Subjective well-being one year after stroke

Abstract

Objective: To compare the subjective well-being of stroke patients with that of a reference group, and to study its relationship to patient characteristics.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Interviews performed in the respondents' homes, tests performed at the outpatient clinic.

Subjects: Sixty patients one year after stroke (median age 74 years, interquartile range (IQR) 68-80), and 419 reference individuals (median age 75 years, IQR 71-80).

Measures: Subjective well-being assessed with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-20). Explanatory variables were demographic and medical characteristics of the individuals and scores on validated tests: Barthel Index, Frenchay Activities Index (FAI), Sodring Motor Evaluation of Stroke Patients, Assessment of Cerebral Stroke and other Brain Damage, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Results: A significantly higher proportion of the stroke patients than of the controls rated their subjective well-being as low, also after adjustment for age and gender (adjusted odds ratio 20.1, 95% confidence interval 9.6-42.0 by logistic regression). In bivariate analyses, leg and arm motor impairment, visuospatial impairment, apraxia, aphasia, low Barthel score, low FAI score, low MMSE score, and institutionalization were highly significant predictors of low subjective well-being (p-values <0.01). In multiple linear regression, a model with gender (p = 0.3) and upper extremity motor score (p <0.01 ) fitted the data well, and explained 48% of the variance in GHQ.

Conclusion: Subjective well-being is decreased one year after stroke, and this is mainly attributed to arm motor impairments.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahlsio B. , Britton M. , Murray V. , Theorell T. Disablement and quality of life after stroke. Stroke 1984; 15: 886-90.

Viitanen M. , Fugl-Meyer KS , Bernspång B. , Fugl-Meyer AR Life satisfaction in long-term survivors after stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med 1988; 20: 17-24.

Ebrahim S. , Barer D. , Nouri F. Use of the Nottingham Health Profile with patients after stroke. J Epidemiol Community Health 1986; 40: 166-69.

Åström M. , Asplund K. , Åström T. Psychosocial function and life satisfaction after stroke. Stroke 1992; 23: 527-31.

Hatano S. Experience from a multicentre stroke register: a preliminary report. Bull World Health Organ 1976; 54: 541-53.

Goldberg D. Identifying psychiatric illness among general medical patients. BMJ 1985; 291: 161-62.

Malt UF , Mogstad T-E. , Refnin IB Goldbergs General Health Questionnaire. [In Norwegian]. Tidsskr Nor Lœgeforen 1989; 109: 1391-94.

Wade DT Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Sødring KM , Bautz-Holter E. , Ljunggren AE , Wyller TB Description and validation of a test of motor function and activities in stroke patients. The Sødring Motor Evaluation of Stroke Patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 1995; 27: 211-17.

10.

Brækhus A. , Laake K. , Engedal K. The Mini-Mental State Examination: identifying the most efficient variables for detecting cognitive impairment in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 1139-45.

11.

Sveen U. , Bautz-Holter E. , Wyller TB , Ljunggren AE Assessment of cognitive impairments after stroke: a methodological study. Scand J Occup Ther 1994; 1: 85-93.

12.

Bernspång B. , Viitanen M. , Eriksson S. Impairments of perceptual and motor functions. Their influence on selfcare ability 4-6 years after stroke. Occup Ther J Res 1989; 9: 27-37.

13.

Reinvang I. , Sundet K. The validity of functional assessment with neuropsychological tests in aphasic stroke patients. Scand J Psychol 1985; 26: 208-18.

14.

Dixon WJ BMDP statistical software. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.

15.

Mor V. , Guadagnoli E. Quality of life measurement: a psychometric Tower of Babel. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41: 1055-58.

16.

Fletcher A. , Gore S. , Jones D. , Fitzpatrick R. , Spiegelhalter D. , Cox D. Quality of life measures in health care. II: Design, analysis, and interpretation. BMJ 1992; 305: 1145-48.

17.

Gill TM , Feinstein AR A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. JAMA 1994; 272: 619-26.

18.

Campbell A. , Converse PE , Rodgers WL The quality of American life. Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions . New York: Russell Sage Foundation , 1976.

19.

Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 1984; 95: 542-75.

20.

Mukherjee R. The quality of life. Valuation in social research. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1989.

21.

de Haan R, Aaronsen N , Limburg M. , Hewer RL , van Crevel H. Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke 1993; 24: 320-27.

22.

Wade DT Measuring the quality of life in acute stroke. In: Amery WK , Bousser M-G , Rose FC eds. Clinical trial methodology in stroke. London; Baillière Tindall , 1989: 166-76.

23.

Nydegger CN Measuring morale and life satisfaction. In: Fry CL , Keith J eds. New methods for old age research. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey, 1986: 213-30.

24.

Bjordal K. , Kaasa S. Psychological distress in head and neck cancer patients 7-11 years after curative treatment. Br J Cancer 1995; 71: 592-97.

25.

Steine S. , Lærum E. , Eritsland J. , Arnesen H. Predictors of enhanced well-being after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Intern Med 1996; 239: 69-73.

26.

Andrews FM , McKennel AC. Measures of self-reported well-being: their affective, cognitive, and other components. Soc Indicat Res 1980 ; 8: 127-55.

27.

Moum T. Yea-saying and mood-of-the-day effects in self-reported quality of life. Soc Indicat Res 1988; 20: 117-39.

28.

Niemi M-L. , Laaksonen R. , Kotila M. , Waltimo O. Quality of life 4 years after stroke. Stroke 1988; 19: 1101-07.

29.

Nydevik I. , Hulter-Åsberg K. Sickness impact after stroke. Scand J Prim Health Care 1992; 10: 284-89.

30.

Johansson BB , Jadbäck G. , Norrving B. , Widner H. , Wiklund I. Evaluation of long-term functional status in first-ever stroke patients in a defined population. Scand J Rehabil Med 1992, Suppl 26: 105-14.

31.

King RB Quality of life after stroke. Stroke 1996; 27: 1467-72.