This paper describes the questionnaire component of a two-stage study to examine the research priorities of palliative care patients. In the first stage focus groups were conducted to determine a list of priorities for future research: a questionnaire created from these themes was then used in five hospices across East Anglia. Patients thought that the focus group priorities were important and scored research into emergency care, pain control and helping doctors to understand what patients were saying as most important. Differences in priority were associated with gender, age and in-patient versus day therapy patients. Palliative Medicine 2008;22:7—12
NCRI Strategic Planning Group on Supportive and Palliative Care.Supportive and palliative care research in the UK. London, NCRI, 2004.
2.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence.Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. London, NICE, 2004.
3.
Bradburn J., Maher J.User and carer participation in research in palliative care. Palliat Med2005; 19: 91—2.
4.
www.nihr.ac.uk/programmes_research_programmes_aspx, Accessed November 2006.
5.
Dean RA, McClement SEPalliative care research: methodological and ethical challenges. Int J Palliat Nurs2002; 8: 376—80.
6.
Grande G., Todd CJWhy are trials in palliative care so difficult?Palliat Med2000; 14: 69—74.
7.
Addington-Hall J.Research sensitivities to palliative care patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)2002 ; 11: 220—4.
8.
Higginson I., Shipman C., Gysels M. et al. Scoping exercise on generalist services for adults at the end of life: research, knowledge, policy and future research needs. Recommendations for future research in generalist end of life care. Report to the NHS Service Delivery and Organisation Research and Development Programme. 2007
9.
Perkins P., Barclay S., Booth S.What are patients' priorities for palliative care research? Focus group study . Palliat Med2007; 21: 219—25.
10.
Brown K., Dyas J., Chahal P., Khalil Y., Riaz P., Cummings—Jones J. Discovering the research priorities of people with diabetes in a multicultural community: a focus group study. Br J Gen Pract2006; 56: 206—13.
11.
Stevens T., Wilde D., Hunt J., Ahmedzai SHOvercoming the challenges to consumer involvement in cancer research. Health Expect2003; 6: 81—8.
12.
Andejeski Y. , Bisceglio I., Dickersin K. et al. Quantitative impact of including consumers in the scientific review of breast cancer research proposals. J Womens Health Gend Based Med2002; 11: 379—88.
13.
Wright D., Corner J., Hopkinson J., Foster C.Listening to the view of people affected by cancer about cancer research: an example of participatory research in setting the cancer research agenda . Health Expect2006; 9: 3—12.
14.
Teddlie C., Tashakkori A.Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioural sciences. In Tashakkori A, Teddlie C eds. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Sciences. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 2003: 3—50.
15.
Corner J., Wright D., Hopkinson J., Gunaratnam Y., McDonald J., Foster C.The research priorities of patients attending UK cancer treatment centres: findings from a modified nominal group study. Br J Cancer2007; 96: 875—81.
16.
Wright D., Corner J., Hopkinson J., Foster C.How to involve cancer patients at the end of life as co-researchers. Palliat Med2006; 20: 821—7.
17.
Glare P., Virik K., Jones M. et al. A systematic review of physicians' survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients. BMJ2003; 327: 195—8.
18.
Ross C., Cornbleet M.Attitudes of patients and staff to research in a specialist palliative care unit. Palliat Med2003; 17: 491—7.
19.
Henderson M. , Addington-Hall JM, Hotopf M.The willingness of palliative care patients to participate in research. J Pain Symptom Manage2005; 29: 116—8.
20.
Shumay D., Maskarinec G., Gotay C., Heiby E., Kakai H.Determinants of the degree of complementary and alternative medicine use among patients with cancer. J Alternat Complement Med2002; 8: 661—71.
21.
Cherniack E. , Pan C.Alternative and complementary medicine for elderly veterans: why and how they use it. Alternat Complement Ther2002; 8: 291—4.
22.
Worth A., Boyd K., Kendall M. et al. Out-of-hours palliative care: a qualitative study of patients, carers and professionals. Br J Gen Pract2006 ; 56: 6—13.
23.
Morgan D.Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J Mixed Meth Res2007; 1: 48—76.
24.
Kendall M., Harris F., Boyd K. et al. Key challenges and ways forward in researching the `good death': qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study. BMJ2007; 334: 521—4.
