This paper presents preliminary results from a systematic clinical study in which the abilities of 20 children with severe neurological impairments were traced whilst making use of a robotic aid to eating. The study provided the opportunity to assess the medium-term reliability of the device and to evaluate its impact on oral-motor and related functional skills. Results show that all except two children could use the aid, with varying degrees of adult support and documents the preconditions for effective use in rehabilitative or domestic settings. Changes observed in the children's oral-motor skills consequent upon using the device will be evaluated in subsequent reports.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Gisel EG, Patrick J.Identification of children with cerebral palsy unable to maintain a normal nutritional state. Lancet1988; 6: 283-86.
2.
Loughlin GMRespiratory consequences of dysfunctional swallowing and aspiration . Dysphagia1989; 3: 126-30.
3.
Love RJ, Hagerman EL, Taimi EGSpeech performance, dysphagia and oral reflexes in cerebral palsy . J Speech Hear Dis1980; XLV: 59-75.
4.
Hillman MR, Orpwood RDA robot workstation for the disabled. In: The Proceedings of the first international workshop on robotic applications in medical and health care. Ottawa, Ontario, 23-24 June, 1988 .
5.
Prior SD, Warner PR, Parsons JT, White AS, Oettinger P.A hybrid rehabilitation robotic arm for the physically disabled electric wheelchair user. In: Whittaker M ed. The proceedings of the 1992 international conference on rehabilitation robotics . Keele University, Staffordshire , UK, 1992.
6.
Harwin WS, Ginige A., Jackson RDA robot workstation for use in the education of the physically handicapped . IEEE Trans Biomed Eng1988; 35: 127-31.
7.
Hammel J., Hall K., Lees D. et al. Clinical evaluation of a desktop robotic assistant. J Rehabil Res Dev1989; 26: 1-16.
8.
Dallaway JL, Jackson RDRAID - a vocational robotic workstation. In: Whittaker M ed. The proceedings of the 1992 international conference on rehabilitation robotics. Keele University , Staffordshire, UK, 1992.
9.
Fu C.An independent vocational workstation for a quadriplegic. In: The proceedings of the 9th annual RESNA conference, Minneapolis, MN, 1986: 182-84.
10.
Kwee HHSpartacus and manus: telethesis developments in France and in the Netherlands . In: Foulds R ed. Interactive robotic aids — one option for independent living: an international perspective, monograph 37. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund, 1986: 7-17.
11.
Shramowiat M., Bach JR, Bocobo C.Functional enhancement of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy with the use of robot-manipulator trainer arms. J Neurol Rehabil1989; 3: 129-32.
12.
Hegarty JR, Rehabilitation robotics: the user's perspective. In: Jackson RD, Gosine RG, Mahoney RM eds. The proceedings of 2nd Cambridge workshop on rehabilitation robotics. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Engineering Department, 1991.
13.
Hegarty JR, Topping M. 'Handy 1': a low-cost robotic aid to eating. In: The proceedings of the 1991 international conference on rehabilitation robotics . Center for Rehabilitation Technology, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA, 1991.
14.
Hegarty JRIntroducing robotics into rehabilitation settings. Industrial Robot1992; 19: 3-5.
15.
Morris SEPre-speech assessment scale. A rating scale for the measurement of pre-speech behaviours from birth through two years. Clifton, NJ: Preston Corporation, 1984.
16.
Gisel EGChewing cycles in 2- to 8-year-old normal children: a developmental profile . Am J Occup Ther1988; 42: 40-46.
17.
Gisel EGDevelopment of oral side preference during chewing and its relation to hand preference in normal 2- to 8-year-old children. Am J Occup Ther1988; 42: 378-83.
18.
Gisel EGTongue movements in normal 2- to 8-year-old children: extended profile of an eating assessment. Am J Occup Ther1988 ; 42: 384-89.
19.
Reilly S., Skuse D.Characteristics and management of feeding problems of young children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol1992; 34: 379-88.
20.
Johnson CB, Deitz JCTime use of mothers with preschool children. Am J Occup Ther1985; 39: 578-83.
Kenny DJ, Koheil RM, Greenberg J. et al. Development of a multidisciplinary feeding profile for children who are dependent feeders. Dysphagia1989; 4: 16-28.
23.
Stratton M.Behavioural assessment scale of oral functions in feeding. Am J Occup Ther1981; 35: 719-21.
24.
Gallender D.Oral evaluation for eating purposes. In: Gallender D. Teaching eating and toileting skills to the multi-handicapped in the school setting . Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas , 1980: 302-306.
25.
Petersen P. , Ottenbcher K.Applied behavioral techniques and an adaptive device to teach lip closure to severely handicapped children. Am J Mental Def1986; 90: 535-39.
26.
Mueller HAFacilitating feeding and pre-speech. In: Pearson PH, Williams E eds. Physical therapy services in the developmental disabilities. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1972: 283-310.
27.
Topping MJRehabilitation robotics into the 1990s. In: Hegarty JR ed. Into the 1990s: the present and future of microcomputers for people with learning difficulties. Market Drayton: Change Publications, 1991: 103-107.
28.
Wilkison D.Improvements in head posture and oral-motor skills through the use of a robotic eating aid. Unpublished Report: CASE Unit, Psychology Department , Keele University, Staffordshire , UK, 1990.
29.
Whittaker M.Use of the Handy 1 robotic aid to eating by 20 people with severe disabilities . In: The proceedings of the 1991 international conference on rehabilitation robotics. Center for Rehabilitation Technology , Georgia Institute of Technology, USA, 1991.
30.
Skuse D., Reilly S., Wolke D., Mathisen B.The feeding assessment schedule (unpublished protocol). London: Institute of Child Health, University of London, 1987.
