Purpose: In this literature review we evaluated the feasibility and clinimetric quality of quality-of-life (QoL) measurement instruments suitable for use in palliative care. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review to identify instruments measuring (at least one domain of) QoL. We selected articles that present data on patients receiving palliative care and at least one measurement property. A checklist was used to describe the characteristics of the instruments, and a widely accepted rating list was used to evaluate the clinimetric aspects. Results: 29 instruments were identified and evaluated, most of which were targeted at palliative patients in general. None of the instruments demonstrated satisfactory results for all measurement properties. Fourteen instruments received positive ratings for construct validity. Thirteen instruments were tested for reliability, but only two were tested adequately and had positive results (ICC>0.70). Responsiveness was not tested adequately for any of the instruments. Very few of the studies provided information on the interpretation of the scores. Overall, the MQOL, followed by the QUAL-E and the QODD, received the best ratings for their measurement properties. Conclusions: Many measurement instruments were identified, but most had not yet been adequately evaluated. The evaluation of existing instruments with good content validity should have priority over the development of new instruments.
Jocham HR, Dassen T., Widdershoven G., Halfens R.Quality of life in palliative care cancer patients: a literature review . J Clin Nurs2006; 15: 1188-1195.
2.
Stewart AL, Teno J., Patrick DL, Lynn J.The concept of quality of life of dying persons in the context of health care . J Pain Symptom Manage1999; 17: 93-108.
3.
Bruley DKBeyond reliability and validity: analysis of selected quality-of-life instruments for use in palliative care. J Palliat Med1999; 2: 299-309.
4.
Hearn J., Higginson IJOutcome measures in palliative care for advanced cancer patients: a review . J Public Health Med1997; 19: 193-199.
5.
Jordhoy MS, Inger RG, Helbostad JL, Oldervoll L., Loge JH, Kaasa S.Assessing physical functioning: a systematic review of quality of life measures developed for use in palliative care. Palliat Med2007; 21: 673-682.
6.
Kaasa S., Loge JHQuality-of-life assessment in palliative care. Lancet Oncol2002; 3: 175-182.
7.
Kirkova J., Davis MP, Walsh D., et al. Cancer symptom assessment instruments: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol2006; 24: 1459-1473.
8.
Massaro T., McMillan SCInstruments for assessing quality of life in palliative care settings . Int J Palliat Nurs2000; 6: 429-433.
9.
McMillan SCQuality-of-life assessment in palliative care. Cancer Control1996; 3: 223-229.
10.
Mularski RA , Dy SM, Shugarman LR, et al. A systematic review of measures of end-of-life care and its outcomes. Health Serv Res2007; 42: 1848-1870.
11.
Steinhauser KE , Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M., McIntyre L., Tulsky JAFactors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA2000; 284: 2476-2482.
12.
Steinhauser KE , Voils CI, Clipp EC, Bosworth HB, Christakis NA, Tulsky JA‘‘Are you at peace?’’: one item to probe spiritual concerns at the end of life. Arch Intern Med2006; 166: 101-105.
13.
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol2007; 60: 34-42.
14.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments. BMC Med Res Methodol2006; 6: 2.
15.
Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alonso J., et al. Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria. Clin Ther1996 ; 18: 979-992.
16.
Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DLMeasuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med1993; 118: 622-629.
17.
Kirshner B. , Guyatt G.A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis1985 ; 38: 27-36.
18.
Fayers PM, Hand JHCausal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: an example from quality of life. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc2002; 165: 233-261.
19.
Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Bossuyt PMOn assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res2003; 12: 349-362.
20.
Arraras JI, Kuljanic-Vlasic K., Bjordal K., et al. EORTC QLQ-INFO26: a questionaire to assess information given to cancer patients a preliminary analysis in eight countries. Psycho-Oncology2007; 16: 249-254.
21.
Barresi MJ, Shadbolt B., Byrne D., Stuart-Harris R.The development of the Canberra symptom scorecard: a tool to monitor the physical symptoms of patients with advanced tumours. BMC Cancer2003; 3: 32.
22.
Groenvold M. , Petersen MA, Aaronson NK, et al. The development of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: a shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. Eur J Cancer2006; 42: 55-64.
23.
Hoekstra J. , Bindels PJ, van Duijn NP, Schade E.The symptom monitor. A diary for monitoring physical symptoms for cancer patients in palliative care: feasibility, reliability and compliance. J Pain Symptom Manage2004 ; 27: 24-35.
Lehna C., Seck L., Churches S.Development of an outcome measure to document pain relief for home hospice patients: a collaboration between nursing education and practice. Am J Hosp Palliat Care1998; 15: 343-351.
26.
Mularski RA , Heine CE, Osborne ML, Ganzini L., Curtis JRQuality of dying in the ICU: ratings by family members. Chest2005; 128: 280-287.
27.
Schaafsma J. , Osoba D.The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale re-examined: a cross-validation with the EORTC-C30. Qual Life Res1994; 3: 413-424.
28.
Steel K., Ljunggren G., Topinkova E., et al. The RAI-PC: an assessment instrument for palliative care in all settings. Am J Hosp Palliat Care2003; 20: 211-219.
29.
Cella D.The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung and Lung Cancer Subscale assess quality of life and meaningful symptom improvement in lung cancer. Semin Oncol2004; 31(3 Suppl 9): 11-15.
30.
Cleeland CS , Mendoza TR, Wang XS, et al. Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Cancer2000; 89: 1634-1646.
31.
Gaunthier DM , Froman RDPreferences for care near the end of life: scale development and validation. Res Nurs Health2001; 24: 298-306.
32.
Hollen PJ, Gralla RJ, Liepa AM, Symanowski JT, Rusthoven JJAdapting the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) to mesothelioma: using the LCSS-Meso conceptual model for validation. Cancer2004 ; 101: 587-595.
33.
King M., Jones L., Barnes K., et al. Measuring spiritual belief: development and standardization of a beliefs and values scale. Psychol Med2006; 36: 417-425.
34.
Kruse BG, Heinemann D., Moody L., Beckstead J., Conley CEPsychometric properties of the Serenity Scale. J Hosp Palliat Nurs2005; 7: 337-344.
35.
Schirm V., Sheehan D., Zeller RAPreferences for care near the end of life: instrument validation for clinical practice. Crit Care Nurs Q2008; 31: 24-32.
36.
Beadle GF, Yates PM, Najman JM, et al. Illusions in advanced cancer: the effect of belief systems and attitudes on quality of life. Psycho-Oncology2004; 13: 26-36.
37.
Bjorner JB, Petersen MA, Groenvold M., et al. Use of item response theory to develop a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning scale. Qual Life Res2004; 13: 1683-1697.
38.
Petersen MA , Groenvold M., Aaronson N., et al. Item response theory was used to shorten EORTC QLQ-C30 scales for use in palliative care . J Clin Epidemiol2006; 59: 36-44.
39.
Pratheepawanit N., Salek MS, Finlay IGThe applicability of quality-of-life assessment in palliative care: comparing two quality-of-life measures. Palliat Med1999; 13: 325-334.
40.
Sprangers MA , Cull A., Groenvold M., Bjordal K., Blazeby J., Aaronson NKThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer approach to developing questionnaire modules: an update and overview. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. Qual Life Res1998; 7: 291-300.
41.
Stockler MR , Osoba D., Goodwin P., Corey P., Tannock IFResponsiveness to change in health-related quality of life in a randomized clinical trial: a comparison of the Prostate Cancer Specific Quality of Life Instrument (PROSQOLI) with analogous scales from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and a trial specific module. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. J Clin Epidemiol1998; 51: 137-145.
42.
Higginson IJ , McCarthy M.A comparison of two measures of quality of life: their sensitivity and validity for patients with advanced cancer . Palliat Med1994; 8: 282-290.
43.
Higginson IJ , Donaldson N.Relationship between three palliative care outcome scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes2004; 2: 68.
44.
Lemieux J., Beaton DE, Hogg-Johnson S., Bordeleau LJ, Goodwin PJThree methods for minimally important difference: no relationship was found with the net proportion of patients improving. J Clin Epidemiol2007; 60: 448-455.
45.
Llobera J., Esteva M., Benito E., et al. Quality of life for oncology patients during the terminal period. Validation of the HRCA-QL index. Support Care Cancer2003; 11: 294-303.
46.
Maunsell E. , Allard P., Dorval M., Labbe J.A brief pain diary for ambulatory patients with advanced cancer: acceptability and validity. Cancer2000; 88: 2387-2397.
47.
Miyashita M. , Morita T., Sato K., Hirai K., Shima Y., Uchitomi Y.Good Death Inventory: a measure for evaluating good death from the bereaved family member’s perspective. J Pain Symptom Manage2008; 35: 486-498.
48.
Mystakidou K., Tsilika E., Kouloulias V., et al. The ‘‘Palliative Care Quality of Life Instrument (PQLI)’’ in terminal cancer patients . Health Qual Life Outcomes2004; 2: 8.
49.
Carson MG, Fitch MI, Vachon MLMeasuring patient outcomes in palliative care: a reliability and validity study of the Support Team Assessment Schedule. Palliat Med2000; 14: 25-36.
50.
Casarett D. , Pickard A., Bailey FA, et al. A nationwide VA palliative care quality measure: the family assessment of treatment at the end of life. J Palliat Med2008; 11: 68-75.
51.
Engelberg R. , Downey L., Curtis JRPsychometric characteristics of a quality of communication questionnaire assessing communication about end-of-life care . J Palliat Med2006; 9: 1086-1098.
52.
Higginson IJ , McCarthy M.Validity of the support team assessment schedule: do staffs’ ratings reflect those made by patients or their families?Palliat Med1993; 7: 219-228.
53.
Waldron D., O’Boyle CA, Kearney M., Moriarty M., Carney D.Quality-of-life measurement in advanced cancer: assessing the individual . J Clin Oncol1999; 17: 3603-3611.
54.
Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HCWDevelopment of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res2009; 18(8): 1115-1123.
55.
Guo H., Fine PG, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CSA preliminary study of the utility of the brief hospice inventory . J Pain Symptom Manage2001; 22: 637-648.
56.
Ewing G., Todd C., Rogers M., Barclay S., McCabe J., Martin A.Validation of a symptom measure suitable for use among palliative care patients in the community: CAMPAS-R. J Pain Symptom Manage2004; 27: 287-299.
57.
Kissane DW, Wein S., Love A., Lee XQ, Kee PL, Clarke DMThe Demoralization Scale: a report of its development and preliminary validation . J Palliat Care2004; 20: 269-276.
58.
Kaasa T., Loomis J., Gillis K., Bruera E., Hanson J.The Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool: preliminary development and evaluation for use in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage1997; 13: 10-19.
59.
Kaasa T., Wessel J.The Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool: further development and validation for use in palliative care. J Palliat Care2001; 17: 5-11.
60.
Schwartz CE , Merriman MP, Reed GW, Hammes BJMeasuring patient treatment preferences in end-of-life care research: applications for advance care planning interventions and response shift research. J Palliat Med2004; 7: 233-245.
61.
Blazeby JM, Conroy T., Hammerlid E., et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer2003; 39: 1384-1394.
62.
Blazeby JM, Conroy T., Bottomley A., et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of a questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-STO 22, to assess quality of life in patients with gastric cancer . Eur J Cancer2004; 40: 2260-2268.
63.
Chang VT, Hwang SS, Feuerman M.Validation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Cancer2000; 88: 2164-2171.
64.
Lyons KD, Bakitas M., Hegel MT, Hanscom B., Hull J., Ahles TAReliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care (FACIT-Pal) Scale. J Pain Symptom Manage2009; 37: 23-32.
65.
McMillan SC , Weitzner M.Quality of life in cancer patients: use of a revised Hospice Index. Cancer Pract1998 ; 6: 282-288.
66.
McMillan SC , Dunbar SB, Zhang W.Validation of the Hospice Quality-of-Life Index and the Constipation Assessment Scale in end-stage cardiac disease patients in hospice care. J Hosp Palliat Nurs2008; 10: 106-117.
67.
Dobratz MCThe life closure scale: additional psychometric testing of a tool to measure psychological adaptation in death and dying. Res Nurs Health2004; 27: 52-62.
68.
Salmon P., Manzi F., Valori RMMeasuring the meaning of life for patients with incurable cancer: the life evaluation questionnaire (LEQ). Eur J Cancer1996; 32A: 755-760.
69.
Sterkenberg CA, King B., Woodward CAA reliability and validity study of the McMaster Quality of Life Scale (MQLS) for a palliative population . J Palliat Care1996; 12: 18-25.
70.
Cohen SR, Mount BM, Bruera E., Provost M., Rowe J., Tong K.Validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire in the palliative care setting: a multi-centre Canadian study demonstrating the importance of the existential domain. Palliat Med1997; 11: 3-20.
71.
Cohen SR, Mount BMLiving with cancer: ‘Good’ days and ‘Bad’ days - what produces them? Can the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire distinguish between them?Cancer2000; 89: 1854-1865.
72.
Lua PL, Salek S., Finlay I., Lloyd-Richards C.The feasibility, reliability and validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cardiff Short Form (MQOL-CSF) in palliative care population . Qual Life Res2005; 14: 1669-1681.
73.
McCanse RPThe McCanse Readiness for Death Instrument (MRDI): a reliable and valid measure for hospice care. Hosp J1995 ; 10: 15-26.
74.
Sherman DW, Ye XY, Beyer MC, Parkas V., Calabrese M., Gatto M.Symptom assessment of patients with advanced cancer and AIDS and their family caregivers: the results of a quality-of-life pilot study. Am J Hosp Palliat Care2007; 24: 350-365.
75.
Lobchuk MMThe memorial symptom assessment scale: modified for use in understanding family caregivers’ perceptions of cancer patients’ symptom experiences . J Pain Symptom Manage2003; 26: 644-654.
76.
Chang VT, Hwang SS, Kasimis B., Thaler HTShorter symptom assessment instruments: the Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (CMSAS). Cancer Invest2004 ; 22: 526-536.
77.
Hickman SE, Tilden VP, Tolle SWFamily reports of dying patients’ distress: the adaptation of a research tool to assess global symptom distress in the last week of life . J Pain Symptom Manage2001; 22: 565-574.
78.
Byock IR, Merriman MPMeasuring quality of life for patients with terminal illness: the Missoula-VITAS quality of life index. Palliat Med1998; 12: 231-244.
79.
Schwartz CE , Merriman MP, Reed G., Byock I.Evaluation of the Missoula-VITAS Quality of Life Index - revised: research tool or clinical tool?J Palliat Med2005; 8: 121-135.
80.
Rainbird KJ , Perkins JJ, Sanson-Fisher RWThe Needs Assessment for Advanced Cancer Patients (NA-ACP): a measure of the perceived needs of patients with advanced, incurable cancer. a study of validity, reliability and acceptability. Psycho-Oncology2005; 14: 297-306.
81.
Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Osse BH, Schade E., Grol RPPatient autonomy problems in palliative care: systematic development and evaluation of a questionnaire . J Pain Symptom Manage2005; 30: 264-270.
82.
Chochinov HM , Hassard T., McClement S., et al. The Patient Dignity Inventory: a novel way of measuring dignity related distress in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage2008; 36: 559-571.
83.
Osse BH, Vernooij MJ, Schade E., Grol RPTowards a new clinical tool for needs assessment in the palliative care of cancer patients: the PNPC instrument. J Pain Symptom Manage2004; 28: 329-341.
84.
Osse BH, Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Schade E., Grol RPA practical instrument to explore patients’ needs in palliative care: the Problems and Needs in Palliative Care questionnaire short version . Palliat Med2007; 21: 391-399.
85.
Hearn J., Higginson IJDevelopment and validation of a core outcome measure for palliative care: the Palliative Care Outcome Scale. Qual Health Care1999; 8: 219-227.
86.
Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Engelberg RA, Norris K., Asp C., Byock I.A measure of the quality of dying and death. Initial validation using after-death interviews with family members. J Pain Symptom Manage2002; 24: 17-31.
87.
Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, Bosworth HB, et al. Measuring quality of life at the end of life: validation of the QUAL-E. Palliat Support Care2004; 2: 3-14.
88.
Hermann C.Development and testing of the spiritual needs inventory for patients near the end of life. Oncol Nurs Forum2006 ; 33: 737-744.
