A systematic review of specialised palliative care for terminal patients: which model is better?

Abstract

There is evidence of improved effectiveness of specialised palliative care for terminally ill patients in comparison to conventional care. However, there is uncertainty about which model is better. The objective of this systematic review was to identify studies that compare specialised palliative care models between them assessing their effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. We searched studies published between 2003 and 2006 in several electronic databases and updated the search in MEDLINE up to 2008. Papers published before 2003 were identified by means of previous systematic reviews and manual search. Studies with broad designs comparing two or more specialised palliative care programmes in adults with terminal illness were selected. Six systematic reviews, three studies on effectiveness and one cost study were included. All systematic reviews drew the conclusion that specialised palliative care is more effective than conventional care. The methodological limitations of the original studies and the heterogeneity of programmes did not allow to draw conclusions about whether a specific model of specialised palliative care is more or less effective or cost-effective than other.

Keywords

palliative care specialised care systematic review terminal patient

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 World Health Organization Expert Committee. Cancer pain relief and palliative care. WHO Technical Report Series 804. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1990. p. 1–75.

2 E Bruera RK Portenoy , (eds). Topics in palliative care. Vol. 5. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 3–51.

3 MA Benítez del Rosario A Salinas Martín , (eds). Cuidados Paliativos y Atención Primaria. Aspectos de Organización. Barcelona: Springer-Verlag Ibérica; 2000. p. 97–155.

4 Heran J Higginson IJ . Do specialist palliative care teams improve outcomes for cancer patients? A systematic literature review. Palliat Med 1998; 12: 317–332.

5 Chan A Wooddruff RK . Palliative care in a general teaching hospital. 1. Assessment of needs. Med J Aust 1991; 155: 597–599.

6 Seamark DA Williams S Hall M Lawrence CJ Gilbert J . Palliative terminal care in community hospitals and a hospice: a comparative study. Br J Gen Pract 1998; 48: 1312–1316.

7 Higginson IJ . Evidence based palliative care. BMJ 1999; 319: 462–463.

8 Raftery JP Addington-Hall JM MacDonald LD Anderson HR Bland JM Chamberlain J . A randomized controlled trial of the cost-effectiveness of a district coordinating service for terminally cancer patients. Palliat Med 1996; 10: 151–161.

10.

11.

11 Jadad AR Moore RA Carroll D Jenkinson C Reynolds DJ Gavaghan DJ . Assessing the quality of reports of randomised clinical trials: is blinding necessary. Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1–12.

12.

13.

13 Drummond MF O’Brien BJ Stoddart GL Torrance GW . Métodos para la Evaluación Económica de los Programas de Asistencia Sanitaria. Madrid: Ediciones Díaz de Santos; 2001. p. 31–57.

14.

15.

15 Davies E Higginson IJ . Systematic review of specialist palliative day-care for adults with cancer. Support Care Cancer 2005; 13: 607–627.

16.

16 Critchley P Jadad AR Taniguchi A Woods A Stevens R Reyno L . Are some palliative care delivery systems more effective and efficient than others? A systematic review of comparative studies. J Palliat Care 1999; 15: 40–47.

17.

17 Salisbury C Bosanquet N Wilkinson EK Franks PJ Kite S Lorentzon M . The impact of different models of specialist palliative care on patient's quality of life: a systematic literature review. Palliat Med 1999; 13: 3–17.

18.

18 Aldasoro E Pérez A Olaizola MT . La asistencia a pacientes en la fase final de la vida: revisión sistemática de la literatura y estudio en el medio hospitalario del País Vasco. Investigación Comisionada. Vitoria-Gasteiz. Departamento de Sanidad, Gobierno Vasco, 2003. Informe nº: Osteba D-03-01. p. 1–77.

19.

19 Higginson IJ Finlay IG Goodwin DM Hood K Edwards AG Cook A . Is there evidence that palliative care teams alter end-of-life experiences of patients and their caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage 2003; 25: 150–168.

20.

20 Zimmermann C Riechelmann R Krzyzanowska M Rodin G Tannock I . Effectiveness of specialized palliative care: a systematic review. JAMA 2008; 299: 1698–1709.

21.

21 Hanks GW Robbins M Sharp D Forbes K Done K Peters TJ . The imPaCT study: a randomised controlled trial to evaluate a hospital palliative care team. Br J Cancer 2002; 87: 733–739.

22.

22 Greer DS Mor V Morris JN Sherwood S Kidder D Birnbaum H . An alternative in terminal care: results of the National Hospice Study. J Chronic Dis 1986; 39: 9–26.

23.

23 Morris JN Mor V Goldberg RJ Sherwood S Greer DS Hiris J . The effect of treatment setting and patient characteristics on pain in terminal cancer patients: a report from the National Hospice Study. J Chronic Dis 1986; 39: 27–35.

24.

24 Viney LL Walker BM Robertson T Lilley B Ewan C . Dying in palliative care units and in hospital: a comparison of the quality of life of terminal cancer patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994; 62: 157–164.

25.

25 Doolittle GC . A cost measurement study for a home-based telehospice service. J Telemed Telecare 2000; 6(Suppl. 1): 193–195.

26.

26 Rinck GC van den Bos GA Kleijnen J de Haes HJ Schadé E Veenhof CH . Methodologic issues in effectiveness research on palliative cancer care: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 1697–1707.