Improving the effectiveness of interventions in palliative care: the potential role of qualitative research in enhancing evidence from randomized controlled trials

Abstract

Evaluating interventions in palliative care using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has helped advance the specialty and create an evidence base for the delivery of care. RCTs, however, are notoriously difficult to conduct in palliative care, raising a variety of practical, ethical and moral dilemmas. Mixed-methods research, which combines qualitative research and RCTs, offers a potential solution to these problems. This paper begins by examining the theoretical basis for combining the two approaches, before reviewing the specific role qualitative research could play in planning, conducting and implementing trials. The paper then goes on to explore how palliative care research currently uses the mixed-methods approach, by searching the trials included in six Cochrane Systematic Reviews (n = 146) on the incorporation of qualitative research. Only one trial undertook qualitative research. These findings reflect some of the challenges facing mixed-methods research, which include lack of experience in a research team, the problems of obtaining funding and difficulties in publishing. The paper concludes that while combining qualitative and quantitative research is not a panacea for methodological problems in palliative care research, with careful planning and integration, the approach may enhance the clinical and ethical utility of trial findings, which in turn will improve patient care.

Keywords

evidence-based practice palliative care qualitative research randomized controlled trials research design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Strauss SE Scott Richardson W Glasziou P . Evidence-Based Medicine: How to practice and teach EBM, thirrd edition. Edinburgh : Elsevier Churchill Livingstone , 2005.

2 Piggott M McGee H Feuer D . Has CONSORT improved the reporting of randomized controlled trials in the palliative care literature? A systematic review. Palliat Med 2004; 18: 32 – 38 .

3 McWhinney IR Bass MJ Donner A . Evaluation of a palliative care service: problems and pitfalls. BMJ 1994; 309: 1340 – 1342 .

4 Rinck GC van den Bos GA Kleijnen J de Haes HJ Schade E Veenhof CH . Methodologic issues in effectiveness research on palliative cancer care: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 1697 – 1707 .

5 Medical Research Council . A Framework for Development and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health. London : MRC , 2001.

6 Medical Research Council . Clinical Trials for Tomorrow: An MRC Review of Randomised Controlled Trials. London: MRC. Clinical Trial Series, 2003.

7 Hussain-Gambles M Atkin K Leese B . South Asian participation in clinical trials: the views of lay people and health professionals. Health Policy 2006; 77: 149 – 165 .

8 Atkin K Ahmad WI . Living a ‘normal’ life: young people coping with thalassaemia major or sickle cell disorder. Soc Sci Med 2001; 53: 615 – 626 .

9 Atkin K Chattoo S . Approaches to conducting qualitative research in ethnically diverse populations. In: J Nazroo , (ed). Methodological Issues in Research Relating to Black and Minority Ethnic Groups: Publishing the Evidence. London : Taylor Francis , 2006.

10.

10 A Bowling S Ebrahim , (eds). Handbook of Health Research Methods. Maidenhead : Open University Press , 2005.

11.

11 Adamson J . Combined qualitative and quantitative designs. In: A Bowling S Ebrahim , (eds). Handbook of Health Research Methods. Maidenhead : Open University Press , 2005.

12.

12 Hammersley M . Deconstructing the qualitative–quantitative divide. In: J Brannen , (ed). Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Aldershot : Ashgate Publishing Company , 1992.

13.

13 Brannen J . Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches: an overview. In: J Brannen , (ed). Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Aldershot : Ashgate Publishing Company , 1992.

14.

14 Flemming K . The knowledge base for evidence-based nursing: a role for mixed methods research? ANS Adv Nurs Sci 2007; 30: 41 – 51 .

15.

15 Greene JC Caracelli VJ Graham WF . Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal 1989; 11: 255 – 274 .

16.

16 Teddlie C Tashakkori A . Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioural sciences. In: C Teddlie A Tashakkori , (eds). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage , 2003.

17.

17 Bryman A . Social Research Methods, second edition. Oxford : Oxford University Press , 2004.

18.

18 Mount BM Cohen R MacDonald N Bruera E Dudgeon DJ . Ethical issues in palliative care research revisited. Palliat Med 1995; 9: 165 – 166 .

19.

19 Robbins M . Evaluating Palliative Care. Establishing the Evidence Base. Oxford : Oxford University Press , 1998.

20.

20 de Raeve L . Ethical issues in palliative care research. Palliat Med 1994; 8: 298 – 305 .

21.

21 Pink T . Moral obligation. In: A O’Hear , (ed). Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press , 2004.

22.

22 Weber M . Essays in Sociology. London : Kegan Paul , 1948.

23.

23 Janssens R Gordijn B . Clinical trials in palliative care: an ethical evaluation. Patient Educ Couns 2000; 41: 55 – 62 .

24.

24 Ling J Rees E Hardy J . What influences participation in clinical trials in palliative care in a cancer centre? Eur J Cancer 2000; 36: 621 – 626 .

25.

25 Jubb AM . Palliative care research: trading ethics for an evidence base. J Med Ethics 2002; 28: 342 – 346 .

26.

26 Casarett DJ Karlawish JH . Are special ethical guidelines needed for palliative care research? J Pain Symptom Manage 2000; 20: 130 – 139 .

27.

27 Addington-Hall J . Research sensitivities to palliative care patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2002; 11: 220 – 224 .

28.

28 Grande GE Todd CJ . Why are trials in palliative care so difficult? Palliat Med 2000; 14: 69 – 74 .

29.

29 Gelber RD Goldhirsch A . Can a clinical trial be the treatment of choice for patients with cancer? J Natl Cancer Inst 1988; 80: 886 – 887 .

30.

30 Fagge D Corrie P Regan J . Consumers and trials. Lancet 2001; 358: 763 – 764 .

31.

31 Small N Rhodes P . Too Ill to Talk? User Involvement in Palliative Care. London : Routledge , 2000.

32.

32 Marsden J Bradburn J . Patient and clinician collaboration in the design of a national randomized breast cancer trial. Health Expect 2004; 7: 6 – 17 .

33.

33 Thornton H . Patient perspectives on involvement in cancer research in the UK. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2002; 11: 205 – 209 .

34.

34 Donovan J Mills N Smith M Brindle L Jacoby A Peters T . Quality improvement report: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficult. BMJ 2002; 325: 766 – 770 .

35.

35 Thornton H Dixon-Woods M . Recruitment of women into trials. Lancet 2002; 359: 164 – 165 .

36.

36 Aranda S . Changing paradigms in research: do we need to rethink the future? Prog Palliat Care 2000; 8: 193 – 197 .

37.

37 Kendall M Harris F Boyd K Sheikh A Murray SA Brown D . Key challenges and ways forward in researching the “good death”: qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study. BMJ 2007; 334: 521 .

38.

38 Ewing G Rogers M Barclay S McCabe J Martin A Todd C . Recruiting patients into a primary care based study of palliative care: why is it so difficult? Palliat Med 2004; 18: 452 – 459 .

39.

39 Cook AM Finlay IG Butler-Keating RJ . Recruiting into palliative care trials: lessons learnt from a feasibility study. Palliat Med 2002; 16: 163 – 165 .

40.

40 Hudson P . The experience of research participation for family caregivers of palliative care cancer patients. Int J Palliat Nurs 2003; 9: 120 – 123 .

41.

41 Grunfeld E Zitzelsberger L Coristine M Aspelund F . Barriers and facilitators to enrollment in cancer clinical trials: qualitative study of the perspectives of clinical research associates. Cancer 2002; 95: 1577 – 1583 .

42.

42 Westcombe AM Gambles MA Wilkinson SM Barnes K Fellowes D Maher EJ . Learning the hard way! Setting up an RCT of aromatherapy massage for patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Med 2003; 17: 300 – 307 .

43.

43 Cox K . Enhancing cancer clinical trial management: recommendations from a qualitative study of trial participants’ experiences. Psychooncology 2000; 9: 314 – 322 .

44.

44 Raudonis BM . Ethical considerations in qualitative research with hospice patients. Qual Health Res 1992; 2: 238 – 249 .

45.

45 Barnett M . Interviewing terminally ill people: is it fair to take their time? Palliat Med 2001; 15: 157 – 158 .

46.

46 Bradburn J Maher J . User and carer participation in research in palliative care. Palliat Med 2005; 19: 91 – 92 .

47.

47 Daniels LE Exley C . Preparation, information and liaison: conducting successful research in palliative care. Int J Palliat Nurs 2001; 7: 192 – 197 .

48.

48 Featherstone K Donovan JL . Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients’ perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1998; 317: 1177 – 1180 .

49.

49 King M . The effects of patients’ and practitioners’ preferences on randomized clinical trials. Palliat Med 2000; 14: 539 – 542 .

50.

50 Fletcher RH Fletcher SW Wagner EH . Clinical Epidemiology. Baltimore, MD : Williams and Wilkins , 1992.

51.

51 Fitzpatrick R Davey C Buxton MJ Jones DR . Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2: i–74 .

52.

52 Korfage IJ Hak T de Koning HJ Essink-Bot ML . Patients’ perceptions of the side-effects of prostate cancer treatment–a qualitative interview study. Soc Sci Med 2006; 63: 911 – 919 .

53.

53 Nettleton S . ‘I just want permission to be ill’: towards a sociology of medically unexplained symptoms. Soc Sci Med 2006; 62: 1167 – 1178 .

54.

54 Meyer G Marjanovic Z Valcke J Lorcerie B Gruel Y Solal-Celigny P . Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a randomized controlled study. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1729 – 1735 .

55.

55 Noble SI Finlay IG . Is long-term low-molecular-weight heparin acceptable to palliative care patients in the treatment of cancer related venous thromboembolism? A qualitative study. Palliat Med 2005; 19: 197 – 201 .

56.

56 Ferrell B Wisdom C Wenzl C Brown J . Effects of controlled-released morphine on quality of life for cancer pain. Oncol Nurs Forum 1989; 16: 521 – 526 .

57.

57 Bryman A . Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. J Mixed Methods Res 2007; 1: 8 – 22 .

58.

58 Cox K . Assessing the quality of life of patients in phase I and II anti-cancer drug trials: interviews versus questionnaires. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56: 921 – 934 .

59.

59 Onwuegbuzie AJ Teddlie C . A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In: A Tashakkori C Teddlie , (eds). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage , 2003.