Value of measuring perceived problems in a stroke population

Abstract

Functional status assessments mainly concentrate on difficulty in performance and/or dependency on other people. Very few assessments document the perceived problems of the patient regarding the assessed activities. This study evaluates the added value of measuring perceived problems using a parallel assessment method: the Rehabilitation Activities Profile. The study population consisted of 57 stroke patients living at home, six months after stroke. Thirty-three were receiving therapy (physiotherapy or rehabilitation day care). The patients indicated that they perceived a number of problems, especially on the items 'walking', 'using transport', 'leisure activities' and 'relation with friends/acquaintances'. The perceived problem scores did not relate in a uniform way to the disability scores. The perceived problem scores were dichotomized. The proportions of persons with perceived problems showed statistically significant differences between the therapy group and the nontherapy group for 15 out of 21 items (p <0.02). The cumulative relative frequency distributions showed that the therapy group indicated significantly more problems than the nontherapy group (p <0.01). It was concluded that it is at least as important to measure perceived problems as it is to measure disabilities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Feinstein AR , Josephy BR , Wells CK Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Ann Intern Med 1986 ; 105: 413-20.

Williams GH Disablement and the social context of daily activity. Int Disabil Stud 1987; 9: 97-102.

Hunt SM , McKenna SP , McEwan J. et al. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1980; 34: 281-86.

Bergner M. , Bobbitt RA , Carter WB , Gibson BS The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981; 19: 155-57.

Pincus T. , Summey JA , Soraci SA , Wallston KA , Hummon NP Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1983; 26: 1346-53.

Fries DF , Spitz PW , Kraines RG , Holman HR Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980; 23: 137-45.

Laman H. , Lankhorst GJ Subjective weighting of disability: an approach to quality of life assessments in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 1994; 16: 198-204.

Jiwa-Boerrigter H. , Van Engelen HGM , Lankhorst GJ Application of the ICIDH in rehabilitation medicine. Int Disabil Stud 1990; 12: 17-19.

World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps - a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 1980.

10.

Bennekom CAM van , Jelles F. , Lankhorst GJ Rehabilitation Activities Profile, the ICIDH as a framework for a problem-oriented assessment method in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 1995; 17: 169-75.

11.

Jelles F. , Bennekom CAM van, Lankhorst GJ, Sibbel CJP, Bouter LM. Inter- and intra-rater agreement of the Rehabilitation Activities Profile. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 407-16.

12.

Bennekom CAM van , Jelles F. , Lankhorst GJ , Bouter LM The Rehabilitation Activities Profile: a validation study of its use as disability index with stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 501-507.

13.

Fleiss JL Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York : Wiley, 1981.

14.

Siegel S. , Castellan NJ Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.