“We will remember them”: a mixed-method study to explore which post-funeral remembrance activities are most significant and important to bereaved people living with loss,and why those particular activities are chosen

Abstract

In an increasingly secular age in which society no longer offers a code of behaviour for those who are bereaved as in Victorian times, the majority of people do not seek support from church-based rituals of remembrance. Most hospices provide religious Services of Remembrance and Thanksgiving or non-faith remembrance gatherings for families and friends, and although these are usually well attended, the average number of families represented is usually less than 20% raising the question of whether alternative support should be offered to the remaining majority of families. This study explored which post-funeral remembrance activities are most significant and important to people living with death-related loss, and why those particular activities are chosen. A total of 43 participants took part in a mixed-method study using 2 different data sets: a self-report questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. To add further contextual data to support the study, a third dataset was created when six hospice bereavement counsellors met as a Focus Group. Results indicated that although formal remembrance events are valued, informal rituals created by the bereaved are more important and significant to them. Results could be divided into four different categories: rituals to maintain a ‘direct link’, or those undertaken ‘for’ the deceased, rituals that remember the deceased within the community and those viewed as an act of remembrance. The most common reason for choosing a ritual was to keep a bond with the deceased or ensure that the deceased was remembered by others. Remembrance and ritual is personal to each individual and is dynamic, altering from day to day. Remembrance appears to be a journey made up of many small daily rituals, some of which are generic to bereaved people and some of which are highly individualistic. For the majority of people, their informal rituals are far more important than the large planned events that hospices offer because the informal rituals occur and serve to sustain people in the context of their daily lives.

Keywords

bereaved grief informal ritual loss post-funeral remembrance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Walter T . The revival of death. London : Routledge ; 1997.

2 Gorer G . Death, grief and mourning in contemporary Britain. London : Cresset ; 1965.

3 Davies D . Death, ritual and belief. London : Cassell ; 1997.

4 Hospice in the Weald unpublished audit of hospices in Kent, Surrey and Sussex 2006.

5 Bowlby J; . Attachment and Loss. New York: Basic Books; 1969–1981.

6 Worden JW . Grief counselling and grief therapy. New York : Springer Publishing Company ; 2002.

7 Parkes CM . Bereavement studies of grief in adult life. London : Routledge ; 1996.

8 Stroebe M Schut H . The dual process model of coping with bereavement: rationale and description . Death Stud 1999; 23: 197 – 224 .

9 Klass, D, Silverman, PR, Nickman, S. Continuing Bonds: New Understandings of Grief. Washington D.C. : Taylor and Francis ; 1996.

10.

10 Cook A Oltjenbruns K . Dying and Grieving – Life Span and Family Perspectives. Orlando : Harcourt Brace College Publishers ; 1998.

11.

11 Rando T . Creating therapeutic rituals in the psychotherapy of the bereaved . Psychotherapy 1985; 22: 236 – 240 .

12.

12 Bolton C Camp D . Funeral rituals and the facilitation of grief work . Omega: J Death Dying 1986–1987; 17: 343 – 352 .

13.

13 Romanoff B Terenzio M . Rituals and the grieving process . Death Stud 1998; 22: 697 .

14.

14 Irion P . Changing patterns of ritual response to death . Omega: J Death Dying 1991; 22: 159 – 172 .

15.

15 Martin T Doka K . Men don’t cry, Women do: transcending gender stereotypes of grief. Philadephia : Brunner Mazel Incorporated; 2000.

16.

16 Hunter J . Bereavement: an incomplete rite of passage . Omega 2008; 56: 153 – 173 .

17.

17 Gowensmith W; . The effects of post-funeral rituals on adjustment to bereavement. Dissertation Abstracts International 2000.

18.

18 Castle J Phillips W . Grief rituals: Aspects that facilitate adjustment to bereavement . J Loss Trauma 2002; 8: 41 – 71 .

19.

19 Garces-Foley K . Funerals of the un-affiliated . Omega 2003; 46: 287 – 302 .

20.

20 Clegg F . Cremation, burials and memorials: The options and choices of bereaved people . Bereavement Care 1988; 7: 19 – 20 .

21.

21 Reeves N Boersma F . The therapeutic use of ritual in maladaptive grieving . Omega: J Death Dying 1990; 20: 281 – 291 .

22.

22 Hedtke L . Reconstructing the language of death and grief . Illness Crisis Loss 2002; 10: 285 – 293 .

23.

23 Weeks OD . Comfort and healing: death ceremonies that work . Illness Crisis Loss 2004; 12: 113 – 125 .

24.

24 Milligan S . The place of ritual in death and dying . St Columba’s Fellowship Newsletter 2006; 37: 6 – 7 .

25.

25 Cook E; . Saying goodbye our way. Guardian Newspaper 19 August 2006 Family (Suppl. 1).

26.

26 Emms S; . Rest in Peace. The Times Magazine 2 December 2006: 39–44.

27.

27 Rosenblatt P Elde C . Shared reminiscence about a deceased parent: implications for grief and grief counselling . Family Rel 1990; 39: 206 – 210 .

28.

28 Klass D Walter T . Processes of grieving: how bonds are continued. In: M Stroebe . (eds), Handbook of Bereavement Research: Consequences, coping and care. 5th ed. Washington : American Psychological Association ; 2007.

29.

29 Walter T . On bereavement – the culture of grief. Buckingham ; O U Press ; 1999.

30.

30 Speck P . Being there. London : SPCK ; 1988.

31.

31 Gordon T . A need for living. Glasgow : Wild Goose Publications ; 2001.