While effective general practitioner (GP)–patient communication is required for the provision of good palliative care, barriers and facilitators for this communication are largely unknown. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for GP–patient communication in palliative care. In a systematic review seven computerized databases were searched to find empirical studies on GP–patient communication in palliative care. Fifteen qualitative studies and seven quantitative questionnaire studies were included. The main perceived barriers were GPs’ lack of availability, and patients’ and GPs’ ambivalence to discuss ‘bad prognosis’. Main perceived facilitators were GPs being available, initiating discussion about several end-of-life issues and anticipating various scenarios. Lack of availability and failure to discuss former mistakes appear to be blind spots of GPs. GPs should be more forthcoming to initiate discussions with palliative care patients about prognosis and end-of-life issues. Empirical studies are needed to investigate the effectiveness of the perceived barriers and facilitators.
Audit Commission. What seems to be the matter? Communication between hospitals and patients. Report No 12. London: NHS, 1993.
2.
FordSFallowfieldLLewisS. Doctor-patient interactions in oncology. Soc Sci Med1996; 42: 1511–1519.
3.
LermanCDalyMWalshWP. Communication between patients with breast cancer and health care providers. Determinants and implications. Cancer1993; 72: 2612–2620.
4.
RazaviDDelvauxNMarchalS. Testing health care professionals' communication skills: the usefulness of highly emotional standardized role-playing sessions with simulators. Psychooncology2000; 9: 293–302.
5.
StewartMA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J1995; 152: 1423–1433.
6.
Turnberg L. Improving communication between doctors and patients. Improving Communication between Doctors and Patients: a report of a working party. London: Royal College of Physicians, 1997.
7.
EgglySSAlbrechtTLKellyK. The role of the clinician in cancer clinical communication. J Health Commun2009; 14: 66–75.
8.
GrandeGEBarclaySIGToddCJ. Difficulty of symptom control and general practitioners' knowledge of patients' symptoms. Palliat Med1997; 11: 399–406.
9.
OsseBHVernooij-DassenMJSchadeEGrolRP. The problems experienced by patients with cancer and their needs for palliative care. Support Care Cancer2005; 13: 722–732.
10.
HancockKClaytonJMParkerSM. Truth-telling in discussing prognosis in advanced life-limiting illnesses: a systematic review. Palliat Med2007; 21: 507–517.
11.
ClaytonJMHancockKParkerS. Sustaining hope when communicating with terminally ill patients and their families: a systematic review. Psychooncology2008; 17: 641–659.
12.
RodinGZimmermannCMayerC. Clinician-patient communication: evidence-based recommendations to guide practice in cancer. Curr Oncol2009; 16: 42–49.
13.
CooperHHedgesL. The handbook of research synthesis1994New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
EggerMDavey SmithGAltmanD. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context2001London: BMJ Books.
15.
PeersmanGOliverSOakleyA. Systematic reviews of effectiveness. In: OliverSPeersmanG (eds) Using research for effective health promotionBuckingham: Open University Press, 2001, 96–108.
16.
PopayJRogersAWilliamsG. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res1998; 8: 341–351.
17.
HawkerSPayneSKerrCHardeyMPowellJ. Appraising the evidence: reviewing disparate data systematically. Qual Health Res2002; 12: 1284–1299.
18.
VermeireEVan RoyenPGriffithsF. The critical appraisal of focus group research articles. Eur J Gen Pract2002; 8: 104–108.
19.
Dixon-WoodsMFitzpatrickRRobertsK. Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems. J Eval Clin Pract2001; 7: 125–133.
20.
Dixon-WoodsMSuttonAShawR. Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. J Health Serv Res Policy2007; 12: 42–47.
21.
OliverSHardenAReesR. Young people and mental health: novel methods for systematic review of research on barriers and facilitators. Health Educ Res2008; 23: 770–790.
22.
Noyes J, Popay J, Pearson A, et al. Qualitative research and Cochrane reviews. In: Higgins JPT and Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 5.0.2 [updated September 2009], http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009.
23.
HardenAGarciaJOliverS. Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health research. J Epidemiol Community Health2004; 58: 794–800.
24.
HardenABruntonGFletcherAOakleyA. Teenage pregnancy and social disadvantage: systematic review integrating controlled trials and qualitative studies. Br Med J2009; 339: b4254–b4254.
25.
GrunfeldELethbridgeLDewarR. Towards using administrative databases to measure population-based indicators of quality of end-of-life care: testing the methodology. Palliat Med2006; 20: 769–777.
26.
BurgessTABrooksbankMBeilbyJJ. Talking to patients about death and dying. Aust Fam Physician2004; 33: 85–86.
27.
DeschepperRVander SticheleRBernheimJL. Communication on end-of-life decisions with patients wishing to die at home: the making of a guideline for GPs in Flanders, Belgium. Br J Gen Pract2006; 56: 14–19.
28.
FreemanWLAlticePBettonHBLincolnJARobbinsCM. Care of the dying patient. J Fam Pract1976; 3: 547–555.
29.
ToddCStillA. General practitioners' strategies and tactics of communication with the terminally ill. Fam Pract1993; 10: 268–276.
30.
HearnJHigginsonIJ. Development and validation of a core outcome measure for palliative care: the palliative care outcome scale. Palliative Care Core Audit Project Advisory Group. Qual Health Care1999; 8: 219–227.
31.
GroenvoldMPetersenMAAaronsonNK. The development of the EORTC QLQ–C15–PAL: a shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. Eur J Cancer2006; 42: 55–64.
32.
MaysNPopeC. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ2000; 320: 50–52.
33.
NormanASislerJHackTHarlosM. Family physicians and cancer care. Palliative care patients' perspective. Can Fam Physician2001; 47: 2009–2016.
34.
OsseBHPVernooij–DassenMJFJSchadeE. Problems to discuss with cancer patients in palliative care: A comprehensive approach. Patient Educ Couns2002; 47: 195–204.
35.
ElkingtonHWhitePHiggsRPettinariCJ. GPs' views of discussions of prognosis in severe COPD. Fam Pract2001; 18: 440–444.
36.
GrootMMVernooij–DassenMJFJVerhagenSCACrulBJPGrolRPTM. Obstacles to the delivery of primary palliative care as perceived by GPs. Palliat Med2007; 21: 697–703.
37.
Van den Brink–MuinenAVerhaakPFBensingJMBahrsODeveugeleMGaskLMeadNLeiva–FernandezFPerezAMesserliVOppizziLPeltenburgM. Communication in general practice: differences between European countries. Fam Pract2003; 20: 478–485.
38.
HobmaSORamPMMuijtjensAMGrol1RPvan der VleutenCP. Setting a standard for performance assessment of doctor patient communication in general practice. Med Educ2004; 38: 1244–1252.
39.
DeveugeleMDereseAde BacquerDvan den Brink–MuinenABensingJde MaeseneerJ. Consultation in general practice: a standard operating procedure?Patient Educ Couns2004; 54: 227–233.
40.
DeschepperRBernheimJLSticheleRV. Truth–telling at the end of life: A pilot study on the perspective of patients and professional caregivers. Patient Educ Couns2008; 71: 52–56.
41.
MichielsEDeschepperRBilsenJMortierFDeliensL. Information disclosure to terminally ill patients and their relatives: self–reported practice of Belgian clinical specialists and general practitioners. Palliat Med2009; 23: 345–353.
42.
Van den MuijsenberghM. Palliatieve zorg: De persoonlijke specialiteit van elke huisarts. Huisarts en Wetenschap2003; 46: 80–85.
43.
Epstein RM, Street RL, Jr. Patient–Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute, 2007, NIH Publication No. 07–6225.
44.
BaileWFLenziRKudelkaAP. Improving physician–patient communication in cancer care: outcome of a workshop for oncologists. J Cancer Educ1997; 12: 166–173.
45.
BaileWFKudelkaAPBealeEA. Communication skills training in oncology. Description and preliminary outcomes of workshops on breaking bad news and managing patient reactions to illness. Cancer1999; 86: 887–897.
46.
FallowfieldLJenkinsVFarewellV. Efficacy of a Cancer Research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet2002; 359: 650–656.
47.
RazaviDDelvauxNMarchalS. The effects of a 24–h psychological training program on attitudes, communication skills and occupational stress in oncology: a randomised study. Eur J Cancer1993; 29A: 1858–1863.
48.
RazaviDDelvauxNMarchalS. Does training increase the use of more emotionally laden words by nurses when talking with cancer patients? A randomised study. Br J Cancer2002; 87: 1–7.
49.
RazaviDMerckaertIMarchalS. How to optimize physicians' communication skills in cancer care: results of a randomized study assessing the usefulness of post training consolidation workshops. J Clin Oncol2003; 21: 3141–3149.
50.
Fellowes D, Wilkinson S, Moore P. Communication skills training for health care professionals working with cancer patients, their families and/or carers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; Art. No.: CD003751. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003751.pub2.
51.
FinsetAEkebergOEideHAspegrenK. Long term benefits of communication skills training for cancer doctors. Psychooncology2003; 12: 686–693.
52.
GyselsMRichardsonAHigginsonIJ. Communication training for health professionals who care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of effectiveness. Support Care Cancer2004; 12: 692–700.
53.
GyselsMRichardsonAHigginsonIJ. Communication training for health professionals who care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of training methods. Support Care Cancer2005; 13: 356–366.
54.
WilkinsonSMLeliopoulouCGamblesMRobertsA. Can intensive three–day programmes improve nurses' communication skills in cancer care?Psychooncology2003; 12: 747–759.
55.
WilkinsonSPerryRBlanchardKLinsellL. Effectiveness of a three–day communication skills course in changing nurses' communication skills with cancer/palliative care patients: a randomised controlled trial. Palliat Med2008; 22: 365–375.
56.
BorgsteedeSDDeliensLGraafland–RiedstraC. Communication about euthanasia in general practice: Opinions and experiences of patients and their general practitioners. Patient Educ Couns2007; 66: 156–161.
57.
ExleyCFieldDJonesLStokesT. Palliative care in the community for cancer and end–stage cardiorespiratory disease: The views of patients, lay–carers and health care professionals. Palliat Med2005; 19: 76–83.
58.
FarberSJEgnewTRHerman–BertschJL. Issues in end–of–life care: family practice faculty perceptions. J Fam Pract1999; 48: 525–530.
FarberSJEgnewTRHerman–BertschJLTaylorTRGuldinGE. Issues in end–of–life care: Patient, caregiver, and clinician perceptions. J Palliat Med2003; 6: 19–31.
61.
FieldD. Special not different: General practitioners' accounts of their care of dying people. Soc Sci Med1998; 46: 1111–1120.
62.
KellyBVargheseFTBurnettP. General practitioners' experiences of the psychological aspects in the care of a dying patient. Palliative Supportive Care2008; 6: 125–131.
63.
MeijlerWJVan HeestFOtterRSleijferDT. Educational needs of general practitioners in palliative care: Outcome of a focus group study. J Cancer Educ2005; 20: 28–33.
64.
MichielsEDeschepperRVan Der KelenG. The role of general practitioners in continuity of care at the end of life: A qualitative study of terminally ill patients and their next of kin. Palliat Med2007; 21: 409–415.
65.
PfeiferMPSidorovJESmithAC. The discussion of end–of–life medical care by primary care patients and physicians: A multicenter study using structured qualitative interviews. J Gen Intern Med1994; 9: 82–88.
66.
SteinmetzDWalshMGabelLLWilliamsPT. Family physicians' involvement with dying patients and their families. Attitudes, difficulties, and strategies. Arch Fam Med1993; 2: 753–760.
67.
BurgeFMcIntyrePKaufmanD. Family Medicine residents' knowledge and attitudes about end–of–life care. J Palliat Care2000; 16: 5–12.
68.
EggermanSDustinD. Death orientation and communication with the terminally ill. Omega (Westport)1985; 16: 255–265.
69.
HigginsonIWadeAMcCarthyM. Palliative care: views of patients and their families. BMJ1990; 301: 277–281.
70.
HolmesSMRabowMWDibbleSL. Screening the soul: Communication regarding spiritual concerns among primary care physicians and seriously ill patients approaching the end of life. Am J Hosp Palliat Care2006; 23: 25–33.
