The use of standardized outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK

Abstract

Objective: To ascertain which standardized instruments are currently most commonly used as outcome measures for rehabilitation in routine clinical practice in the UK.

Design: The study used a postal questionnaire which was sent out to members of two major societies of rehabilitation professionals in the UK.

Results: Of 182 rehabilitation centres represented by respondents, 140 (77%) collected at least one standardized measure and 42 did not. Principal reasons for not recording measures were lack of time and not knowing what to collect. As had been anticipated, a very wide range of different measures were used by different centres, however some clear favourites emerged including the 10 m Walk, the Motricity Index and the Nine-hole Peg Test. One hundred and twenty-three centres used one or more global disability measure of which the commonest were the Barthel Index or one of its modifications and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and/or Functional Assessment Method (FAM). Among units that used handicap or extended activities of daily living (EADL) scales, the Nottingham EADL, the London Handicap Scale and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-22 or 12) were most popular. Outside neurorehabilitation, the Harold Wood/Stanmore mobility grades were used by 10/18 amputee rehabilitation centres and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) was used by 15/48 units providing musculoskeletal rehabilitation.

Conclusions: It is clear that no one measure is suitable in all settings and services, but the most popular measures from this survey may reasonably form the basis for a 'basket of recommended instruments' that may help to guide units wishing to collect outcome data but not knowing which to choose.