children who do not use speech for communication. Health Soc Care Community2005; 13: 478–487.
20.
DOH. Better care: better lives: improving the outcomes and experiences for children and young people and their families with life –limiting and life threatening conditions. London: Department of Health, 2008.
21.
RobinsonCJacksonPTownsleyR. Short breaks for families caring for a disabled child with complex health needs. Child Fam Soc Work2001; 6: 67–75.
22.
MacDonaldHCalleryP. Different meanings of respite: a study of parents, nurses and social workers caring for children with complex needs. Child Care Health Dev2004; 30: 279–288.
23.
MitchellWSloperP. Information that informs rather than alienates families with disabled children: developing a model of good practice. Health Soc Care Community2002; 10: 74–81.
24.
MitchellWSloperP. User-friendly information for families with disabled children: a guide to good practice. York: York Publishing Services, 2000.
25.
MitchellWSloperP. Quality in services for disabled children and their families: what can theory, policy and research on children’s and parents’ views tell us?Child Soc2001; 15: 237–252.
26.
RCPCH. A Guide to the participation of children and young people in health services. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, 2010.
27.
GreenJThorogoodN. Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage, 2004.
28.
SwallowVCoadJMacfadyenA. Involving children, young people and parents in knowledge generation in health and social care research. In: NolanMHansonEGrantGKeadyJ (eds) User participation research in health and social care. Buckingham: OU Press, 2007.
29.
RCPCH. RCP (Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health) Ethics Advisory Committee. Arch Dis Child2000; 82: 177–182.
30.
AllmarkP. The ethics of research with children. Nurse Researcher2002; 10: 7–19.
31.
AldersonP. Designing ethical research with children. In: FarrellA (ed.) Ethical research with children. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2005.
32.
UN. United Nations convention on the rights of the child. New York: United Nations, 1989.
33.
WrightBAldridgeJWurrKSloperTTomlinsonHMillerM. Clinical dilemmas in children with life-limiting illnesses: decision making and the law. Palliat Med2009; 23: 238–247.
34.
GreenJThorogoodN. In-depth interviews. In: GreenJThorogoodN (eds) Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage, 2004.
35.
GibsonF. Conducting focus groups with children and young people: strategies for success. J Res Nurs2007; 12: 473–483.
36.
SwallowVMacFadyenA. Communication skills in nursing: effective qualitative research tools?Paediatr Nurs2004; 16: 20–23.
37.
RitchieJSpencerL. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: BrymanABurgessRG (eds) Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge, 1994.
38.
RitchieJLewisJ. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage, 2003.
BowlingA. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2002.
41.
SwallowVNewtonJMarshallC. How to manage and display qualitative data using ‘Framework’ and Microsoft Excel. J Clin Nurs2003; 12: 610–612.
42.
FranklinASloperP. Supporting the participation of disabled children and young people in decision making. Child Soc2009; 23: 3–13.
43.
PunchS. Interviewing strategies with young people: the ‘secret box’, stimulus material and task based activities. Child Soc2002; 16: 45–50.
44.
DunstCTrivetteC. Empowerment, effective help-giving practices and family centred care. Paediatr Nurs1996; 22: 334–343.
45.
LawMHannaSKingGHurleyPKingSKertoyM. Factors affecting family-centred service delivery for children with disabilities. Child Care Health Dev2003; 29: 357–366.
46.
RobinsonC. Managing life with a chronic condition: the story of normalisation. Qual Health Res1993; 3: 6–28.
47.
CunninghamCDavisH. Working with parents: frameworks for collaboration. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1985.
48.
DanversLFreshwaterDCheaterFWilsonA. Providing a seamless service for children with life-limiting illness: experiences and recommendations of professional staff at the Diana Princess of Wales Children’s Community Service. J Clin Nurs2003; 12: 351–359.
49.
CorkerMShakespeareT. Disability/postmodernity: embodying disability theory. London and New York: Continuum, 2002.
50.
ThompsonRJGustafsonKE. Adaptation to chronic childhood illness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1996.
51.
LangermanCWorrallE. Ordinary lives - disabled children and their families: a guide for donors and funders. London: New Philanthropy Capital, 2005.
52.
ColemanV. The evolving concept of family-centred care. In: SmithLColemanVBradshawM (eds) Family-centred care. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.
53.
HavermansTEiserC. Siblings of a child with cancer. Child Care Health Dev1994; 20: 309–322.
54.
WilliamsPWilliamsAGraffJHansonSStantonAHafemanC. Interrelationships amongst variables affecting well siblings and mothers of families of children with a chronic illness or disability. J Behav Med2002; 25: 411–424.
55.
CavetJSloperP. Participation of disabled children making decisions about their lives and about service development. Child Soc2004; 18: 278–290.
56.
CYPU. Learning to listen: core principles for the involvement of children and young people. London: Children and Young People’s Unit, Department for Children, Schools & Family, 2001.
